Inverted Alchemy: An Integral Economy

Time 2020-12-16 08:03:14

Web Name: Inverted Alchemy: An Integral Economy

WebSite: http://www.invertedalchemy.com

ID:135786

Keywords:

Alchemy,Inverted,An,

Description:

Wealth and the metrics used to measure it have become increasingly devoid of the dimensionality intrinsic to humanity. Welcome to the discussion of a new vision and an alternative Ancient Future of Wealth.Through April 2020, the official recommendation by the Journalof the American Medical Association was unambiguous. Face masks should not be worn by healthyindividuals to protect themselves from acquiring respiratory infection becausethere is no evidence to suggest that face masks worn by healthy individuals areeffective in preventing people from becoming ill. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2762694Part of that lack of evidence in fact showed thatcloth facemasks actually increased influenza-linked illness.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/In contravention to established science, States,municipalities and businesses have violated the legal requirements for thepromulgation of medical counter measures during a public health emergencystating a belief that face masks limit the spread of SARS CoV-2. To date, not a single study has confirmedthat a mask prevented the transmission of, or the infection by SARS CoV-2.All parties mandating the use of facemasks are notonly willfully ignoring established science but are engaging in what amounts toa whole population clinical trial. Thisconclusion is reached by the fact that facemask use and COVID-19 incidence arebeing reported in scientific opinion pieces promoted by the United StatesCenters for Disease Control and Prevention and others.https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/cloth-face-cover-guidance.htmlSocial distancing of up to 6 feet has been promoted as a means ofpreventing person-to-person transmission of influenza-like viruses. While one study (Werner E. Bischoff, Katrina Swett, Iris Leng,Timothy R. Peters, Exposure to Influenza Virus Aerosols During Routine PatientCare,The Journal of InfectiousDiseases, Volume 207, Issue 7, 1 April 2013, Pages 1037 1046,https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jis773) hypothesizedthat infection could happen in a 6 foot range, the study explicitly states thatperson-to-person transfer was not tested and viability of the virus at 6feet was not even a subject of the investigation. That did not stop the misrepresentation ofthe study to be used as the basis for an unverified medical counter measure of socialdistancing. To date, no study has establishedthe efficacy of social distancing to modify the transmission of SARSCoV-2. Public health officials havereferenced: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5907354/#CR43In contravention to established science, States,municipalities and businesses have violated the legal requirements for thepromulgation of medical counter measures during a public health emergencystating a belief that social distancing of a healthy population limits thespread of SARS CoV-2. To date, not asingle study has confirmed that social distancing of any population preventedthe transmission of, or the infection by SARS CoV-2.It is unlawful under the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 41 et seq., toadvertise that a product or service can prevent, treat, or cure human diseaseunless you possess competent and reliable scientific evidence, including, whenappropriate, well-controlled human clinical studies, substantiating that the claimsare true at the time they are made. As aresult, every party promoting the use of face masks is violating the FTC Act.Further, under 21 CFR 50.24 et seq., it is unlawful toconduct medical research (even in the case of emergency) without a series ofsteps taken to:a.Establish the research with aduly authorized and independent institutional review board;b.Secure informed consent of allparticipants including a statement of risks and benefits; and,c.Engage in consultation with thecommunity in which the study is to be conducted.All of these laws have been broken. All relevant authorities in the United Statesmust cease and desist the use of face masks until the matters above arerectified.Oh, and did I mention that the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment states:"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."Forcing someone to "believe" that a thing might work not based on facts but based on a belief alone is tantamount to a religion and is prohibited without limitation. Not even Jacobson alters this fact.xOn April 22, 2020, I provided the evidence that our current SARS coronaviruspandemic and the set of symptoms branded COVID-19 were the directconsequence of illegal actions coordinated through the United States Departmentof Health and Human Services and their primary conspiring entities the NationalInstitute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ( NIAID headed by Dr. AnthonyFauci) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). My