Piltdown Superman

Time 2020-11-08 21:05:54

Web Name: Piltdown Superman

WebSite: http://www.piltdownsuperman.com

ID:109392

Keywords:

Piltdown,Superman,

Description:

Welcome to the home of The Question Evolution Project. Presenting information demonstrating that there is no truth in minerals-to-man evolution, and presenting evidence for special creation. Established by Cowboy Bob Sorensenby Cowboy Bob SorensenDuring October 9-11, a free online viewing ofDismantled: A Scientific Deconstruction of the Theory of Evolution was announced. It was publicized here as a component in an article to discuss false accusations by atheists of Christian profiteering. We will focus on the movie itself now.Image taken from a screenshot of the trailer by Back2GenesisDismantledraises the question early on, a question that people have wondered for millennia: Where did everything come from? There have been many speculations throughout time, but the main considerations can be narrowed down. One is that life, the universe, and everything are the result of blind natural processes and chance; we are lucky accidents. The other idea is that the book of Genesis is real history. Rational people want evidence to support ideas.The movie makes the case for the differences between operationaland historicalscience. Some people get on the prod about this (including a scientist who is a Christian I could mention) but the distinction is quite valid. Operational science is repeatable, testable, and so forth. Nobody can repeat or test the origin of the universe or the evolution of all things from a single-celled organism, for instance. Yes, scientists use methods in the present to attempt to see if past events can be explained (forensic scientists do this in crime labs). Cosmic, biological, and other types of particles-to-paleontologist evolution are history, old son.Note than nobody, scientist or layperson, is a blank slate. We all have presuppositions from which we interpret evidence and draw conclusions. Both biblical creationists and secular scientists work from them and see if their conclusions are warranted. (Unfortunately, we have seen many times that the narrative of naturalism trumps evidence for secularists.) After all, no scientist goes around gathering evidence and building from that alone.I took several pages of notes, but those need to be trimmed down. Otherwise, this review will become cumbersome and I don't think I'll be doing justice to Dismantled. Mind if I give you highlights drawn from the seven scientists involved?I'll slip in a few of my own thoughts as well.This movie used information from several areas of science. These included biology, genetics, and paleoanthropology. One major fallacy that internet evolutionists and textbook writers persist in using is unfounded extrapolation.Essentially, a littleevolution leads to a lot of evolution. They conflate microevolutionwith macroevolution. There are biological limits. Many biblical creationists avoid these terms, preferring instead to distinguish between variations and full-on universal common descent evolution.The nature of mutations is discussed and how the overwhelming majority of them are harmful or at least neutral. ("Beneficial mutations" are often based on opinion, and some alleged benefits are harmful to other areas in the genome of an organism.) Indeed, the assumed common ancestor of all living things needed to have beneficial mutations on an incredible scale over an impossible amount of time. The evolutionary tree of life is increasingly shown to be untenable.In paleoanthropology, alleged transitional forms between humans and apes are called hominins. Most are evolutionary dead ends, and much is made of little because things like Lucy, H. habilis, and others were assembled from bits and pieces scattered over wide area, and other specimens submitted for approval are unconvincing and based on the faulty presuppositions that the other versions actually existed.Neanderthal man was discussed and the concept itself evolved over the years. Originally, he was a transitional form that was brutish, but now he is acknowledged to have been fully human.Appeals to geology and radiometric dating are of no help to evolution and deep time.The fake science about human-chimp DNA similarities are one of the first subjects examined in the genetics section of Dismantled. The original genome sequencing was risibly bad science at the beginning. Today, evidence shows that the similarities are actually closer to eighty-five percent between humans and chimpanzees. That is far too low for evolutionary purposes.We also learn that Mitochondrial Eve (not exactly the real Eve of the Bible) studies show one ancestor for humanity on the female side. Y-Chromosome Adam is not helping matters for evolutionists. Interestingly, the