BrownWatch

Time 2020-11-11 16:04:14

Web Name: BrownWatch

WebSite: http://www.brown-watch.com

ID:112538

Keywords:

BrownWatch,

Description:

Along with John Lewis Black people need to bury moral suasion as a tool of liberation from racism white supremacy (RWS). Here now, at this point in history attempting to transform or reform racists – white individuals who either function as psychopaths in their interactions with Black people or believe they must dominate them to in order to survive and seek to have master-servant relations with them - is entirely pathological. Dr. Frances Cress Welsing explained in this white over Black system of domination Black people “are in a continuous state of checkmate” and are currently in a “losing streak that is centuries long.” [MORE]Thus far, all persons such as Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, the BPP, Marcus Garvey, Elijah Mohammed, Nelson Mandela and many courageous others who have attempted to establish justice and/or to eliminate racism white supremacy have failed.’ [MORE] Essentially all strategies including moral suasion and all statist politics have failed to decode the white supremacist/racist playbook and have been met with crushing defeat. Museums and cemeteries are filled with our dead and gone and fucked up memories and Blacks should leave them there and learn from it. Dead ass concepts and old heroes died so we don’t have to keep re-trying failed experiments.FUNKTIONARY states “a slave is one who waits for someone else to free him”Recent episodes are also learning opportunities for Black people to witness and overstand that their relationship with the government [whether they perceive it as happy or consensual] is non-voluntary, non-contractual and not reciprocal. Complete obedience to government authority in exchange for what again? The “social contract” is illogical bullshit, unsupported by reality. Authorities are not solving Black people’s problems they are causing them. Look out your window, cops aren’t looking for criminals they are looking for us. But that is not what Doc Rivers was talking about above and that is not what this article is about.John Lewis’ politics always involved an appeal to themoral suasionof racists.Like many confused victims of racism/white supremacy Lewis did not view racism white supremacy as a system of white over Black domination and vast unequal power. In a quest for [artificial] “equality” and equal protection from the government he viewed racism as a battle for civil rights against bigots and bigotry. Hence his goals were a moral quest for respect from racists as he and many other black advocates hoped to secure legal freedoms and reform the bad attitudes, behavior and hurtful speech and conduct of racists. Through articulate and moving speeches and non-violence he attempted to transform racists- as they appear to be the indirect target of his messaging and activities. Reformers continue to follow this model – and after every unsuccessful speech they cue up another thinking it will be the straw that breaks the camel’s back.Belief in somehow changing racists has led to suffering, it is aprison.Begging racists to change is flattering to them.Civil rights reformers fail to understand that there is no way to integrate racism white supremacy. Neely Fuller explains, Racism can either be practiced or not practiced." [MORE] It either exists or it doesn’t. Dr. Frances Cress Welsing further explained that ‘because Blacks and other non-white people have failed to understand the true meaning of racism white supremacy they have erroneously believed they could be integrated into the white supremacy system and depend upon racists to maximally develop Black children, communities, organizations and institutions and so forth in the same manner that white people promote their own maximal development and solve their own problems.’ [MORE] She explained that Black people must understand what the operatingsystem of racism white supremacyis and how it functions in order to disempower it and unplug themselves from it.Racism white supremacy isnota system of bigotry, discrimination, mean acts and minor inconveniencesrun by bigots.FUNKTIONARY defines:Racism White Supremacy - psychopathic degeneracy. 2) "The local and global power system and dynamic, structured and maintained by persons who classify themselves as white, whether consciously or subconsciously determined, which consists of patterns of perception, logic, symbol formation, thought, speech, action and emotional response, as conducted simultaneously in all areas of people activity (economics, education, entertainment, labour, law, politics, religion, sex and war); for the ultimate purpose of white genetic survival and to prevent white genetic annihilation on planet earth—a planet upon which the vast majority of people are classified as non-white (Black, Brown, Red and Yellow) by white skinned people, and all of the nonwhite people are genetically dominant (in terms of skin coloration) compared to the genetic recessive white skin people." [MORE] and [MORE]WelsingdescribedRacismasa behavioral system of survival whereby racists believe they must dominate Blacks and other non-whitesto survivethrough genocidal and genthanasiastic conduct in all areas of people activity.Welsingexplained thatmost white people consciously or subconsciously understand the following;White plus Black equals Colored.White plus Brown equals Colored.White plus Yellow equals Colored.[MORE] Although rarely discussed, white people are genetic recessive. It is scientific fact that Black is a genetically dominant trait.Whenever Black mixes with White, which is a recessive genetic trait, Black will dominate.In general, this means "whites" cannot reproduce a white child when they have sexual relations with non-whites. The so-called white "race" can and eventually will be replaced or "genetically annihilated" through such assimilation or social intermixing with non-whites. As white populations have been consistently declining, Black and Brown populations are surging. According to Welsing, ‘genetic annihilation is the fundamental motivation of racists, whether it is conscious and/or subconsciously determined. [MORE] Said "fear of replacement" and/orthefear of losing control over non-whites fuels the system ofwhite supremacy/racismandmotivatesracists to actgenocidallytowards non-whites intheirperceived "survival game" with non-whites. Welsing’scolor confrontation theoryexplained that the more the white population shrinks the worse its conduct toward non-whites will get. [MORE]A recent Reuterspoll reflects white people fear of replacement as 31% of participants agreed "America must protect and preserve its White European heritage” and 39 percent agreed with the statement that “White people are currently under attack in this country.” [MORE] Welsingstates:“Within the historic framework of Western civilization and culture (thecivilization and culture organized to prevent white genetic annihilation),allwhite peoples have the spoken or unspokenmandateto participateactively in their collective struggle for global white geneticsurvival.Thisspecifically means, of necessity, the murder and slaughter of Black andother non-white males whenever it is felt within the white collective to benecessary and, therefore, justified.” [MORE]Considering racism throughsuch a lens, Black people should easily understand that for racists to integrate with them ortoworkalongsideBlacks to maximally develop Black individuals, communities and economies,“wouldmean active white participation in white genocide.”[MORE] Welsingexplainedthat white supremacy is really “only a compensatory psychological adjustment for a genetic, numerical deficiency state.”When non-whites havesuch an understanding, ‘the white supremacy message can be evaluated and negated more readily. Thishelpsnon-whites todrop unrealistic expectations and disappointment andgain psychological liberation from the white ideological domination that negatively affects the total functioning of non-whites.’Racistssee themselves asthepermanent enemyof Blacksand Black people must wake up to that reality.At a press conference on WednesdayDoc Riverssaid“It’s amazing to me why we keep loving this country and this country does not love us back.”It’s not clear whetherDochadjustcome to this realization or whether he was simply baffled by the conduct of racists.To help undeceiveoverwhelmedvictims of racism white supremacy Neely Fulleroffereda basic theory to measureagainstreality,"most white people hate Black people. The reason that most whitepeople hate Black people is because whites are not Black people. Ifyou know this about white people, you need know little else. If youdo not know this about white people, virtually all else that you knowabout them will only confuse you."[MORE]He furtherexplained that ‘the quality of therelationshipbetween white people and black people is, and has been,a total disaster.’ He stated a racist cannot be humane in their relations with non-white people... Racists (whitesupremacists) are masters of deceit and violence. It is correct to expect them to be deceitful, and/or violent - either directly or indirectly. It is correct to expect them to be this way all the time.’ [MORE]Dr. Bobby Wright characterized the historical and ongoing treatment of Blacks by whites in all areas of people activity aspsychopathic. That is, in their relationships with Blacks, racists function as psychopaths. He states “One of the best methods that can be used to measure the psychopathic traits of the White race is observing and analyzing their universal overt behaviors and attitudes toward Blacks.”As stated by Wright, ‘the psychopath is an individual who is constantly in conflict with other persons or groups. He is unable to experience guilt, iscompletely selfish and callous, and has a total disregard for the rights of others.’Wright explains,‘Unlike other extreme pathological syndromes, only a very small percentage of psychopaths are committed to mental hospitals with another small percentage ending up in penal institutions. The majority of psychopaths function very well in society. They are generally average or above average in intelligence and have engaging personalities. In addition, they are usually very impressive and competent with no feelings of insecurities, anxieties, or any other manifestations or psychoneurosis. They appear to be very honest and humane, but really have no concern or commitment except to their own selfish interests. Psychopaths willconsistently make commitments that they have no intentions of keeping and show great indignation and anger when their integrity is questioned.Behavioral scientists generally agree that the outstanding characteristics of the psychopathic personality are the almost complete absence of ethical or moral development and an almost total disregard for appropriate patterns of behavior. Psychopaths know the difference between right and wrong but simply ignore the concept of right and wrong."‘ [MORE]FUNKTIONARY further defines the psychopathic racial personality as “yurugu” and explains that racists suffer from Weitko disease or a “patapathetic fascination with the exploitation and control of nature and exploitation and genocide of his fellow man.” Wright stated, ‘By ignoring these traits in racists (the lack of ethical and moral development) Blacks have made and are still making a tragic mistake in basing the worldwide Black liberation movement or black politics on moral suasion. It is pathological for Blacks to keep attempting to use moral suasion on a people who have no morality where race is the variable.' [MORE]Episode after episode racist individuals and cops are murdering or inflicting harm on non-white people.In contrast,itis rarefor a black police officer tomurder oruse excessive force against a white person.Over the past 60 years the number of violent incidents between Black cops and white citizens can be counted on your hands.Anon explains, “A black person whose power comes from a white institution will not be allowed to mistreat whites - unless he or she is following orders from more powerful whites. In a system of white supremacy, all whites are more powerful than blacks.A white supremacy system by its very NATURE forbids ALL non-white people - regardless of wealth, status, or position - from victimizing white people.”