evidence and complaint was submitted tothe Office of the Inspector General on April 23, 2020 and to the U.S.Department of Justice COVID legal team identified by U.S. Attorney General WilliamBarr coordinated by U.S. Attorneyfor the Eastern District of Michigan Matthew Schneider and Assistant Attorneyfor the Justice Department s Civil Rights Division Eric Dreiband. None of the aforementioned and none of themyriad of attorneys with whom I ve spoken about the heinous abuse of publictrust have had the courage to stand up for We The People.Having indicated that this deathknell to the U.S. economic engine driven by small businesses was the result ofa criminal conspiracy then, it was with inevitable resolve that I awaited DanielO Day s final act his justification for charging $2,340 per patient for theDepartment of Health and Human Services collusive priced remdesivir. He delivered the blow with brutal honesty. He didn t lie about the cost of R D (paidfor by the U.S. taxpayer). He didn t lieabout the laborious clinical trials (done with COMPLETE exemption fromliability courtesy of the U.S. FDA's Emergency Use Authorizationprovided in February for SARS CoV-2 interventions). He simply stated that, in collusion with thecompound s inventors (the Department of Health and Human Services) the companyestablished a price that was considerably less than the 4-5 days of hospitalizationthat their drug might, in certain random instances, reduce. His letter on June 29, 2020 is the coup de grâce in the chain of evidence that beganin 2003 and ended with the Pandemic Depression of 2020. And for your edification, the letter is referencedhere: https://www.gilead.com/news-and-press/press-room/press-releases/2020/6/an-open-letter-from-daniel-oday-chairman--ceo-gilead-sciences.Gilead Sciences a donor to California Governor Gavin Newsom;California domiciled biotech; darling of Dr. Anthony Fauci s NIAID; accusedpatent thief; and so much more has finally succeeded in doing what Dr. Fauciand the SARS coronavirus co-conspirators never could have pulled off withoutthe national meltdown by State of Emergency.Under the orchestration of the dishonorable lawyer, turned lobbyist,turned Secretary of Health and Human Services Alex M Azar II, with PresidentTrump s reckless confidence in Dr. Anthony Fauci to willfully lie to andterrorize the U.S. population, and with Governor Gavin Newsom insisting thatthe largest economy in the country and 5th largest economy in theworld should be sacrificed on the altar of the industrial pharmaceutical industry smacabre obsession with fear and blood-thirsty greed, Gilead now reaps thespoils of what was the Great American Experiment.As the rest of the world watches Johns Hopkins Universitydata race with ever more positive bullshit tests peddled by none other than theco-conspiring CDC (and their patented restriction on RT-PCR that did notrestrain the rest of the world but made independence impossible in the United States),whole countries fail to match in the entire pandemic one day of testing inthe lands of Newsom, Northam, Wolf, and Cuomo.Why? Well, as I showed in April,when you control the means of establishing the narrative, when you report that thisvirus doesn t instill sufficient fear to justify financial aspirations forpharmaceutical intervention, and when you restrict independent testing datathat demonstrates that SARS CoV-2 like strains have probably been circulatinglong before December 2019, you get to maintain control of the narrative. And PROFIT from it.Never mind the fact that in over half of the patientssubjected to Dr. Fauci s wonder drug generously offered to the world, seriousadverse events cast a shadow on whether the few days of decreased hospitalizationwere worth the risk.Prof Simon Maxwell, Professorof Clinical Pharmacology and Prescribing, University of Edinburgh, said: Theresearch is interesting but doesn t prove anything at this point: the data arefrom a small and uncontrolled study. Remdesivir is currently being assessed inlarge scale clinical studies, which will be critical in determining whether itis a safe and effective treatment for COVID-19. This is not least because therewere some adverse events (60%) reported in the current study, some of themserious (23%), including multiple organ failure, septic shock, acute kidneyinjury, and hypotension. But never mind this. The lobbyingindustry that put Alex Azar into his role in Trump s administration of criminalco-conspirators has its win. And it onlycost us our country.Oh, and as of the date of this publication, NO attorney, NODepartment of Justice official, and NO judge has had the moral or ethical spineto take this matter on. So, if you reholding your breath for Q, a Kennedy, or a savior, don t. Breathlessness is a symptom of COVID-19 andyou ll just add to the body count.Some of this information was submitted to the Office of the Inspector General for the United States Department of Health and Human Services on April 22, 2020Request forInvestigation - Possible Sherman Act