secular Adam and Eve are within the same time span. Genetic clocks are winding down, and genetic entropy rates show that if Earth was as old as claimed, and that if evolution happened the way naturalists maintain, humans should have gone extinct long ago. The biblical model postulates that Adam, Eve, other created kinds were genetically rich and capable of producing variations and adaptations. The biblical model is supported by honest scientific research. That is, when assumptions and doubletalk are stripped away and the evidence is honestly examined.Racism is common when different ethnic groups encounter one another. Darwin (whose only earned degree was in theology) ignored the biblical statement in Acts 17:26 that indicates only one race. Naturally, his own white European group was the most highly evolved. While the word raceis used as a convenience, the scientific fact fits the Bible: humans are ninety-nine percent genetically identical, and there are no races.I reckon these points have given you some things to consider, and I hope they prompt you to get the disc. No, I am not being paid or rewarded for writing this; Back2Genesis does not even know I exist (until I send them a link to this review). By the way, for those who want references for points made in the movie as well as additional resources, those are found at the same place that you can order the movie, Dismantled Evolution.They may have a follow-up movie, and I'm looking forward to that.Looking for a comment area? You can start your own conversation by using the buttons below!Stars come and go, or so they say. The most spectacular exit from the cosmic stage is by a supernova. Astronomers have several ideas on how stars make their exits, but nobody has actually seen a star form.Galaxy NGC 2525 with supernova SN 2018gvCredits:NASA, ESA, and A. Riess (STScI/JHU)and the SH0ES team;acknowledgment: M. Zamani (ESA/Hubble) Modified at Big Huge Labs (usage does not imply endorsement of site contents by anyone)Sure, secular astronomers and cosmologists make claims that there are "stellar nurseries" and such, but those are based on presuppositions of cosmic evolution. Biblical creationists know that God created the stars during Creation Week, and some creationists think that it maybe possible for a star to form because God also created the laws of physics, elements, and all, but that would not really be a big deal. There is no empirical evidence of stars forming. Because creation is running down, we have seen and will continue to see stars expiring.Well, there goes another star, disappearing into the night as if it had never existed. For an entire year, Hubble scientists used the space telescope to record snapshots of SN 2018gv a supernova (SN) or exploded star. Experts then edited those images into a NASA video showing the fast fading of the supernova. It s hard not to wonder, given the astronomical number of stars in the night sky, why we witness more stars fade than form. For that matter, has anyone ever seen a star form?Koichi Itagaki, an amateur astronomer, first found the exploding star SN 2018gv as a super-bright spot amid spiral galaxy NGC 2525 in January 2018.1 Professional astronomers then trained the Hubble Space Telescope onto the fast fading object. Reporting on the new video, NASA news described the fading process:If you've taken a shine to this article, the rest can be found at "A Supernova and the Scripture".Looking for a comment area? You can start your own conversation by using the buttons below!Quite a spell back, I picked up a book called Dragon Teethbecause I had a hankering for a Western story. As I commenced to reading it, I realized that this story touches on some areas of my interest and study: dinosaur fossils.Original image from Pixabay / PublicDomainPicturesDr. Crichton (he obtained his MD but turned to writing instead) had several manuscripts stored and in process when he died in 2008. Some of them were completed by others, sometimes drawing from his notes. Dragon Teethwritten in 1974, but was discovered much later, retouched, and subsequently published in 2017.Dragon Teethis about the early years of American paleontology. No dinosaurs running rampant biting heads off. Only fossils. It is a historical novel based on actual events in what is known as the Bone Wars. (It is interesting that Crichton used the word dragonseveral times in the text. Biblical creationists believe there is a great deal of historical evidence that dinosaurs existed with humans. No, I am not suggesting that Michael was a creationist!) The protagonist, William Johnson, met the two bone war rivals Othniel Charles Marsh and Edward Drinker Cope. They were real, but Johnson was not.There are many novels based on historical events, and some authors attempt to be