[MORE]Whether they are motivated by extinction, fear, jealously, hatred or something else, Racists practice racism because they have the power to do so. Racism involves the power of one race to impose its will upon another.Wright observed, “although the world is 90% non-white, everywhere one finds whites and blacks in close proximity to each other, whether it is Chicago or Zimbabwe, the whites are in control. Yet Blacks rarely question this extraordinary universal phenomenon which defies every know statistical law of probability.”[MORE]Dr. Amos Wilson, a true rebel to lionize, similarly stated, "[Blacks] must question how is it that a minority people [whites], a very small percentage of mankind, a people who are essentially resourceless in terms of their natural resources, maintain the power they have. Why is it that the peoples [Afrikans] whose lands contain the wealth of the earth are the poorest people? This implies that there must exist a political, social situation wherein the mental orientation of our people must be so structured that the power and the ability of the Europeans to rule this earth are continually maintained.' [MORE]Dr. Blynd explains, "Racismis not individualistic, but institutional, cultural, economic, political, linguistic, self-perpetuating and systematic."White Supremacy is a “power group dynamic” involving the relationship between whites and Blacks in a vast system of unequal power. It is economic discrimination by one group over and against another for the purposes of subjugation and/or maintaining the imbalance of power throughcooperative control,misinformation, indoctrination, genocide and oppression. [MORE]Fuller states, "in a socio-material system dominated by White Supremacists,all major decisions involving non-white people are made byWhite Supremacists. The White Supremacists are their bosses, their masters, and their major decision-makers.Whatever a Black person gets, and/or is allowed to keep, is the result of decisions made by White Supremacists.This is the functional meaning of White Supremacy (Racism)that many people — particularly non-white people —prefernot to acknowledge.Wilson asks Black people,‘Who has control of your food? Who has control of your electricity? Who has control of your water? Of your jobs? Who tells you what to wear when you go to work? Who tells you when to come to work...when to leave...when to go to lunch...how to speak...how to write...how to do this...how to do that...and how are these things taught, and how they are conditioned?"-- It is by reward and punishment. " You do this you get paid; you don't do this you don't get paid; you get a raise, you get docked. What do we have here?’To live under the power of another people is to be created by that people. To be rewarded or punished by that people is to be created by that people. We are living under them as the result of the exercise of the power of another people over us. Therefore, if we wish to change this situation (i.e., the conditions under which we live),then we must change the power relationships. If we are to prevent ourselves from being created by another people and are to engage in the act of self creation, then we must change the power relations.’ [MORE]No one is chained up in the free range prison.The “group dynamic” is based on consensual master/servant relations between white and black people. Whether racists are rich, poor, Democrat or Republican and whether they are violent psychopaths or persons engaging in gethanasiatic or genocidalconduct- - they all seek master-servant relations with non-white people. Such relations are the gravamen of the current operating system of racism white supremacy. Non-whites, regardless of education or status who indulge racists in such relations and cooperate with their own oppression may be described as “niggers” within the meaning of FUNKTIONARY.Racists seek relations with niggers and such relationshelp tocooperativelymaintain this system. Wilson explains, “the oppressive configuration the White man has assumed in relationship to the Black man is in good part the result of the fact that we have permitted ourselves to remain in a complementary subordinate configuration conducive to his oppressive designs.”He states,'white people’s so-called power, is to a great extent based upon the nature of the relationship they have with Black people. We empower them by the nature of our own behavior and attitudes as a people. They cannot be what they are, unless we are, what we are. To a good extent, the European is our creation … yes. If we look at our behavior, we will see that to a good extent, it is our behavior, our values, our consciousness, the kind of personalities we’ve established in ourselves, our taste, our desires and needs; that maintains the European in their dominant position’. This master servant relationship is something Black people can control and it must be destroyed - but not through Moral suasion. Similarly, when non-whites attempt to convince racists of the value of “black life” they engage in activity compatible and complementary to their own oppression and self-deception.The only purpose of race is to practice racism. Having little biological validity, the term "race" is better translated to mean organization. The sole purpose of which is to maintainwhite domination and control of non-whites.As such race is a granfalloon. [MORE]Getting caught up insuchunrealityof proving your humanity or that ‘you are not other’is a trick bag, a form of mental bondage.If you believe Black lives matter is a proposal and not something to assert as fact then you are a slave."Dr. Blynd states, "never fight (oppose) things that are not or 'what is not' - as you will stratify your energy and disparate your life force while paradoxically strengthening what is not. If it is an absence -a granfalloon- then don't fight with it, seek the thing of which it is the absence (for), find it and handle your business accordingly.[MORE]. Osho Rajineesh explained, "fighting with anything non-existent is the most dangerous thing in the world. It is like fighting with darkness; if you start fighting with darkness, wrestling, even if you are a Mohammed Ali you are not going to win. Soon you will be tired, exhausted, and you will fall flat on the ground, thinking that darkness seems to be very powerful.Darkness is not powerful, darkness is not weak, because darkness does not exist at all. All that you need is just a small candle and the darkness will be gone.’Black people have wasted a lot of time and energy appealing to racists, and analyzing them in order to somehow transform them. Such efforts appear to be John Lewis’ and many others life work. If Lewis died for something let it be that he died so we don’t have to continue to engage in a pathological struggle against darkness.’There is no need to try to transform racists - people can only change themselves - work on yourself and then help other non-white people. The destruction of the master/servant relationship does not mean destroying white folks or not having relations with them. It means no longer engaging in master/servant relations withthem.Your relations with white peopleshouldbe either at arms-length or non-existent. When a critical mass of individual,endependent,self-respecting Black people do so, the voluntary nature of RSWwillcease to exist, forcing change.Wilson explains,We talk about the Civil Rights Movement, and the Apartheid system of the South, when Blacks decided to just get out of the buses and just walk, the system changed. Yes, when they stopped sitting behind the white driver, just changing that relationship, changed the nature of power, in that system. When they decided then to walk side by side, when they decided to walk abreast and line themselves up, because they had not walked that way before … for the ends to be fought, the relationship changed. When they kept their monies in their pockets, when they sat on the stools and blocked the other people from them, and change the nature of the interactions between themselves and Europeans, the nature of the system changed. So therefore we have tremendous Power. It depends upon how we align ourselves as a people, and how we decide to relate to other people in the world, because they cannot have what they have, unless we are who we are. And that is why we don’t have to waste a great deal of time always appealing to them, and analyzing them, because we can better appeal to our own sense of self, and our own consciousness, and we waste a lot of time trying to transform them, when through transforming ourselves, they will be transformed automatically.’To end racism/white supremacy we must end or neutralize white power.' [MORE]‘Black people's uncritical acceptance of the rules, moral beliefs, perspectives, and their customary traditional participation in the American (White) political-economic process and system is tantamount to the legitimization of their own oppression and to the consensual ensurance of their own powerlessness.’ [MORE]Old frameworks must be re-invented or dropped altogether. ManyBlacks 'continue to live in a dream world where they believe thatemotionalsinging, marching, dancing, chanting, praying, barbecuing, releasing balloons into the air andhopingwill solve their problems.'[MORE]Neely Fuller calls such activity “the Teddy Bear Code” or"protest" actually incooperation with and submission towhitesupremacy/racismand government authority.Anonasks, 'If marching, picketing, and protesting was an effective strategy to achieve justice — why are we still marching, picketing, and protesting FOUR DECADES later? Why is there MORE police brutality, MORE black men and women in prison, MORE black children at risk, MORE family instability, MORE single mothers, and MORE black children dropping out of high school now than before the civil rights era?' [MORE] The operating system of White supremacy is refining itself while Blacks remain in a reactionary state.For the most part, ad-hoc liberal progressive theory and politics have failed. Black and otherfriendly whiteelected officials at the highest levels and appointments to various government positions along with individual accomplishments in corporations have not translated into power for Black people.Reformersshould witness that Minnesota, Atlanta, St. Louis,Cleveland, Baltimore or NYC or many other places where white cops murder Blacksin broad daylightwereall already dominated by liberal Democrats duly elected by the black votary.Said “black voting power” did not produce justice and does not prevent injustice from occurring to Black people.Additionally, laws enacted and funded by white legislators, administered by white Government workers, enforced by white prosecutors or cops and remedied by white jurors and judges [ their Black Brown rolebots]- the same racist suspects who participate, perpetuate and/or benefit from this system of white domination and control – hasnot produced justice.With a real understanding of the system of racism white supremacy, the actual context that we live in, non-white people must critically re-examine concepts and assumptions about democracy, government, authority, rights, majority rule, duty, dogma, monetary systems and the purpose of education to determine whether they are complementary to our liberation or our enslavement.FUNKTIONARY explains as follows:BOHICANS - Bend Over Here It Comes Again Negro. SNiggers are the last of the buck dancing Bohicans. “I am the last of the Bohicans” he said “. . .and I will never be broken. I am the last and worst of my breed - and the final token.” (See: SNigger, Coin-Operated, Samboism, Uncle Tome, Possumist, Turdistan, Piece-Activist, Niggeroe and GOP).SNAG = $nitch-ass Negroes Aiding Governments. 2) COINTEL-BROs. 3)SmileNegroAndGrin—while I put it in. SNAGs are coin-operated piece-activist sniggering infiltraitors from the native Black American community. SNAGs are on the stroll, exacting Black life as the toll, while klandestinely on the rogue "government" payroll. Dumb-ditty dumb where the hell do these sorry-ass sellout Negroes come from? When you see them, go and give them some—or at least a piece of your mind. It's easy to heckle and hyde, but why do we seem to always let self-hating sucker-perpetrating Negroes electric slide? SNAGs are Negroes who run from the fabric, the very essence of their Afrikan heritage struggle, culture and consciousness, and run to support the psychopathological dominant minority elite European global racist-supremacist mindset and Agenda along with its narcissistic projections and population control objectives (genocide and eugenics). [MORE]Neuropeans- (Neurotic Europeans) - neurotic, ignorant, narcissistic and self-deluded white supremacist Caucasians operating at the mythic and rational levels of consciousness only. 2) Fascists. (See Weitko Disease, White Supremacy and Yurungu.)Neuropeons- neurotic, stupid and self deluded poor white trash. 