ViolationUnited States Department of Health andHuman Services Centers for Disease Control and PreventionRobert R Redfield, et al.National Institute of Allergy and InfectiousDiseasesAnthony Stephen Fauci, et al.Governors of All States IssuingExecutive Orders abridging the 1st Amendment of the ConstitutionUniversity of North Carolina, ChapelProfessor Ralph Baric, et al.And unknown PartiesOn April 25, 2003, the United States Department of Health andHuman Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (hereinafter, CDC )filed an application for a United States patent (Application Number US46592703P,subsequently issued as U.S. Patent 7,776,521 and U.S. Patent 7,220,852) entitled Coronavirus isolatedfrom humans . Claim 3 A method of detecting a severe acuterespiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in a sample and, Claim4 - A kit for detecting a severe acute respiratory syndrome-associatedcoronavirus (SARS-CoV) in a sample , provided the CDC with a statutory marketexclusion right the detection of and sampling for severe acute respiratorysyndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV).Securing this right afforded the CDC exclusive right to research,commercially exploit, or block others from conducting activities involvingSARS-CoV. On September 24, 2018, the CDC failed to pay the required maintenancefees on this patent and their rights expired. From April2003 until September 2018, the CDC owned SARS-CoV, its ability to be detectedand the ability to manufacture kits for its assessment. During this 15-yearperiod, the effect of the grant of this right ruled unconstitutional in 2013by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Association for MolecularPathology et al. v. Myriad Genetics meant that the commercialexploitation of any research or commercial activity in the United Statesinvolving SARS-CoV would constitute an infringement of CDC s illegal patent.It appearsthat, during the period of patent enforcement and after the Supreme Courtruling confirming that patents on genetic material was illegal, the CDC and NationalInstitute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases led by Anthony Fauci (hereinafter NIAID and "Dr Fauci", respectively) entered intotrade among States (including, but not limited to working with EcohealthAlliance Inc.) and with foreign nations (specifically, the Wuhan Institute ofVirology and the Chinese Academy of Sciences) through the 2014 et seq NationalInstitutes of Health Grant R01AI110964 to exploit their patent rights. It further appears that, during the period of patent enforcement and afterthe Supreme Court ruling confirming that patents on genetic material were illegal, the CDC and National Institute of Allergy and InfectiousDiseases (hereinafter NIAID ) entered into trade among States (including, butnot limited to working with University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill) and withforeign nations (specifically, the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the ChineseAcademy of Sciences represented by Zheng-Li Shi) through U19AI109761(Ralph S. Baric), U19AI107810 (Ralph S. Baric), and National Natural ScienceFoundation of China Award 81290341 (Zheng-Li Shi) et al. It further appears that, during the period of patent enforcement and afterthe Supreme Court ruling confirming that patents on genetic material wasillegal, the CDC and NIAID entered into trade among States (including, butnot limited to working with University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill) and withforeign nations to conduct chimeric construction of novel coronavirus materialwith specific virulence properties prior to, during, and followingthe determination made by the National Institutes for Health in October 17,2014 that this work was not sufficiently understood for its biosecurity andsafety standards.In this inquiry, it is presumed that the CDC and its associateswere: a) fully aware of the work being performed using their patentedtechnology; b) entered into explicit or implicit agreements includinglicensing, or other consideration; and, c) willfully engaged one or moreforeign interests to carry forward the exploitation of their proprietarytechnology when the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed that such patents were illegaland when the National Institutes of Health issued a moratorium on suchresearch.The aforementioned items appear to constitute, contract,combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, as defined under15 US Code 1.Under 15 U.S. Code 1 (theSherman Antitrust Act) Everycontract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, inrestraint of trade orcommerceamong the severalStates,orwith foreign nations, is declared to be illegal. Everypersonwhoshall make any contract or engage in any combination or conspiracy herebydeclared to be illegal shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and, on convictionthereof, shall be punished by fine not exceeding $100,000,000 if a corporation,or, if any otherperson,$1,000,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding10 