reasonably accurate with the actual people and settings. Dragon Teethhas references if y'all get the notion to read actual history (some source material is in the public domain, you can start searching at the Internet Archiveif you takes such a notion). Similarly, the movie Allegedwas about the Scopes trial but had fictional people. It was far more historically accurate than the detestable Inherit the Wind which some people consider a documentary! Many books and movies have fictional elements but are otherwise accurate.I said earlier that I obtained this book because I wanted a Western story. As it progressed, the Indian Wars, Wyatt and Morgan Earp, the town of Deadwood, and more were in the story. It definitely had some excitement in addition to the history. If you want a diversion and a bit of learning, Dragon Teethmay very well be for you. The profanity is limited, and sexual situations are implied they are worse on network television. Also, if you want to see a presentation on the Marsh and Cope rivalry as well as their actual discoveries, see "The Dinosaur Bone Wars".Looking for a comment area? You can start your own conversation by using the buttons below!Want to come over and see my place? I designed it with you in mind, and if you step inside, I can show you a good time. As a matter of fact, you probably heard about my reputation for pleasing women...Credit: Wikimedia Commons / JJ Harrison(CC BY-SA 3.0)How did you like my impression of the great bowerbird? I've seen human versions of the male bowerbird, and it's tempting anthropomorphize by assigning human behaviors and my values to a critter, so let's move on.These are down 'Straya and New Guinea way, and are grouped with certain catbirds that have a greater sense of morality (sorry, there I go again), what with being monogamous and all. There are ten species of bowerbirds, and they get their name because, well, they build bowers. They work hard to make them aesthetically pleasing. If you set down your ring and can't find it later, it may not have been a packrat that picked it up, but a bowerbird getting the place all gussied up. Yes, they use a variety of things to decorate their bachelor pads.It's also interesting that in their efforts to impress the womenfolk, they use modified visual perspective in building bowers. Humans do this through creativity and choice, bowerbirds have it built in. They also were designed by our Creator to have complex courtship rituals. Darwinists claim that all this is evidence for evolution, but some of us need more than your say-so, Chuck.Before the discovery of bowerbirds optical effects, only humans were known to design optical illusions. But does the bowerbird possess an artistic sense like humans?While a common bird to Australia, the bowerbird shows an uncommon ability to design bowers structures that look like two-sided thatch huts to impress possible mates. The males spend much of their days gathering material to build and decorate the bowers with items from sticks and acorns to flowers and shells. The better the bower, the better the chance of winning a mate.For the rest of the article, see "Bowerbird s Artistic Sense".Looking for a comment area? You can start your own conversation by using the buttons below!Sometimes people are a mite casual in their use of the word dinosaur, using it to mean wooly mammoths, sauropods, plesiosaurs, pterosaurs, and so on. It is easy group them all together, though, because they lived at the same time.Credit: Flickr / theilr(CC BY-SA 2.0)Many believers in dust-to-dinosaur evolution insist that certain dinosaurs evolved into birds. They tend to "see" signs of feathers in fossils, ignoring other (and more reasonable) explanations. Some extravagant claims have been made regarding filaments on pterosaurs, and then unwarranted guesswork was passed off as science. What's a Darwin devotee to do when the same things are not unique to pterosaurs, but are found in dinosaur fossils as well as carcasses of marine reptiles, sharks, and the like? It would be helpful to admit that the Creator made these things, and to stop pretending that they are looking at skin collagen, not protofeathers.In December 2018, researchers claimed to have found featherlike structures in two specimens of pterosaurs.1 These appendages, called pycnofibres when found in pterosaurs, were said to resemble non-vaned group filaments and bilaterally branched filaments structures previously thought to be unique to maniraptoran dinosaurs and which have been previously used as evidence that some dinosaurs had feathers. The researchers claim that these pycnofibres are diagnostic of feathers. However, of the four types of pycnofibres they identified in one pterosaur, three were said to be similar to protofeathers previously thought to be unique