2) skin heads 3) Nazis, neo-Nazis and Theo-nazis (See KKK, WOTAN, Weitko Disease, Fasxism, Racism White Supremacy, Stupidity, Ku Klux Klan Yurungu).Black Conservative - a lost sheep in master's clothing. A black conservative typically has nothing of his own to conserve with the exception of his or her own double-consciousness. So-called "Black Conservatives" dodge the reality of their folly and posit is that what they truly are conserving is traditional "values" as if values ever had anything whatsoever to do with morality or ethics. A black conservative unknowingly preserves the differential power-relations and dynamics between those of African descent he and their bosses, the overruling overclass elite. [MORE]Sleeping Tom - a person of Afrikan descent who has not consciously awakened to fully embrace his or her own asili (cultural heritage and imperative). 2) a socially unconscious person of Afrikan descent who participates in secret balloting (voting). A sleepin' Tom lives and reacts out of another culture's asili or out of the mind of another; not their own. 3) a Negro who is unaware that he is all souled-out. 4) a Negro who isn't aware that he is in fact and in deed a certified Sambo. 5) a broken, token Negro; a coin-operative. (See: Straw Boss, Doublemindedness, Sambo, Uncle Tom-Tom, Coin-Operated Secret Ballots)Sambo- a self-loathing Negro lacking self-knowledge. "A willing slave gets upset if you refuse to acknowledge his or her master. [MORE]ABOVE BLACK CONSERVATIVE amateur PROBOT KENTUCKY AG DANIEL CAMERON ON DISPLAY LIKE A POTTED PLANT AT THE GOP CONVENTION. THIS CHILDISH-LIKE UNQUALIFIED SIMPLETON WAS APPOINTED TO OVERSEE THE PROSECUTION OF BREONNA TAYLOR ON MAY 13TH. THUS FAR HE HAS DONE NOTHING BUT STALL THE PROSECUTION OF WHITE COPS FOR HIS MASTERS. MLK WARNED THAT RACISTS OFTEN SUPPORT, APPOINT OR PROMOTE UNQUALIFIED NEGROS INTO HIGH POSITIONS SO THAT IMPORTANT MATTERS TO BLACK LIFE WILL BE HANDLED FRIVOLOUSLY. [MORE] PRIOR TO CAMERON’S ELECTION AS AG IN 2019 HE NEVER TRIED A CASE OF ANY KIND, NEVER REPRESENTED AN ACTUAL CLIENT IN A COURT CASE AND HAD NO COURTROOM EXPERIENCE. HE ALSO NEVER ARGUED A LEGAL BRIEF BEFORE EITHER THE APPELLATE COURT OR THE SUPREME COURT — AT THE STATE LEVEL OR FEDERAL LEVEL. CAMERON’S ONLY EXPERIENCE WAS WORKING AS GENERAL COUNSEL FOR MITCH MCCONNELL FOR 2 YEARS, WORKING AS A LAW CLERK AND WORKING FOR A LAW FIRM THAT FOCUSED ON LOBBYING - POSITIONS THAT HAVE NO MEANINGFUL RELEVANCE TO PROSECUTORIAL TRIAL AND APPELLATE WORK. [MORE]In Dr. Frances Cress Welsing’s color confrontation theory she defines racism white supremacy and explains that racists suffer from numerical inadequacy and color deficiency. She explains that both conditions are the primary motivational operating forces behind the system of racism white supremacy. Welsing observed that [numerical inadequacy]whites are vastly outnumbered, 90% of the world is non-white and the white population is rapidly declining. She states, ‘Indeed, if racists had not created such a global system in which they established power over the world's non-white majority, the white collective would have been genetically extinct a long time ago.’ Welsing further explains [color deficiency] ‘people of color always will have something highly visible that whites never can have or produce — the genetic factor of color. Always, in the presence of color, whites will feel genetically inferior.Whites aregenetic recessive(white genes or the "white race" cannot be reproduced whenmixed with non-white persons.“White can be genetically annihilated. White plus Black equals Colored. White plus Brown equals Colored. White plus Yellow equals Colored.”Welsing stated that non-white people must understand that the racist collective is playing a survival game with non-white people -engaging in behaviors in economics, education, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion, sex and more—in order for them to survive on the planet, by any means necessary. [MORE]Welsing states:“Neely Fuller, in his 1969 copyrightedThe United Independent Com­pensatory Code System Concept: a textbook/workbook for thought,speech and/or action for victims of racism (white supremacy),recognized the need for a functional statement on racism, one that could be utilized daily by those earnestly seeking to bring about social change. Fuller observed that, contrary to most present thinking, there is only one functioning racism in the known world — white supremacy. He challen­ges his readers to identify and then to demonstrate the superiority or functional supremacy of any of the world's "non-white" peoples over anyone. Concluding that since there is no operational supremacy of any "colored" people, Fuller reveals that the only valid operational definition of racism is white supremacy. He observes that in spite of any and all statements the world's "non-white" peoples may make about themselves having economic and/or political independence and the like, in the final analysis, they are all victims of the white supremacy process. He places major emphasis on the present realities of the world that can be verified and tested, rather than on what one could imagine to be the case (such as a black or yellow supremacy). He further emphasizes that, instead of focusing on individual cases or on specific locations, a perspective thatexamines the patterns of relationships between whites and "non-whites" worldwide must be developed.Fuller explains that racism is not merely a pattern of individual and/or institutional practice; it is a universally operating "system" of white supremacy and domination in which the majority of the world's white people participate. He discounts the validity of theories that recognize the evolution of economic systems as the origin of this state of affairs. Instead, he reveals the inadequate analysis of such theories by suggesting that various economic systems - such as capitalism, communism and socialism - have been devised, used and refined in the effort to achieve the primary goal of white domination. In other words, the goal of the white supremacy system is none other than the establishment, main­tenance, expansion and refinement of world domination by members of a group that classifies itself as the white "race." Fuller then suggests that the word "race," in this sense, has little biological validity but is translated more correctly as "organization," the sole purpose of which is to maintain white domination and world control. Fuller's emphasis on the concept of color amplifies the assertion made in 1903 by W.E.B. Du Bois (perhaps the greatest American social scientist) inThe Souls ofBldckFolk,that the great problem facing the 20th century is that of the color-line.Whether or not one is emotionally comfortable with Fuller's thesis and assessment is not germane. The question of such comfort never has been the important concern of scientific investigation. Of great significance in Fuller's work is the description of relationships between "non-white" and white peoples. Fuller defines and elucidates these relationships as a means of accounting for and illuminating many past and present observ­able social practices. Also, this examination reveals that, despite all kinds of programs and pronouncements to the contrary, for the past several hundred years, white supremacist social conditions have remained intact as the dominant social reality.Impressed that the concept of a "system" of white domination over the world's "non-white" peoples could explain the seeming predicament and dilemma of "non-white" social reality, I tended to focus, as a psychiatrist, on what possible motivational force, operative at both the individual andgroup levels, could account for the evolution of these patterns of social behavioral practice that apparently function in all areas of human activity (economics, education, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion, sex and war). While Fuller clearly suggests that this "system" consists of patterns of thought, speech and action, practiced to various degrees by the majority of the world's white people, the only comment on etiology he makes is that:"Most white people hate Black people. The reason that most whitepeople hate Black people is because whites are not Black people. Ifyou know this about white people, you need know little else. If youdo not know this about white people, virtually all else that you knowabout them will only confuse you."To take Fuller's account a step further, it should be noted that, in themajority of instances, any neurotic drive for superiority usually is foundedupon a deep and pervading sense of inadequacy and inferiority. Is it nottrue that white people represent in numerical terms a very small minorityof the world's people? And more profoundly, is not "white" itself the veryabsence of any ability to produce color? I reason, then, that the quality ofwhiteness is indeed a genetic inadequacy or a relative genetic deficiencystate, based upon the genetic inability to produce the skin pigments ofmelanin (which is responsible for all skin color). The vast majority of theworld's people are not so afflicted, which suggests that color is normalfor human beings and color absence is abnormal. Additionally, this stateof color absence acts always as a genetic recessive to the dominant geneticfactor of color-production. Color always "annihilates" (phenotypically-and genetically speaking) the non-color, white. Black people possess thegreatest color potential, with brown, red and yellow peoples possessinglesser quantities, respectively. This is the genetic and psychological basisforThe Cress Theory of Color-Confrontation and Racism (WhiteSupremacy).The Color-Confrontation theory states that the white or color-deficient Europeans responded psychologically, with a profound sense of numerical inadequacy and color inferiority, in their confrontations with themajority of the world's people - all of whom possessed varying degreesof color-producing capacity. This psychological response, whether con­scious or unconscious, revealed an inadequacy based on the most obviousand fundamental part of their being, their external appearance. As might be anticipated in terms of modern psychological theories, whites defen­sively developed an uncontrollable sense of hostility and aggression. Thisattitude has continued to manifest itself throughout the history of massconfrontations between whites and people of color. That the initialhostility and aggression came only from whites is recorded in innumerablediaries, journals and books written by whites. Also, records indicate that only after long periods of great abuse have non-whites responded defen­sively with any form of counterattack. This perplexing psychologicalreaction of whites has been directed towards all peoples with the capacity to produce melanin. However, the most profound aggressions have been directed towards Black people, who have the greatest color potential and,therefore, are the most envied and feared in genetic color competition.The experience of numerical inadequacy and genetic color inferiorityled whites to implement a number of interesting, although devastating (tonon-white peoples), psychological defense mechanisms. The initial psychological defense maneuver was therepressionof the initial painfulawareness of inadequacy. This primary ego defense was reinforced by ahost of other defense mechanisms.One of the most important of these defense mechanisms wasreactionformation,a response that converts (at the psychological level) something desired and envied but wholly unattainable, into something discredited and despised. The whites, desiring to have skin color but unable to attain it, claimed (consciously or unconsciously) that skin color was disgusting to them, and began attributing negative qualities to color - especially to blackness. Interestingly, the term "non-white" is a double negative result­ing in a positive statement. This is perhaps a Freudian slip, wherein the use of language ultimately reveals the primary psychological dynamic. Whites' desire to have colored skin can be observed at the very first signs of spring or summer when they begin to strip off their clothes (as many piecesas the law will allow), often permitting their skins to be burned severelyin an