years, or by both said punishments, in the discretion of the court. Reportedly,in January 2018, the U.S. Embassy in China sent investigators to WuhanInstitute of Virology and found that, Duringinteractions with scientists at the WIV laboratory, they noted the new lab hasa serious shortage of appropriately trained technicians and investigatorsneeded to safely operate this high-containment laboratory. The WashingtonPost reported that this information was contained in a cable dated 19January 2018. Over a year later, in June 2019, the CDC conducted an inspection of FortDetrick s U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases(hereinafter USAMRIID ) and ordered it closed after alleging that theirinspection found biosafety hazards. A report in the journal Naturein 2003 (423(6936): 103) reported cooperation between CDC and USAMRIID oncoronavirus research followed by considerable subsequent collaboration. TheCDC, for what appear to be the same type of concern identified in Wuhan,elected to continue work with the Chinese government while closing the U.S. Armyfacility.Reportedly, on December 31, 2019, theChinese government informed the World Health Organization (WHO) that a numberof cases of suspected coronavirus-associated SARS cases were being treated inthe area of Wuhan. The CDC reported thefirst case of SARS-CoV like illness in the United States in January 2020 withthe CDC s Epidemic Intelligence Service reporting 650 clinical cases and 210tests. Given that the suspected pathogenwas first implicated in official reports on December 31, 2019, one can onlyconclude that CDC: a) had the mechanism and wherewithal to conduct tests toconfirm the existence of a novel coronavirus or, b) did not have saidmechanism and falsely reported the information in January. It tests credulityto suggest that the WHO or the CDC could manufacture and distribute tests fora novel pathogen when their own subsequent record on development anddeployment of tests has been shown to be without reliability. Notwithstanding, the CDC and WHOelected to commit to a narrative of a novel coronavirus exhibiting propertiesthat were anticipated in the U.S. Patent 7,618,802 issued to the University ofNorth Carolina Chapel Hill s Ralph Baric and, in the absence of testingprotocols, elected to insist that SARS-CoV-2 was the pathogen responsible forconditions that were consistent with moderate to severe acute respiratorysyndrome. On March 4,2020, California Governor Gavin Newsome appears to have violated the law of theState of California by issuing Executive Order N-33-20 based on the threat ofCOVID-19 with no evidence that such threat existed as confirmed by serology orconfirmed immunologic evidence. TheGovernment Code sections cited in the Order (Government Code sections 8567,8627, and 8665) require that criteria be met which do not include the threat of any condition but evidence of said condition. At that time, neither the CDCnor the WHO had sufficient testing in place to: a) confirm and isolate a novelcoronavirus from other coronaviruses; b) California did not have pathologydata to suggest that an epidemic was imminent; and, c) the rest of the UnitedStates was equally incapable of making any such assessment as a result of theaforementioned conspiring parties actions.Governor Newsome s Executive Order, followed by numerous other similarorders, all are based on the threat of a thing that may or may not exist.Around March12, 2020, in an effort to enrich their own economic interests by way ofsecuring additional funding from both Federal and Foundation actors, the CDC and NIAID s Dr Fauci elected to suspend testing and classify COVID-19 by capricioussymptom presentation alone. Not surprisingly,this was necessitated by the apparent fall in cases that constitutedDr. Fauci s and others criteria for depriving citizens of their 1stAmendment rights. At present, thestandard according to the Council of State and TerritorialEpidemiologists Interim-20-ID-01 for COVID-19 classification is:In outpatient or telehealth settingsat least two of the following symptoms: fever (measured or subjective), chills,rigors, myalgia, headache, sore throat, new olfactory and taste disorder(s) ORat least one of the followingsymptoms: cough, shortness of breath, or difficulty breathing OR Severerespiratory illness with at least one of the following: Clinical or radiographic evidenceof pneumonia, or Acute respiratory distresssyndrome (ARDS). AND Noalternative more likely diagnosis Laboratory Criteria for Reporting Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in aclinical specimen using a molecular amplification detection test. Detection of specific antigen in aclinical specimen. Detection of specific antibody inserum, plasma, or whole blood indicative of a new or recent infection.