to unrelated groups of dinosaurs. But why would all these diverse dinosaur protofeather types be present in one single pterosaur specimen? This paper compares decayed collagen fibres in marine fossils to these pterosaur pycnofibres and suggests that these integumentary structures are identical. But if these pterosaur pycnofibres are nothing more than decayed collagen fibres, so too are the three types of dinosaur protofeathers associated with it. This presents a challenge for those who choose to interpret dino fuzz as evidence of feathered dinosaurs.To read the rest of this very interesting, annoying (to evolutionists), and informative article, see "Feathered pterosaurs: ruffling the feathers of dinosaur evolution". You may also be interested in Dr. Jerry Bergman's article, "Pterosaur Feathers: Another Myth Exploded".Looking for a comment area? You can start your own conversation by using the buttons below!There are some things we know because we know them. You know? Thatis, we have some things we presuppose without verification. When we discoverthat we had something wrong, we are often surprised. Since this is humannature, it happens in science as well.Dr Sherry Mayo operating the XuMultra-high resolution X-ray microscopePhoto by Mark Fergus forCSIRO(CC BY 3.0)(Usage does not imply endorsement of sitecontents; this is a picture ofa scientist doing science stuff)If you study on it, things that are taken for granted and "conventional wisdom" can be overturned with a bit of research or testing. Sometimes that startles us reg'lar people, and I reckon it does the same for scientists.One example is that because of their presuppositions of deep time and evolution, carbon-14 dating of coal, diamonds and other items was slow in happening because they "knew" there would be no carbon in them. There was carbon in them after all, and those of us who support recent creation were vindicated.Scientists "know" that plastic bags are bad for the environment and allegedly contribute to global warming/climate change. Paper and cloth? Not so much. Someone got the notion to test those ideas, and the results were not as expected. Also, we are told that cattle (including their farms) contribute to global warming. Although people should follow the money because of a possible conflict of interest, some researchers found that if dairy cows were removed, the environmental impact would be small but other significant problems would result.You can read about these and some other interesting items by following the link to "Science Findings Can Be Counter-Intuitive".Looking for a comment area? You can start your own conversation by using the buttons below!A spell back, we saw how some of Darwin's disciples were erroneously asserting that a certain artery in the arm was evolution in action. That was a detailed example, and we can see that it was not simply an outlier.Mostly Made at FotoFuniaNumerous instances of fake science presented as evidence of molecules-to-magician evolution are seen here, with links to other sites for more information.. They presuppose that evolution happened, never questioning ifit happened, then assume that whatever they see in nature (or thinkthey see) helps them further understand it. Although we have been taught that evolution takes a very long time, somehow it is so flexible that rapid changes are conflated with evolution and used to support it.Except that there really is no actual evolution happening. Still, they conjure up the spirit of Darwin (blessed be!) to give themselves credibility and get money for their phony baloney jobs. Naturalism and denying the work of the Creator is more important to some sidewinders than actual science. They are sacrificing their minds as well as credible science.When critiques have been forbidden, lazy evolutionary biologists get away with incompetent scientific work and inept thinking.Here are more examples of a theme concluded by Dr Jerry Bergman in yesterday s post [linked in the reference in the first paragraph]: claims of evolution occurring before our eyes fall apart when examined. Why don t other evolutionists pour shame on such lazy thinkers within their camp? The evolution they re seeing right before their eyes is in their dreams, because their eyes are closed when they ought to be working.To read the examples of this spooky stuff that passes as evolutionary science, fly on over to "Evolution in Action, or Evolutionist Inaction?" Bonus: Listen to the song "Hallow's Eve" by Holy Soldier.Looking for a comment area? You can start your own conversation by using the buttons below!A common falsehood spread by those with atheism spectrum disorder and other anti-creationists is that biblical creationists do not publish i...

TAGS:Piltdown Superman 

<<< Thank you for your visit >>>

Hot Websites