attempt to add some color to their pale bodies and renderingthemselves vulnerable to skin cancer in the process. Most cosmetics are also an attempt to add color to white skin. Such coloring makeup is provided for the white male as well as female. And finally, untold millions are spent annually on chemicals that are advertised as being able to increase the tanning potential of whites.The fact that some Blacks have attempted to change the color of their skin to white does not mitigate the force of this argument, as it can be demonstrated readily that these non-whites are responding to the already established social conditions of white supremacy. Such a process, as seen in Blacks and other non-whites, may be described as identification with the oppressor.Another example of the reaction formation defense is the elaboration of the myth of white genetic superiority, which continues to be reinforced assiduously (note Jensen's latest elaborations and their acceptance at all levels of the white social structure). Acutely aware of their inferior genetic ability to produce skin color, whites built the elaborate myth of white genetic superiority. Furthermore, whites set about the huge task of evolving a social, political and economic structure that would support the myth of the inferiority of Blacks and other non-whites.An additional psychological defense maneuver utilized by whites has been that ofprojection.Feeling extreme hostility and hate towards non-whites, whites began the pattern of stating that non-whites hated them. In many instances, this mechanism has served to mitigate the guilt whites occasionally experience for their impulse to aggress against Blacks and other people of color.” [MORE] According to FUNKTIONARYRichcraft – the sorcery of greed—the use of violence, laws, deception, theft, secret oaths, and oppression to snatch and hoard resources from and gain power over the vast majority of people’s lives through the widespread use of this vicious concoction of nefarious, lethal, legal, and demonstrably devious power. (See: COP, Gangbanking, Privilege, Aristocracy, Corporations, Usury, Power, Oppression, Violence, Greed, Deception, GIMME!, Political Money, Cultural Induction, GEO-Dollars, Control, The Pathocracy Poor) Socialist distancing – the ever-expanding and increasing disparity between the haves and the have-nots until the Socialist (i.e., monopoly capitalist) Welfare State becomes the Farewell State—farewell to your rights, your family, friends and even your life through Plandemics (Coronavirus), $camdemics (Corporate State turned Surveillance and Nanny State), 5G bio-weaponized eugenics, starvation, vaccinations, civil unrest, genocide and other nefarious LWO (Last World Order) activities that will greatly reduce the world’s population by 2030. Before Social Distancing, we were experiencing the effects of “Socialist Distancing”...the ever-widening separation between the “haves” (holders) and the “have-nots” (held-back) due to “monopoly capitalism” (centralization of credit in the hands of the State) which by wide academic recognition is the core attribute of communism / socialism, in fact, it is the 5th plank of the Communist Manifesto. The litmus test to any political system is what is used as “money” and who controls (monopolizes) its “issuance.” Labels just don’t cut it. Think deeper...learn to access the underlying reality behind the truth veneer you’ve been conditioned to hold or have been told. (See: Plandemic, $camdemics, Vaccines, Coronavirus, “Monopoly Capitalism,” Exchange, Economics, Matrix Capitalism, Political Money, GEO-Dollars, The Farewell State, Trapitalism, Cultural Induction COVERT-19) predictive programming – an ancient technique of downloading (marketing) an idea into the subconscious of the conditioned mass-mind (step-by-step) guiding (bringing) the duped victims into a desired or predetermined conclusion that they actually believe was consciously derived on their own. Predictive programming works down through the centuries like a charm. Everyone is standardized with the same indoctrination—conditioned under the same mis-education and disinformation. Since we all watch the same TV and download the same standardized education, it never occurs that we are getting conned, uploaded, downgraded, brain-chipped and ultimately faded from any memory of being an individual self. “Most folk’s beliefs and what they think is induced beliefs, it’s propagated into them through repetition as Bertrand Russell said. Just repetitive advertising and people start parroting it in their daily lives and it’s actually changing the structure of their mind into acceptance of something they don’t even perceive yet.” ~ Alan Watt. (See: Borg, Pathocracy, MEDIA, T.V., Money, Schooling, Education, Indoctrination, Cultural Conditioning, Dollar, “Government,” Zombie, Android, Belief, Inoculation, Chemtrails Democracy) According to FUNKTIONARYHuman Resources - answer questions when asked; sign their names when told; open doors when knocked upon; entrust themselves to the protection of others as a ward; trust in anything other than their inner authority; believe what they are told; know the definitions of words and meaning of terms without bothering to reference the source of the definitions; evade instead of confront apparent external authority or putative jurisdiction, alleged liability or presentment; covet the property of merchants; volunteer to servitude; desire a kinder froster instead of liberty; and, yearn for the illusion of security at the expense of inalienable fights and freedom. Are you a human resource of the Corporate U.S. "government"? Are you a fictional citizen of the United States--as granted by Congress? Do you have a Birth Certificate with a date of birth? Have you registered to vote? Have you applied for the "benefits" of Social Security? (See: Statutory Oppression, Involuntary Servitude, Citizen of the United States, Legislation, Date of Biah, Statutes, Freedom, Liberty, Inalienable Rights, Empty Words, Blanks, Employee, Tin Woodsman, Scarecrow, OWLs, Hireling, Voting, SSN, Socialism, IRS Birth Certificate) citizens- those who instinctively seek permission or ask themselves whether or not they are allowed to do anything before they act. Citizens (serfs, subjects or slaves), possess a "ruled" mind-virus mentality (See: Citizenship Slavery).“Today, law makes people equal—that is, equal wards of the state (the plantation called Congress); the Corporate Police State. A citizen is one who lives a life of involuntary servitude under the command of another. A citizen is one whose second nature is to do whatever might please his or her master without question in order to avoid disapproval and/or punishment. Citizens show-up, shut-up, and pay-up—extorted tribute and fines.” [MORE]obedience - a Self-Other irreversible relationship in which there is only communication (mind-to-mind), i.e. no contact, and an imbalance of power. 2) the highest form of the power-fear systemic. 3) slavery sold to both children and adults alike deceptively packaged in a respectfully sounding label. 4) reverse terrorism. You can compel obedience but you cannot compel responsibility or respect. Everyone should have a say in waking-up to (or waking up from) whatever they have been programmed to obey. It is difficult to reduce to obedience anyone who has no wish to command. If you can't read very well and follow it up with the absence of critical thinking skills, then obey your masters and oppressors until you can—for your own survival. Life is more trouble-free when you obey. If you speak TV-English, by all means obey the beast, if you like freedom of movement with your slavery. TV's ought to have warning labels: "Use of this device can be hazardous to your freedom.'" How can you take a man seriously who watches T.V. obediently, drinks habitually and desires freedom too? The historian Howard Zinn is clear on the role obedience has played on our conditions throughout the centuries. "[Civil disobedience] is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem is that numbers of people all over the world have obeyed the dictates of the leaders of their government and have gone to war, and millions of people have been killed because of this obedience. ...Our problem is that people are obedient all over the world in the face of poverty and starvation and stupidity, and war and cruelty. Our problem is people are obedient while the jails are full with petty thieves, and all the while the grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem." More atrocities are committed in the name of economics than in the name of hate, ideological or religious intolerance. (See: Authority, God, Atrocities, Conditioning. TV, War, The COMB, Control, Power, Violence. Religion, Should.Duty, Hatred, Other, Inhumanity, Communication, Programming, Indoctrination, Poverty, Gangbanking, Education, Unlearning.Force. Orderlies, Police, Force Continuum. Judicial Tyranny, Residency, Labor, Property, Servitude, Critical Thinking,Holodeck Court, Questioning, Pulpit. TUFF. Authenticity. Fear Authoritarians). From [HERE] The officers’ smell of raw marijuana at a house was probable cause. This is different than the case of burnt marijuana not justifying a search of the trunk of a car. In an IAC claim, defendant didn’t plead any evidence to show defense counsel should have requested a Franks hearing.State v. Dockum, 2020-Ohio-4163, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 3064 (6th Dist. Aug. 21, 2020).The court explained the facts of the case as follows:On January 21, 2018, city of Rossford patrol officers Brandon Lewis and Austin McDermott planned to meet for dinner around 7:00 p.m. at a diner on Superior Street, in Rossford, Ohio. Officer McDermott parked in front of an apartment building at 153 Superior, and as he exited his vehicle, he smelled raw marijuana. After Officer Lewis arrived, he joined McDermott and indicated that he, too, smelled raw marijuana. The officers initially suspected the odor was emanating from an open window in the apartment building. After the two walked up and down the street, investigating the source of the odor, and after speaking with an apparent tenant from the apartment building, they ultimately determined the smell was emanating from a nearby storefront at 155 Superior. The apartment resident informed Lewis and McDermott that he had noted a marijuana odor at 155 Superior over the past two to three weeks and suggested someone should investigate the matter. {¶ 3} The officers checked out the building at 155 Superior. The storefront had a bolt on the front door, boards over the windows, and no signs, lights, or activity to suggest an active business. Fencing between 155 Superior and adjoining buildings prevented officers from viewing the rear of the building, so the officers walked around the apartment building at 153 Superior to access the alley that ran behind the two properties. {¶ 4} As Lewis and McDermott walked along the alley and neared the rear of 155 Superior, the odor of raw marijuana intensified. The two repeatedly stepped away from 155 Superior and walked back to confirm the source of the odor as 155 Superior. They then entered the property through a closed gate, and noted a garage, fencing, and overgrown vegetation. The property also had a shed, but vegetation covered the structure, with vines blocking the doors. The officers also saw a truck on the property, and a grill and lawn chair in the backyard area. There were two rear doors on the building, as well as a sign indicating the address as 155 1⁄2. A security light, mounted on the building, illuminated the back of the structure. {¶ 5} Officer Lewis discovered one of the doors on the back of the building was unlocked. Due to the condition of the structure, with rotting, swollen wood framing the door, Lewis could not easily open this door. There was also a bookshelf pushed up against the inside of the door, preventing the door from swinging open. Lewis was able to nudge the door open a few inches, and through that gap, he and McDermott viewed a washer and dryer, clothes, and other items suggesting someone lived in the structure. They also spotted tomato cages, often used in grow operations, and the odor of raw marijuana became much stronger. Lewis closed the door, and he and Officer McDermott exited the property to notify their shift supervisor and consult with a detective. {¶ 6} As they stood in the alley, phoning the shift supervisor, Kayla Wallace pulled her vehicle into the alley and spoke with