**serologic methods for diagnosis are currently being definedAfter inflicting grave harm to thecitizens of the United States of America in economic hardships resulting fromtheir allegation of an epidemic or pandemic , the CDC and the NIAID setforth, and the President of the United States and various Governors in therespective States promulgated, standards for lifting conditions in violation ofthe 1st Amendment to the Constitution that serve exclusively toenrich them. Both the presence of avaccine or treatment and, or, the development of testing both that solelybenefit the possible conspiring parties and their co-conspirators are set asa condition for re-opening the country. This appears to be an unambiguous violation of theSherman Act and, if so, should be prosecuted immediately to the full extent of the law.Additional information is available upon request.Submitted this 22nd of April, 2020Dr. David E. Martin all Whistleblower Rights andProtections ReservedWhen the U.S. Congressional Pujo Committee investigatedthe conspiracy of interlocking directorates (the fact that multiple corporateboards were made up of the same people across multiple industries includingones with conflicts of interest) in 1912 and 1913, they realized that, in thedecades following the Civil War, the United States had become effectivelycontrolled (through its monetary system) by a few life insurance and bankinginterests. The mechanisms were very transparent. Wages were set to be barely sufficient to motivatepersistence of labor. Not surprisingly,the knowledge of labor costs was shared by, you guessed it, directors who gotinside knowledge of each other s businesses and could thereby control the laborsupply. Consumption was encouraged tokeep people addicted to whatever was new or modern . And all of this was an elaborate schemeconcocted to enrich the life insurance industry and their capital beneficiaries banks. And why do I call them beneficiaries? Simple.The principal beneficiary of the life insurance payout in the rareinstance that happens is the banks who hold unpaid debt both consumer creditand mortgages. To this day, have youever wondered why purchasing a home often involves the usurious practice ofalso buying Private Mortgage Insurance (PMI)?That s because the real beneficiary of your home purchase is the: a)bank that creates your debt asset; and, b) the insurer who seldom, if ever,pays out.To keep it simple here s how the scam worked thenAND WORKS NOW!1.Keep people paid just at the margin of enough butencourage them to live just a little beyond their means to ensure thatindebtedness was persistent and would incentivize indentured obligations;2.Encourage credit - particularly in mortgages by incentivizing home ownership for the purpose of manufacturing debt assets for banks;3.Sell life insurance to settle indebtedness in deathnever telling the public how much present value was lost in meeting actuarialobligations in death; and,4.Set the maturity of life insurance to lead many peopleto buy products that never would pay out in death (term policies).In my film, American R/evolution (https://winderwebdesign.com/davidmartin/american-r-evolution/) a two hour history of the death denominated U.S. economy - I discuss the thinlyveiled control that life insurance has had on our country since the CivilWar. So, as I was musing about whomight be benefiting from the charade playing out before us now and in which weare all thought to be simpletons, I wondered how much has changed. Why not, I thought, read HouseResolution 6312 recently introduced by Congress entitled the COVID 19Relief for Small Businesses Act of 2020 . Heralded as a landmark rescue package for thebusinesses that employ an estimated 90% of America, this $350 billion out ofthe $2 trillion package (yes, you should pause and think about how horrific themismatch ratio is), I was optimistic that I d see the best interest of SmallBusiness as the leading priority.Then came the bad news. Before payroll for small business is even mentioned,the real beneficiaries are named. Have alook for yourself. The $350 billionbailout is so that:1.banks can get their loans repaid;2.lifeinsurers can keep getting their premiums. See for yourself!Paying wages is the third priority.Where were any of the real or fake news outlets whenthey were fawning over this bill? That sright. NOT READING IT! Your tax dollarsare being spent on yet another banking and life insurance protection racket!Ms.Velázquezintroduced thefollowing bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small BusinessBe it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of theUnited States of America in Congress assembled,SECTION 1.SHORT TITLE; TABLE OFCONTENTS.(a)Short Title. This Act may becited as the COVID 19 Relief for Small Businesses Act of 2020 .2.BUSINESS STABILIZATION DIRECTLOAN PROGRAM.(a)In General. The Administrator of theSmall Business Administration shall carry out a program to make loans directlyto eligible borrowers.(b)Eligible Borrower Defined. In thissection, the term eligible borrower means a person who (1) is a smallbusiness concern as defined under section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632); and(2) is located in aState or territory of the United States with a confirmed or presumed positivecase of COVID 19.