the officers. They informed her of the odor of raw marijuana and requested consent to search the home. Wallace declined, indicating she had to go to work. The officers subsequently observed her driving past the property several times, parking down the block, and running back and entering the property. The Officers later determined that Kayla Wallace and appellant resided at 155 1⁄2 Superior. {¶ 7} Officer McDermott prepared an affidavit for a search warrant of the property, identifying the occupant as Kayla Wallace. He attested to the strong odor of raw marijuana emanating from the front and back of the structure at 155 Superior, and contact with a resident from the building next door, who informed officers that the odor of marijuana had been present for the past two or three weeks. The affidavit also contained facts gleaned from entering the rear of the property and pushing open a back door. {¶ 8} The officers obtained the requested search warrant. Around 11:00 p.m., police searched the premises, and seized evidence of a grow operation from inside 155 1⁄2 Superior, including blowers, grow lights, hydroponic containers, chemicals, thermostats, containers holding unknown substances, marijuana plants and loose marijuana, and tomato cages. Based on the evidence seized, police filed charges against appellant and Kayla Wallace. {¶ 9} On August 2, 2018, appellant was charged with Count 1: illegal cultivation of marijuana in violation of R.C. 2925.04(A) and (C)(5)(c), Count 2: illegal assembly or possession of chemicals for the manufacture of drugs in violation of R.C. 2925.041(A) and (C), Count 3: possession of marijuana in violation of R.C. 2925.11(A) and (C)(3)(c), and Count 4: possession of hashish in violation of R.C. 2925.11(A) and (C)(7)(d). {¶ 10} Appellant entered a not guilty plea to the charges. Appellant and Kayla Wallace filed a joint motion to suppress evidence of the search, arguing the information gathered for the affidavit in support of the search warrant resulted from an unconstitutional search of the premises. They further argued the affidavit provided insufficient facts to establish probable cause. After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court determined the search of the curtilage and entry into the home was unconstitutional, but the affidavit contained sufficient facts—not the product of an unconstitutional search—to establish probable cause to search the premises. {¶ 11} On June 10, 2019, appellant withdrew his not guilty plea, and entered a plea of no contest to the indictment. The trial court accepted the plea, found appellant guilty, and referred the matter for a presentence investigation report. After hearing, the trial court sentenced appellant to 2 years of community control as to each count, with a reserved prison term of 12 months as to Count 1, 36 months as to Count 2, 12 months as to Count 3, and 36 months as to Count 4. III. Assignments of Error {¶ 12} Appellant now appeals the trial court’s denial of the motion to suppress, asserting the following assignments of error: 1. The Trial Court erred in denying Appellant’s Motion to Suppress because mere smell of raw marijuana does not provide sufficient probable cause to support the issuance of a search warrant. 2. There was not sufficient probable cause for the issuance of a search warrant, thus all evidence obtained as a result of the execution of the search warrant must be suppressed. 3. Appellant’s trial attorney’s failure to request a hearing pursuant to Franks v. Delaware [438 U.S.154, 98 S.Ct.2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978)] as a result of the false statements and material omissions in the search warrant affidavit was ineffective assistance of counsel. The legal analysis of the case continues [HERE] From [HERE]When Annie Hurst stepped outside her house on Sunday night, she saw something that made her scream.Across the street, a police officer was aiming his gun at Jacob Blake, her neighbor, as he tried to get into his car with three of his children in the back seat. The officer grabbed him by his shirt and fired several times, shooting him in the back.Within hours, graphic video of the shooting was racing across social media, and Kenosha erupted into protest, looting and fires downtown.The police offered little detail about what had happened in the shooting, saying only that an officer had shot Mr. Blake while responding to a domestic incident. Local and state officials declined on Monday to provide detailed information about the officers who responded.Mr. Blake, 29, was in stable condition at a nearby hospital on Monday.The investigation was immediately turned over by the Kenosha Police Department to the Wisconsin Department of Justice, and the three officers who were at the scene were placed on administrative leave.“What I saw in that video is disturbing,” said Anthony Kennedy, a Kenosha alderman who represents Mr. Blake’s district. “It is heartbreaking. And I don’t have an answer for what happened.”While body cameras have become standard in many police departments around the country, they have been a matter of debate in Kenosha. Police officers in the city do not wear body cameras now, though the city plans to start using them in 2022, city officials said. Police cars are generally equipped with dashboard cameras.Neighbors described an ordinary Sunday afternoon that suddenly and swiftly turned violent.Shortly before the shooting, Mr. Blake, who worked as a security guard, stopped next door at the apartment of a friend, Donnell Lauderdale. Mr. Blake was carrying gifts for Mr. Lauderdale’s 8-year-old son.“He had a bag full of presents,” Mr. Lauderdale said, standing outside his home. “He’s a family man. He takes good care of his kids.” Three of Mr. Blake’s six children — aged 8, 5 and 3 — are believed to have been in the back seat of the car when the shooting took place.Benjamin Crump, a lawyer for the family, said in an interview that he had been told that Mr. Blake was attempting to intervene in an argument between two women when the police arrived.In a video taken from an apartment window across the street, several officers can be seen standing on a sidewalk next to a four-door S.U.V. The man identified as Mr. Blake, wearing a white tank top and black shorts, is seen walking along the passenger side of the vehicle, away from the officers, who are yelling. At least one of them points a gun at him.Mr. Blake walks around the front of the vehicle and opens the driver’s side door. Several people can be heard yelling, and one officer is seen grabbing Mr. Blake’s shirt. As Mr. Blake opens the vehicle door, at least half a dozen shots are heard, while at least two officers can be seen with their guns pointed at him. The video, which is about 20 seconds long, ends shortly after the shooting.“The police haven’t told us why they did what they did to him,” said Mr. Crump, a civil rights lawyer who has also represented the family of George Floyd. “Being a Black man in America, he was suspicious automatically.”In Kenosha, which is about 11 percent Black, 17 percent Hispanic and 67 percent white, many residents told of longstanding tensions between Black residents and the police. The mayor, the police chief and the district attorney are white.The Wisconsin attorney general, Josh Kaul, vowed to “vigorously and fully investigate the facts of this case,” but said he was not ready to comment on the details, including information about the officers on the scene.“Our pursuit of justice is going to be unwavering,” he said Monday at an afternoon news conference.Though Mr. Kaul, a Democrat, is leading an independent investigation, he said the decision to prosecute the case would be made by the local prosecutor. The Kenosha County district attorney, Michael D. Graveley, said his office would decide whether to press charges based on the evidence gathered by the outside investigators.The shooting quickly set off a partisan showdown in a state where divided government — a Democratic governor and a Republican-held Legislature — has led to repeated clashes over policy.Governor Evers announced that he was calling state legislators to a special session next week to consider measures on police accountability and transparency. The measures were first put forth by Mr. Evers’s administration in June after the killings of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor, but were not taken up by the Legislature.“This movement has touched every corner of Wisconsin, and frankly, I should not need to call a special session when people across our state — from the streets of my small hometown of Plymouth to the streets of Milwaukee — are demanding their elected leaders take action,” Mr. Evers said.But Republican leaders accused the governor of playing partisan politics by quickly calling for a special session, and the fate of that session seemed uncertain.“The governor is choosing to turn to politics again by dictating liberal policies that will only deepen the divisions in our state,” said State Representative Robin Vos, the Republican speaker of the State Assembly. Mr. Vos on Monday called for a task force focused on racial disparities and police practices.The governor’s proposal calls for measures including establishment of statewide standards for the use of force by law enforcement agencies, requirements for police departments to ban the use of chokeholds, and elimination of the use of “no knock” warrants, a type of warrant that allows officers to enter people’s homes without notice.From [HERE] The city has agreed to pay a family more than $6 million in a wrongful death lawsuit stemming from the choking death of a Latino man in February. [MORE]Las Cruces reached the agreement July 17 and promised to make the payment within 30 days to the family of Antonio Valenzuela, who died at the hands of a police officer, the Las Cruces Sun-News reported Wednesday.Albuquerque attorney Sam Bregman said the monetary compensation his clients received was substantial, adding that it would be “cost-prohibitive” for the department to be involved in future wrongful death lawsuits.The Las Cruces Police Department also agreed to ban all forms of neck restraints and chokeholds, host biannual training on de-escalation policies and provide racial bias training. Police also must adopt a warning system involving officers who use excessive force and require officers to undergo yearly mental health exams.“The family knows nothing will bring Antonio back, but they appreciate the city making an effort to change its policies to provide better policing,” Bregman said.The settlement also says that the family had claims against former police officer Christopher Smelser and others in the department but that the city payment waives each of those claims.Valenzuela, 40, had a warrant out for his arrest because of a parole violation and fought with officers who tried to detain him after he fled from a traffic stop on Feb. 29, authorities said. Smelser, who is Hispanic, then placed him in a vascular neck restraint.An autopsy report released the first week of June ruled Valenzuela’s death a homicide. His Adam’s apple was crushed, he had swelling in the brain, fractured ribs and damaged blood vessels in his eyes consistent with strangulation.Smelser was later fired and faces a second-degree murder charge. Smelser’s attorney, Amy L. Orlando, previously said that Smelser had been trained to use the hold and that the murder charge was a political move meant to grab headlines amid a national outcry over racial injustice and police brutality.UNDER ARREST FOR WHITE SUPREMACY. From [HERE] Police release an edited, narrated and remixedvideoThursday of a shooting that left a Black man dead in California last week,prompting protestsand community outrage.Anthony McClain, a 32-year-old father of three, was shot by a white officer during a traffic stop on Aug. 15, the Pasadena Police Departmentsaid.Around 7:52 p.m., officers stopped a four-door, dark-colored Infiniti without a front license plate.The officers determined there were two men in the car — McClain being the passenger.When police asked the driver for his license, the driver said his license was suspended. The driver cooperated with police after being asked to get out of the car, the department said.McClain, who was also asked to get out of the car, is seen on video getting out, then running away from the officers.Police say he reached for an item in his waistband, which they believed to be a firearm.