(c)Use Of Funds. In addition to the use ofproceeds currently permitted under section 7(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)), loans made under thissection may be used for the following purposes:(1) To make periodicpayments of principal and interest, for a period not to exceed 12months, on a loan or a loan guarantee made to an eligible borrower that meetsthe eligibility standards of such section 7(a).(2) To providebenefits to employees of the eligible borrower, including group lifeinsurance, disability insurance, sick leave, annual leave, educationalbenefits, paid family leave, or retirement benefits (including a pension planor IRA).(3) To pay wages toemployees of the eligible borrower, and related State and Federal payrolltaxes, except that loan proceeds may not be used to pay amounts under agarnishment order issued by an agency of a State or Federal Government.People, this is NOT acceptable.With the Fed making trillions available for bank liquidity, with smallbusiness preserved so that they can keep paying loans and life insurance whenwill the complicity of this end?Since I recently learned that footnotes are not accessed by mostreaders, here s some information that you might like to see from the industrythat needs your taxpayer bailout. https://www.iii.org/fact-statistic/facts-statistics-life-insurance. Have a good look. These unfortunate firms reported: 2018 net incomeafter taxes for the life/annuity insurance industry fell 10.0 percent to $37.9billion, from $42.1 billion in 2017. Net income before capital gains fell 15.8percent in 2018, and a net realized capital gains loss of $4.7 billioncontributed to lower net income. Premiums and annuity considerations roseslightly in 2018, up 1.3 percent from 2017, as annuity premiums and depositsfell 6.1 percent. Expenses grew by 10.8 percent in 2018 following a drop in2017. Capital and surplus rose to $400.0 billion in 2018. Whileyou watch governors and Presidents around the world breathlessly recite deathcounts from the scourge that besets us that is credited with 10% of the normalpneumonia deaths reported during the same period; when you see that theonly data supporting social-distancing are computer models that were off by anorder of magnitude just one week ago; and when, god-forbid, you look atthe Center for Responsive Politics data that shows that one lobbying firm(and only one of their lobbyists) is engaged by 55 clients including most ofthe major life insurers, bio-tech pharmaceutical companies, and non-profits thatinclude CDC Foundation partners, don t think for a moment that the branding ofCOVID-19 is for your health s sake!informed:WatchAmerican R/evolution (https://winderwebdesign.com/davidmartin/american-r-evolution/)share this information with a public that is playing into the Kabuki Theatrethat will end up with nothing but destruction!I m writing this from the vantage point of the U.S. medicalservices industry (please note, I m not falling for the healthcare BS). I m sick and tired of the constant drumbeatof sob stories about ventilators, gowns, and facemasks. Too few hospital beds. Scarcity running amok!Now mind you, I m by no means suggesting that hardworking doctors,nurses, EMTs, and staff within the medical field are in fact facingdisproportionate burdens courtesy of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) and that some ofthese burdens include equipment shortfalls.But this is not because of a virus. This is part of a complex medical supplyindustry problem that seeks to maximize billable dollars (and, as a result,profits) while failing to consider preparation for health crises. Medical professionals are suffering from anindustrial model that seeks to supply high margin products for maximum profit not for health of patient or staff. Thisis made worse by the reality that, in the U.S., nearly 1/3 of all expendituresare directed to hospitals[1] the very location least equipped to respond to large scale infections.In one of the few moments that I agree with President DonaldTrump, he s absolutely correct in calling for restraint on Governor AndrewCuomo s insistence on needing 30,000 ventilators. Governors Cuomo and California s GavinNewsome have both blindly led the country in recklessly relying upon (and thenfailing to adjust to the retraction of) UK s Imperial College Professor Neil Ferguson s2006 influenza model published in Nature[2]which set in motion panic-inducing estimates of morbidity and mortality thatwere baseless. None of the assumptionson Ferguson s model have been validated in any transmissible disease and havebeen categorically disproven in his computer simulation of Pandemic.There are too many points for me to make in this post but Iwant to make two.First, if you re serious about the plight of the medicalstaff, stop blaming the virus for material shortages. With price gouging collusion betweensuppliers, hospitals, and, most egregiously health insurance companies, thereare insufficient supplies in this moment.MBAs from America s leading institutions advocate for just-in-timemanufacturing, logistics, procurement, and use.Guess what! THEY GOT IT WRONG. Just-in-time got wobbly when Chinesefactories shut down in January but none of them got the hint that maybe, a nationalstockpile of masks, gowns, and gloves would be prudent. Motley Fool published a summary of the top health insurancecompanies in 2019[3] remember, before the crisis . These charitiesracked up $454 billion with a medical cost ratio of 84%. And hospitals you know, the ones who can tbuy masks and gloves they have seen their profits soar over 27% since 2013. When you hear about failures to have beds,ventilators, masks, and gowns, ask yourself if any of HCA s record-breakingrevenue could have been directed to preparedness.In America, we ve built a system where we have placed inordinatereliance on hospitals as points of care and, while ludicrously profitable withhealth insurance and medical supply industry collusion, our short term, just-in-timebusiness models have enriched investors and bitten us in our collectiverespiratory tracts (in this case).At no point will you hear Governors nor the President pointout that it was the business model of medical service delivery not thevirus that rendered us impotent with the patient onslaught. And if public officials and medicalprofessionals had thoughtfully critiqued the bullshit science of ImperialCollege, they wouldn t have had the run on hospitals that are you ready forthis overrun hospitals!!! I ll tellyou I told you so down the road but, here goes We won t fix our brokenfor-profit medical cabal in the wake of SARS-CoV-2 we ll make it lesseffective and more profitable to the speculators who prey on a populace thatstays indoors, eats crap, and goes to the ER when their diseases alarm.Second, watch out for this In a few weeks, we ll start slapping ourselves on ourcollective backs with the ridiculous narrative that social distancing worked. It didn t. The pandemic model was wrong. It was wrong when it was promoted, theinterventions were draconian and ill informed, the economic devastation islasting, and we ll be told that we suffered for the common good. Like every other forecast apocalypse, we are usingsimplistic models of complexity to identify problems, and then, when the skydoesn t fall, we take credit for that which had nothing to do with ourreflexive behavior.I ve been an outspoken critic of predictive mathematicalmodeling for my entire professional life.It s flawed in its teaching, implementation, and interpretation. Tragically, we ve associated math withintelligence but I heartily commend your reading of my diatribes on theeugenics-inspired intelligence obsession that we have in our society.[4] Suffice it to say that we use numbers largeor precise (and in some cases both) to bamboozle the public into thinkingthat someone checked. Tragically, no onedid. We re not near an apex of disease we re just getting more people tested.New York s 23,000 hospital beds are not laden with COVID-19. In fact, less than 10% are currentlyconscripted to the coronavirus. Andwhile there s no question that this SARS outbreak has tragically cost the livesand livelihoods of many, the thousands of mortalities have not equivalentlymattered when it s other all-cause mortalities at stake. But what we ve done as a society to destroylivelihoods of the present workforce and the unaccounted disruption to theeducation of generation is incalculable.We ve just trained a billion school-aged children that fearjustifies panic which results in social distancing. Do you really think a generation addicted toiPhones, SnapChat, and TikTok needed to learn that lesson more? In a world where our most complex challengesrequire natural intelligence the capacity to discern reality and adapt withinit we ve relied on eugenics artificial intelligence which seeksto simplify complexity into binary code.This won t be the last time politicians and their patronsdecide to pull this stunt. This may bethe last time that it occurs without them also disrupting the electronic communicationsgrid which will simply reify our acquiescence to their power unless we choosea different path.[1] Andrea M. Sisko and others, National HealthExpenditure Projections, 2018 27: Economic and Demographic Trends DriveSpending and Enrollment Growth, HealthAffairs38 (3) (2019).A film about the U.S. economy that will make sense out of where we are now. Watch the video here.For a different narrative on the events of the past 12 years and how they impact our world, take a journey across the world in my new novel, Coup d'TwelveMake sure you catch the latest on the Heritable Innovation TrustAnd make sure you read James Quilligan's elegant summary of the role of the CommonsInspired by Inverted Alchemy and the dreams of a more conscious humanity, please engage in the vision of Peter Buffett and Akon with whom this inspired piece came into being...see the March 19, 2009 post or click the image belowInvert the Alchemy

TAGS:Alchemy Inverted An 

<<< Thank you for your visit >>>

Hot Websites