“The natural swinging movement of the individual’s arms while running revealed what both officers immediately recognized as a firearm in his left hand,” according to the department.With two officers chasing him, McClain can be seen turning and looking at the officers over his right shoulder. Police say they feared he was turning back to shoot at them, so the officer closest to McClain shot at him twice.It wasn’t immediately clear that he had been shot, as he continued to run “for a considerable distance,” police said. He eventually fell.McClain sustained at least one gunshot wound, and was given immediate medical attention, according to the department. Paramedics arrived and transported him to a hospital, where he died.A loaded firearm that was not registered and was illegally assembled was recovered at the scene.A witness told police they saw McClain throw a firearm. The witness did not talk to the media. No gun appears to be visible on the video. But Caree Harper, the McClain family’s attorney, said what police saw in the video was a large metal belt buckle, the Los Angeles Timesreported.Neither McClain nor the second officer fired a weapon.Remixed videos are [HERE]There appears to be no lawful basis for the cops to detain the Black man because he was the passenger in the vehicle. While a passenger may be ordered out of a vehicle for officer safety the Supreme Court has explained that unless the officer has a reasonable articulable suspicion, he may not further detain a passenger.Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408 (1997). Cops have not articulated any reason they wanted to detain McLain. The driver may have been under arrest for driving without a permit but that did not provide the police any justification for detaining or arresting McClain.At the time of the incident, McClain was being supervised by the Los Angeles County Probation Department under the Post-Release community supervision program and had previously been convicted of a felony.A rally was held Thursday, calling for the officer who shot McClain to be fired and for the unedited video footage to be released.“If you did something wrong, if you have an illegal firearm, let’s deal with that through the court system,” Pastor Kerwin Manning said at the rally. “But our Black men and woman are not even getting an opportunity to make it to court and we’re tired of it.”Next week, the Pasadena City Council will consider implementing a police oversight commission to investigate the shooting, according to the L.A. Times, but advocates for McClain are demanding an independent police audit. The Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office and the City of Pasadena are also expected to conduct an independent third party review of the incident, according to the department.“Any type of officer involved shooting is horrific for our community and we have to be held accountable as a police department,” Chief John Perez said. From [HERE] Two Kansas City police officers pleaded not guilty to felony assault charges Tuesday in a case that alleges the pair used excessive force during the arrest of Breona Hill, according to the Jackson County Prosecutor’s Office.Matthew G. Brummett and Charles Prichard each entered not guilty pleas during an arraignment hearing, said Michael Mansur, a spokesman for the Jackson County Prosecutor’s Office.A grand jury handed an indictment in May, initially charging Brummett and Prichard each with a misdemeanor charge of fourth-degree assault. However, after those charges were were filed, two new witnesses came forward. And based on the new testimony,a grand jury amended the chargeslast month. Both men now face a charge of felony third-degree assault for allegedly pinning Hill to the ground and slamming her head into the pavement outside a beauty store in May 2019 during an arrest.The new charges alleged that the officers“knowingly” caused injury to Hillduring the arrest “by slamming her face against the concrete sidewalk, kneeing her in the face, torso and ribs and forcing her arms over her head while cuffed.”The casegained national attentionafter the arrest was caught on video.After the man who recorded the arrest was cited by police for failing to obey officers’ orders,the City Council in June voted to pass legislation they hope would protect witnesses.The man,Roderick Reed, 52, was convicted in Municipal Courtand sentenced to 30 days in jail and a year of probation.Police maintained he was cited for failing to move his car from the middle of the street — not for recording the arrest. Recording police officers in public is legal.In June,Mayor Quinton Lucas said he would pardon Reed. law Professor Laurent Sacharoff explains “Vendors and police configure the access to body camera videos in a manner designed to build a case against a suspect, and to prosecute that suspect in court, rather than to keep police accountable. For example, in some instances police alone have direct access to the videos. This configuration runs entirely counter to accountability: the very party that the program aims to check currently has full control over its contents.”From [HERE] Attorneys representing the parents of Salaythis Melvin, a 22-year-old man fatally shot in the back by a white Orange County deputy in plain clothes, are demanding Sheriff John Mina make immediate policy changes to the department’s use of force policy.Lawyers Bradley Laurent and Carlus Haynes spoke to reporters Wednesday the morning after Mina won the primary election for a chance to serve a second term as sheriff andthe body camera video of Melvin’s shooting was released.The attorneys said they plan to file a civil lawsuit against the sheriff and the department for wrongful death.Orange County Sheriff’s Office Agent James Montiel opened fire on Salaythis Melvinon Aug. 7 outside the Florida Mallas the 22-year-old was running away, video shows.The sheriff said the incident began shortly after noon when deputies tried to approach a group of four individuals outside Dick’s Sporting Goods because one of the men had an active warrant for his arrest and was also a person of interest in a triple shooting that occurred on Powers Ridge Court in Pine Hills last month. That warrant was not for Melvin and deputies did not know who he was, even asking his name in the body camera video.When deputies approached, the 22-year-old ran away and toward Montiel, according to the deputy’s account, who got out of his unmarked vehicle and claimed that he saw Melvin holding a Glock handgun. Melvin died of a single gunshot wound to the back, according to the Sheriff’s Office. He was running away from the deputy when he was shot, the video shows.Six videos of the shooting were released from six different deputies who were on scene. However, none of the videos released were from Montiel, the agent who shot Melvin. Apparently, he was not wearing a body camera or it was not on at the time of the shooting or it was destroyed and or the police are lying. The attorneys said they have not been given any reason why Montiel’s body camera was not activated or on at the time.“We haven’t been given a reason why there isn’t any camera footage from the shooter’s perspective or vantage point,” Laurent said.The attorneys are asking Mina to change the policy that allows deputies involved in shooting to review body camera video before providing their statements. They’re also calling on any deputy involved in a shooting to be suspended without pay.The video released is too far away to show if Melvin has a weapon in his hands.[how convenient]. Other meaningless videos of yurugu cops are [HERE]The attorneys are demanding Mina make a policy change that bans shooting a fleeing suspect and makes officers “think twice” before pulling the trigger.“First, he’s got to make it a policy that anybody that’s fleeing, you cannot shoot them in the back,” Haynes said, adding “It’s not ... deer season. We’re not shooting people in the back, period.”The video shows deputies involved in the operation were driving unmarked vehicles and in plain clothes. Montiel was not wearing anything that would identify him as a law enforcement officer until after the shooting, the attorneys said the video shows.The videos do not show the full interaction and it’s hard to tell if Montiel had on anything identifying him as a Sheriff’s Office employee. In the video he is in a black t-shirt and tan shorts.“Sheriff Mina, is this a good policy to have unmarked vehicles and unmarked officers, serving arrest warrants?” Haynes asked.Both attorneys questioned the timing of when the body camera video was released.A spokesperson for the sheriff’s Office said they were notified Tuesday the FDLE completed its last initial interview. Laurent said the Sheriff’s Office told them around 3 p.m. they were releasing the video, however, they did not receive the video until about 6 p.m., about an hour before polls closed on Florida’s primary election night, two weeks after the shooting.“To release it at that time it seems pretty obvious it was a strategic decision,” Laurent said.The Sheriff’s Office denies the timing was intentional.“In regards to the speculation of the timing of such release related to Sheriff Mina’s election is completely inaccurate and speculative,” a spokesperson for the Sheriff’s Office said.News 6 asked the sheriff’s office to explain the process it took to release the videos and we’re waiting for a response.A spokesperson for the Florida Department of Law Enforcement said the video was released after the state agency finished initial interviews Tuesday around noon.“We completed the initial interviews (Tuesday). While our investigation is active, we are unable to provide additional information. Our role is to conduct a complete and thorough investigation as it relates to the law enforcement officer’s use of force,” FDLE said in an email. “Once our investigation is complete, we provide that information to the state attorney who makes the charging decisions. Our investigation is considered ‘active’ until the State Attorney’s Office renders their findings.”During an election news conference on Tuesday, Mina said the Sheriff’s Office is waiting for the FDLE investigation to be complete before making any decisions about the deputy involved.Laurent and Haynes said the deputy who shot Melvin should have been suspended without pay or fired until the investigation is complete.“I would have liked to hear him come out and say, ‘This was a bad shooting. This deputy has been fired,’ but yet he wants to tell everybody in Orlando that he’s doing the right thing and he’s being fully transparent,” Haynes said. “Well, we do know that there’s a lot of video and audio that we’re missing ... how transparent is that?”Melvin’s parents, Michelin McKee and Ryan Findley, released a statement the day after the video was released. While their attorneys have described what they saw, the parents said they have not been able to bring themselves to watch the video of their son’s last moments.They thanked the sheriff for releasing the video but asked that Melvin’s death not be in vain.“Promise us, and the citizens of Orange County that no one -- be they black or white, young or old, Baptist or Catholic -- be gunned down in the manner our son was,” McKee and Findley said in a statement.Both attorneys echoed that sentiment and said they will continue to seek more transparency from the sheriff and asked the community do the same.“If you want to bring any value to this man’s life after his death, do not let Sheriff Mina off the hook,” Haynes said.From [HERE] The family of Caine Rogers, a 22-year-old Black man shot andkilled by a white Atlanta Police officer in 2016, has released new video from the night of the fatal shooting and are renewing their calls for action from the city.Rogers' parents and their attorneys made the video public during a Tuesday morning news conference on Zoom - which they said they fought hard to obtain and share.Rogers was shot and killed by former Atlanta Police officer James Burns the night of June 22, 2016. Burns was responding as backup to a call of a suspicious person possibly breaking into cars at an apartment complex off Monroe Drive.When Burns arrived at the scene Rogers' vehicle was slowly pulling off. He flips on his lights and siren, but the car continues forward. Burns jumps out of his patrol car and orders the car to stop, but it keeps going.It is clear in the video that the Black man’s video posed no threat to the white officer. The officer’s car was pulled up and parked on the left side of the street (illegally) and the Rogers drove on the right side of the road - as any driver would. Burns then fires a fatal shot through the front passenger window, hitting Rogers in the head.Burns' dashcam video, which had been withheld from the public as part of the ongoing investigation, shows the aftermath.Burns' dashcam video, which had been withheld from the public as part of the ongoing investigation, shows the aftermath."Burns was indicted two months after the incident in 2016.He was reindicted in 2018 to fix a procedural matter," according to the Fulton County District Attorney's Office. Four year’s later the case though is still working its way through the court system with a trial date yet to be set - a real aggressive prosecution no doubt - surely as rigorous and vigorous as when a white cop is murdered by a Black man. During the Tuesday Zoom call, Rogers parents, who sued the City of Atlanta soon after the fatal shooting, said the delays have dragged on for too long and the inaction has grown to become "disrespectful.""Rogers parents, Melva Rogers and Deravis Thomas, are appreciative that Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance-Bottoms and the city of Atlanta have highlighted the death of Rayshard Brooks and the tasing of two HBCU students, but they wonder why the mayor or city has done nothing regarding their son's killing at the hands of APD officer James Burns," family attorneys with the Cochran Firm noted in a statement.They said that the city - neither under the leadership of Mayor Kasim Reed nor Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms - has not contacted them to formally apologize for what happened. They said the city has also failed to take responsibility for the actions of the former officer."The city has yet to acknowledge us in any capacity," Deravis added. "No one has ever reached out to us to even apologize to us on behalf of this officer that they hired."They're now asking to sit down with the mayor and have the lawsuit against the city - which is on hold because of the delays with the criminal case, and, now, COVID-19 - settled. They are also asking for the mayor to establish what they're calling a reconciliation commission to address past andunresolved cases of injustice involving APD officers.Meanwhile, they're hoping that the incoming Fulton County DA, Fani Willis, will continue the work current DA Paul Howard has done on the case and help push it forward to a resolution.11Alive contacted both Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms' office and Burns' attorney for comment.Bottoms released the following statement:"The fact that this incident occurred in 2016, before I was Mayor, yet remains unresolved four years later, only highlights the need for urgent action and reform. My thoughts and prayers are with the family of Caine Rogers and every other family awaiting justice.” lol. Black rolebot’s administration inherited this case and her administration continued to withhold the “public video” and slow roll a criminal prosecution of one of its own. Mayor is a joke - what is the difference between a Black strawboss/puppetician and racist puppetician? They are essential to the refinement of racism white supremacy and the system of physical coercion. From [HERE] Thevideostarts as Jacob Blake rounds the front of a silver SUV on Sunday, with two Kenosha, Wis., police officers following close behind, their guns drawn. When Blake opens the door and steps inside, the officers suddenly fire repeatedly toward his back — at least seven times.Blake is now in serious condition, the officers have been placed on leave, and the city of Kenosha declared an emergency curfew after destructive protests rocked the city into early Monday morning. It’s the latest case of police violence caught on camera in a summer overwhelmed by escalating rounds of protests following George Floyd’s death in Minneapolis.The shooting happened after 5 p.m., when officers responded to a domestic incident, police said. Witnesses told the Kenosha News that Blakewas trying to break up a fightand that police first attempted to taser him.The video shows neighbors congregated outside as two police officers with their guns drawn followed Blake as he approached the car. As Blake opened the driver’s side door, on officer can be seen tugging at Blake’s white tank top before multiple shots ring out from the police.Kenosha News reportedthat Blake was shot in front of his children. Ben Crump, a civil rights attorney, posted onTwitterthat Blake’s three sons were inside the car.Police have not commented on what led to the shooting. Blake was taken by helicopter to Froedtert Hospital in Milwaukee, police said. Early Monday morning,TMJ4 reportedthat Blake’s brother said he is out of surgery and in intensive care.The department spokesman, Lt. Joseph Nosalik, said in a statement that the shooting would be investigated by the Division of Criminal Investigation at the Wisconsin Department of Justice. The police announced on Twitter late Sunday night that they had put into effect a citywide curfew until 7 a.m.The NYT reported that A phone message left for Lieutenant Nosalik seeking further information about the shooting was not immediately returned. [MORE]The Wisconsin Department of Justice will investigate the shooting, police said.As footage of Blake’s shooting spread on social media, a crowd gathered at the intersection where he was shot. Tensions quickly rose as more police officers arrived wearing riot gear and several police cars were damaged. Avideoshows one police officer being hit with a brick and collapsing to the ground. From [HERE] and [MORE] Outrage is building, and Louisiana State Police are investigating, after a 31-year-old Black man was fatally shot by police in the city of Lafayette on Friday.According to video footage and eyewitness reports, Lafayette police officers firedat least 10 shotsat Trayford Pellerin as he walked away from them and towards an occupied convenience store. Legal organizations and community members are decrying the shooting as an excessive use of force, and demanding transparency and justice for Pellerin.The incident is the latest in a string of high-profile police killings of Black people, including Breonna Taylor and George Floyd, that sparked nationwide protests against racism and police violence earlier this summer.The Acadiana Advocatereports the incident is the third officer-involved shooting by the Lafayette Police Department in roughly five weeks.The Louisiana State Police said in astatementthat around 8 p.m. on Friday, Lafayette Police responded to a "disturbance involving a person armed with a knife at a convenience store."State Police said the officers encountered Pellerin in the parking lot and attempted to apprehend him there, but ended up pursuing him forroughly half a mileon foot as he left the scene. Officers deployed Tasers in pursuit "but they were ineffective," according to the statement.The statement said officers started shooting when Pellerin, reportedly still armed with a knife, attempted to enter a different convenience store along NW Evangeline Throughway. Following the flurry of gunfire, he was transported to an area hospital and later pronounced dead.The LPD requested that the Louisiana State Police Bureau of Investigations look into the shooting; the state police said that investigation is "active and ongoing."Interim Lafayette Police Chief Scott Morgan said the officers involved have been placed onadministrative leave with paywhile the investigation is underway.Rickasha Montgomery, a witness who captured a video of the shooting, told the LafayetteDaily Advertiserthat she saw Pellerin holding what appeared to be a knife, walking down Evangeline Thruway away from police as they Tased him. She said she saw about six officers with their guns drawn yell for Pellerin to get on the ground, and that they shot him when he reached the door of a Shell gas station."I feel kind of scared about it," Montgomery told the newspaper. "I'm traumatized. You're so used to hearing about this, but I never thought I would experience it."Graphicbystander videoof the shooting has since circulated on social media. (NPR has not independently verified video of the incident).Michelle Pellerin, the victim's mother, toldThe Acadiana Advocateon Saturday she was in disbelief."I'm still trying to understand what happened," she said. "Why did it have to go this far? Why him? Everybody talks about the video, but I haven't seen it and I don't want to see it. I can't."She described her oldest son as "kind, intelligent, quiet and shy." She said he loved to cook, was close with his extended family and worked odd jobs but was thinking about returning to school and possibly studying law.She said he suffered from anxiety related to social situations and being in groups of people, something he sought professional help for earlier this year. Pellerin told the newspaper she believes her son may have been particularly frightened by the group of officers coming at him.Civil rights attorney Ben Crump, one of the lawyers retained by the family, told the newspaper that the family believes Pellerin may have been experiencing a mental health crisis at the time of his death.Crump, who also represents the families of Floyd and Taylor, said in astatementthat he and co-counsel Ronald Haley "refuse to let this case resolve like so many others: quietly and without answers and justice."Haley toldThe Advocatethat even if a knife was present, eyewitness video shows there was no one in Pellerin's vicinity and if he was a danger to anyone, he was only a danger to himself. Crump said officers should have been able to find alternatives to lethal force. The attorneys say a civil lawsuit is planned."The family, and the people of Lafayette, deserve honesty and accountability from those who are sworn to protect them — the Lafayette Police," Crump wrote. "The officers involved should be fired immediately for their abhorrent and fatal actions."TheACLU of Louisianaand theSouthern Poverty Law Centeralso condemned the shooting. Both said accounts show police shooting Pellerin as he walked away from them, and called for investigations into what they called the officers' "excessive use of force."They also noted that the shooting comes amidst an ongoing reckoning over "the epidemic of police violence," particularly against Black people, with demonstrators across the country already calling for police reform."None of our communities are safe when the police can murder people with impunity or when routine encounters escalate into deadly shooting sprees," said Alanah Odoms Hebert, executive director of the ACLU of Louisiana.Racist suspect Lafayette Mayor-President Josh Guillory defended the officers' "numerous efforts to de-escalate the situation" in astatementissued Saturday. “An armed individual was shot and killed by Lafayette police officers after an extended pursuit, numerous efforts to de-escalate the situation, and multiple tries to subdue the knife-wielding suspect through the use of tasers.The officers opened fire when it became apparent the armed individual was attempting to enter a convenience store, threatening the lives of the customers and workers inside. While the incident has drawn significant media attention and protests, our personnel won’t be distracted – they remain focused on ensuring the health and safety of our people.Also, as twin tropical storms close in on our community, our frontline professionals in law enforcement, healthcare and emergency response remain focused on keeping our city and parish safe.Our thoughts and prayers are with our community tonight, and with the men and women in uniform who put their lives on the line every day to keep us safe.“[MORE]From [HERE] Declaring that “[r]acism still exists and has no place in society,” theTennessee Supreme Courton June 25, 2020 directed its Access to Justice Commission (AJC) to create “a new initiative to identify and eliminate barriers to racial and ethnic fairness and justice.” The court’s pronouncement, at the height of the racial justice protests that swept the nation following the murder of George Floyd by a white Minneapolis police officer, was meant to signal its concern about racial bias in the legal system.For these words to be more than symbolic, commentators have responded, they must be backed up by action. And, they say, redressing the racial discrimination that sentAbu-Ali Abdur’Rahmanto Tennessee’s death row a good place to begin.In a July 22 commentary inTennessee Lookout,Dr. Sekou Franklin(pictured), a professor of political science and international relations at Middle Tennessee State Univesity, detailed what he called “a troubling pattern of prosecutorial misconduct and racial bias” that infected Abdur’Rahman’s trial. One week later, in a guest column inThe Tennessean, veteran defense lawyerJim Thomasassailed the continuing “extraordinary efforts” being made by Tennessee Attorney General Herbert Slatery to undo a court-approved plea deal that would remove Abdur’Rahman from death row because of prosecutorial misconduct, ineffective defense representation, and the unconstitutional race-based use of jury strikes to exclude Black jurors from serving on the case.Today, eight of the jurors who sentenced Mr. Abdur’Rahman to death say they would not have done so if they heard all the facts. [more]The goal of those efforts, Thomas wrote, is simply “to kill a Black man whose trial was indisputably tainted by racial discrimination in the jury selection process.” Writes Franklin, “If the AJC is committed to addressing racial justice, it can start with capital punishment and the ongoing legal dispute over Abu-Ali Abdur’Rahman’s … death penalty conviction.”Abdur’Rahman was convicted and sentenced to death in Nashville in 1987 for a bloody double stabbing in which one person was killed. The state and federal courts initially upheld his conviction, but in September 2019, after his death warrant had been signed, Nashville District Attorney Glenn Funk and defense lawyers reached a settlement in which Abdur’Rahman would receive a life sentence in exchange for not seeking a new trial. Funk told Davidson County Criminal Court Judge Monte Watkins at the time that “[t]he pursuit of justice is incompatible with deception” and conceded that Abdur’Rahman’s trial had been infected by “overt racial bias.”The trial court approved the settlement, but Slater then sought to intervene, claiming that the District Attorney and the court had no authority to disturb Abdur’Rahman’s conviction and death sentence. In oral argument in the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals on June 9, Slatery’s office never addressed the evidence of prosecutorial misconduct and racial bias in the case. Instead, it argued that Abdur’Rahman’s death sentence should be reinstated in the interests of “finality.”Franklin’s commentary says that “[t]he court’s AJC’s new racial justice initiative has promise, but only if the group has the courage to address systemic racism. Racialized policing, prosecutorial misconduct, tainted jury pools, wrongful convictions, harsh sentencing laws and racially conservative attitudes produce a consortium of injustice that determines who lives and dies.” Pointing to evidence of injustice in the case, he says, “[a]s a good-faith measure, the AJC must support the consent order that cancels Abdur’Rahman’s death sentence.”Franklin notes that, in a bloody pair of stabbings, a forensic analysis by the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation (TBI) found that Abdur’Rahman had no blood stains on his clothes. Prosecutor John Zimmerman, however, withheld that TBI report from the defense and offered Abdur’Rahman’s co-defendant a six-year sentence in exchange for testifying that Abdur’Rahman wielded the knife. Zimmerman also “falsely accused Abdur’Rahman of wanting to take over the Nashville drug trade,” Franklin says, and in “a dog-whistling tactic probably intended to provoke negative views about Black criminality among the White jurors,” Zimmerman told the jury Abdur’Rahman had been wearing a “dark ‘gangster coat’” at the time of the murder.Franklin also noted that Zimmerman, who had during one training session he taught advocated the race-based use of jury strikes, struck African Americans from the jury in Abdur’Rahman’s case, questioning “their ‘intelligence’ and academic qualifications.”In his column, Thomas said that what he found “most striking” in Slatery’s efforts to execute Abdur’Rahman “was the extraordinary level of cynicism” in actively intervening in a case to carry out a racially tainted death sentence. “[W]hatever the outcome of the attorney general’s misbegotten appeal,” Thomas wrote, “the state’s gamesmanship in its efforts to achieve finality for Abdur’Rahman, despite the racial animus that pervaded his trial, is a discredit to the fair and impartial administration of justice.”From [HERE] Following a similarsuit by police unions, labor reps for state troopers and correctional officerssued Wednesdayto overturn New York City’s ban on chokeholds. They say the ban criminalizes the maneuver even if no injury occurs, and that it encroaches on the authority of the state police superintendent. [more] In other words the NY PBA and NY Corrections officers believe they should have the power to use chokeholds on citizens so long as they don’t harm anyone and don’t have any criminal intent when are doing their strangulations.The suit explains,Section 10-181 criminalizes the use of any restraint that restricts the flow of air or blood "'by compressing the windpipe or the carotid arteries on each side of the neck, or sitting, kneeling, or standing on the chest or back in a manner that compresses the diaphragm, in the course of effecting or attempting to effect an arrest. " Section 10-181 is a strict liability penal statute which lacks any intent or other mental state requirement. In the same vein, criminal liability under the law attaches regardless of whether the prohibited conduct actually causes any injury. Criminal liability further attaches during the apprehension of an offender in New York City even if the criminal act occurred elsewhere in the State of New York.Any violation of the statute's terms, even absent intent or resulting injury exposes Plaintiffs to prosecution as a misdemeanor which can result in imprisonment of up to a year.Section 10-181 also threatens the plaintiffs with fines for doing their jobs in good faith with no intent to harm a suspect irrespective of whether a suspect even suffers injury. Section 10-181 thus goes far beyond a law governing police misconduct.”It also states;“Of equal importance is the fact that Section 10-181 directly impacts and conflicts with the ability of the Superintendent of State Police to make rules and regulations, subject to approval by the governor, for the discipline and control of the New York State Police. See N.Y. Exec. L. §215(3) Thus, state troopers operating trader the rules and regulations of the Superintendent, approved by the governor, are now subjected to different standards of policing and conduct than those promulgated by the Superintendent. Accordingly, preemption is warranted.”From [HERE] Despite stay-at-home orders amid the coronavirus pandemic and months of protests against police brutality, Americans were still shot by police at the same rate in 2020 as in previous years, according to a new American Civil Liberties Union report.Thereport, published by the ACLU on Wednesday, shows that from 2015 to 2019, an average of 19.4 fatal police shootings occurred per week in the country over the first half of the year.Despite the pandemic and months of anti-racism protests, the U.S. had the exact same average number of police shootings per week for the first half of 2020.As of June 30, police officers had fatally shot 511 people, more than the 484 shot during the same period in 2019.For the past five years, police have shot nearly 1,000 people per year, totaling at least 5,442 deaths from January 1, 2015, to June 30, 2020.Demographic breakdowns of the fatalities show police shootings disproportionately impact Black Americans.Of those shot by police, 24% are Black, though Black people make up about 13% of the U.S. population, and 46% are white, though white people account for 60% of the U.S. population.The report explainsThe killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police officers on May 25, 2020 was horrific, but it was not unusual. People rose up in protest in streets across America not because such brutality was unprecedented, but because police violence — inflicted disproportionately on people of color — is and always has been woven into the daily fabric of American life. Police in the United States kill an obscene number of people every year. The actual number is not known because the data is not tracked, reported, collected, or analyzed in a systematic fashion. At minimum, we know that police kill more than 1,000 people annually.1 Even this conservative figure far exceeds the number of people killed by police in other wealthy countries.2 For perspective, police in America kill people at least three times the rate of their law enforcement counterparts in Canada, a wealthy country with the next highest rate of killing, and at least 16 times the rates of Germany and England.3The epidemic of police violence has been directly and disproportionately targeted at Black people. Indeed, police have played a primary role in anti-Black violence since their inception as an institution. For example, a sociological study in 1933 of 100 lynchings found that white police officers had participated in at least half of all lynchings, and that in 90 percent of others, law enforcement stood by, complicit in their inaction, as mobs murdered Black people.4 Just as police are more likely to stop, frisk, arrest, and jail Black people than white people,5 they are more likely to shoot and kill Black people. One study found that young unarmed male victims of deadly force by police are 13 times more likely to be Black than white.6 At current levels of risk, Black men face about a one in 1,000 chance of being killed by police over the course of their lives. Stunningly, for young men of color, police use of force is now among the leading causes of death.7 Mirroring the lack of media attention often given to women and nonbinary people of color killed by the police,8 there is a dearth of research examining racial disparities in police killings among nonmale populations. However, some data indicates that although women are less likely than men to be killed by police overall, Black women and Native American/ Indigenous women are more likely to be killed by police than white women.9, 10 Furthermore, while police killings are higher in high-poverty areas than low-poverty areas for all racial groups, Black people who live in more affluent areas are almost as likely to be killed by police as white people who live in the poorest areas.11 The onset of the coronavirus pandemic, during which state governments have issued stay-at-home orders and imposed social distancing requirements, and many police departments have sought to minimize police-initiated contact with the public (by, among other measures, reducing the number of traffic and pedestrian stops),12 would suggest a reduction in police killings. This report examines whether unprecedented societal isolation combined with police departments relaxing routine enforcement corresponds to a decrease in the frequency with which the police fatally shoot people, and whether such force continues to be used disproportionately against Black, Brown, and Native American/ Indigenous people. As detailed in the following results section, we found that despite COVID-19, the rate of fatal police shootings has remained the same nationally. In some states, the rate has even increased. [MORE] DR FRANCES CRESS WELSING EXPLAINED, “Within the historic framework of Western civilization and culture (the civilization and culture organized to prevent white genetic annihilation), all white peoples have the spoken or unspoken mandate to participate actively in their collective struggle for global white genetic survival. This specifically means, of necessity, the murder and slaughter of Black and other non-white males whenever it is felt within the white collective to be necessary and, therefore, justified.Because Black males, of all non-white males, have the greatest potential to genetically annihilate the white collective, Black males will experience the greatest ferocity of white supremacy's attack through justifiable homicide. Because Black and other non-white males have the potential to produce white genetic annihilation through the use of their genitalia and because genetic annihilation is the most fundamental fear of the global white collective, this collective (consciously or unconsciously) evolved a "counter" weapon or system of weapons, that theoretically could achieve non-white genetic annihilation.“ [MORE]

TAGS:BrownWatch 

<<< Thank you for your visit >>>

Hot Websites