AWAKENING OF AMERICA

Time 2021-09-18 08:24:31

Web Name: AWAKENING OF AMERICA

WebSite: http://clifylq.livejournal.com

ID:195955

Keywords:

AWAKENING,OF,AMERICA,

Description:

By logging in to LiveJournal using a third-party service you accept LiveJournal's User agreementSaturday, May 7th, 20168:21 amTHE WAR ON WOMEN ...... NOT OF THIS EARTH WOMEN SHOULD KNOW WHY GOD MAKES THEM SUFFER WHEN GIVING BIRTH. IT’S BECAUSE WOMEN HAVE DISOBEYED HIS LAWS! “HAPPY” MOTHER’S DAY?The First Sin!For I do not allow woman to teach, or to exercise authority over men; but she is to keep silent. For Adam was formed first, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a TRANSGRESSOR.Genisis 316Then the Lord said to the woman,“You will suffer terribly when you give birth, But you will still desire your husband,and he will rule over you.” http://awakeningofwomen.com/man-gods-image/The Second Sin?Women Today Have Rebelled Against God’s Law! DivorceFeminismLesbianismAdultryAbortionProstitutionPornographyPedophiliaBestiality(Click On All Photos) https://www.pinterest.com/clifflindquist/war-on-women/“When the Devil decides to destroy a society, he starts off with the woman.” —Pastor Jack Hyles http://awakeningofwomen.com/the-truth/ Current Mood: angry (Comment on this)Friday, March 25th, 20167:18 amMADAM PRESIDENT AND FIRST LADY BILL FOR 2016?? Current Mood: AFRAID FOR US (Comment on this)Wednesday, March 9th, 20166:16 amTHE PRESIDENT OF AMERICA BARRY SOTERO IS A FAGGOT THE PRESIDENT OF AMERICA BARRY SOTERO AND HIS FIRST LADY IS A MANThe following excerpt is the true biographical information of Michelle Obama, given to me on June 25, 2011 by a former member of the First Lady’s personal staff. He shall remain anonymous for the time being to protect his life as well as the lives of his family.“Michelle Obama, First Lady of the United States, was born Michael LaVaughn Robinson in Chicago, Illinois on January 17th, 1964. He was the second sonborn to Fraser Robinson III, a well known cocaine dealer and union thug for Crime Lord/Mayor Richard J. Daley, and Marian Shields Robinson, a transient street prostitute who was diagnosed with the HIV virus in 1998.He was a popular high school athlete and in 1982, he accepted a scholarship to play middle linebacker for the Oregon State Beavers.After finishing a respectable rookie season with 88 tackles and 7.5 sacks, he suddenly dropped out of the school. Fellow teammates observed that Robinson could regularly be heard lamenting over how he is a “woman trapped inside a man’s body”, and on January 13th, 1983, he underwent sex reassignment surgery at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. To hide the shame of his new identity, Michael left Oregon State to attend Princeton University under his new legal name, “Michelle Robinson”. Years later, he met Barry Obama Jr. a Kenyan immigrant who later became aware of “Michelle’s” true identity. They subsequently married and adopted two children.” http://christwire.org/…/shocking-new-revelation-about-mich…/Michelle Obama AKA Michael La Vaughn Robinson is masquerading as the "First Lady" America. How sick is that and how far down the cesspool of evil our country has fallen. Not to be out done the next selected president for us promises to be even more evil than the two fags operating the oval office now, and that is Hillary R. Clinton. God help us all!!http://awakeningofwomen.com/hillaryclinton/Video Proof Michelle is a MAN,- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2EKzoh6AAo Current Mood: GREAT (Comment on this)Thursday, January 14th, 201612:19 pmRESIDENT OBAMA’S STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS RESIDENT OBAMA S STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESSSoetoro/Obama, being ineligible/unqualified due to his lack of being natutal born means that Obama will be usurping the powers of the Office of President of the United States. It will result in every, yes every law that Soetoro/Obama signs, every appointment to an Ambassador or Judgeship, all will be invalid. Soetoro/Obama is setting himself up to be blackmailed, both internally and externally. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/101780.htmlREFERENCES:Obama refuses to say pledge of allegiancehttp://clifylq.livejournal.com/90831.htmlObama born bred a Muslimhttp://clifylq.livejournal.com/91350.htmlObama the real personhttp://clifylq.livejournal.com/91995.htmlZionist controlled presidents past and presenthttp://clifylq.livejournal.com/100815.html Current Mood: PISSED (Comment on this)Thursday, December 31st, 20151:52 pmAMERICA CHO0SE YOUR NEW YEAR'S RESOLUTION LIFE OR DEATH http://clifylq.livejournal.com/130703.html?mode=reply#add_commentWHAT IS YOUR NEW YEAR S RESOLUTION AMERICA LIFE OR DEATH?(God or Satan)The Evil of Zionism is Part of God s Plan for AmericaYou may be thinking, when did God predict all this would happen in America? Nothing is ever mentioned about Americans in the Bible and Koran. The Covenant was made between God and the Israelites of 3,500 years ago, so how did YOU become obligated to perform under that Covenant? http://clifylq.livejournal.com/111118.htmlWe human+Beings have a very long and consistent history of listening to Satan s seductive lying voice, then believing it, giving in to temptation, and doing our own will (Satan s really) instead of God you only need to read the stories of Adam Eve, Cain Able, Noah vs. the rest of the world; and Abraham vs. the people of Sodom Gomorrah for proof of that. Given our Free-will, God allows Satan to tempt us as much as he wants (Job 1:6-12, 2:1-10), which provides God with countless opportunities to know which voice we prefer to listen to: either God (through the Holy Spirit) or Satan (through the selfish human nature); and whether we choose to do good or evil. https://themarshallreport.wordpress.com/2015/10/15/breaking-news-putin-announces-defending-christians-against-obamas-terrorists-operation-salvation/ Current Mood: GAY (Comment on this)Saturday, December 26th, 20155:52 pmVLADIMIR PUTIN FOR PRESIDENT OF AMERICA TO SAVE US FROM ZIONISTS EVIL http://clifylq.livejournal.com/111118.html?mode=reply#add_commentAMERICA NO MATTER WHICH PRESIDENT THEY HAVE CHOSEN FOR YOU , IT WILL MAKE NO DIFFERENCE. HE/SHE WILL ONLY ANSWER TO THE BIDDING OF ZIO ISRAEL LEADING US TO THE END OF OUR FREEDOM TO BE SLAVES TO COMMUNISM OR MURDERED CONSISTENT WITH THEIR POPULATION PLAN OF DESTROYING OVER 80% OF THE POPULATION. THE ONLY TRUE ANSWER MY FRIENDS IS THE TOTAL OVER THROW OF THIS EVIL GOVERNMENT RULING US TODAY WITH GOD S BLESSING.THAT S WHY I SAY VLADIMIR PUTIN WOULD MAKE THE BEST PRESIDENT OF AMERICA I.E.,HE S NOT A FAGGOT, HE S NOT AN ATHIEST, AND HE UNLIKE OBAMA WAS BORN IN RUSSIA. OBAMA WAS BORN IN KENYA UNDER NUMEROUS ALIASES. HIS REAL NAME IS BARRY SOTERO. https://www.facebook.com/Putin-for-US-President-in-2016-595721563845384/PRESIDENT PUTIN I SEE YOU. AS HOPE FOR WE AMERICANS. PRESENTLY WE ARE ON A FAST TRACK TO OUR DESTRUCTION ON THE COURSE WE ARE ON NOW! GOD HELP US.http://clifylq.livejournal.com/130703.html?mode=reply#add_commentPAST US PRESIDENTS ZIONIST CONTROLLEDhttp://clifylq.livejournal.com/28691.htmlTHE NEXT PRESIDENT BILLIONAIRES OWN AMERICAhttp://www.rense.com/general75/nextp.htm AMERICA.... WHAT IS THE .. GREAT AWAKENING OF AMERICA .. SARAH PALIN IS TALKING ABOUT HERE??WELL IF YOU PUT AWAKENING OF AMERICA INTO THE GOOGLE SEARCH ENGINE YOU WILL SEE IT NUMBERED SECOND ON THE FIRST PAGE. IT IS ALSO THE PROPER NAME FOR MY BLOG NAMED BELOW (CLIFYLQ@LIVEJOURNAL.COM) WITH A VALUE OF OVER $400 MILLION DOLLARS AND TOPPING OVER 30 MILLION OTHER BLOGS SITES.http://clifylq.livejournal.com/47385.htmlCLIFYLQ S LIVEJOURNAL WEB SITE IS VALUED AT $433.8 MILLION US DOLLARSREVIEW OF CLIFYLQ.LIVEJOURNAL.COMClifylq.livejournal.com is ranked 108 in the world (among the 30 million domains), a low rank means that this website gets lots of visitors. This site is relatively popular among users in the Russia. It gets 50.9% from Russia. This site is estimated worth $433,761,527USD. This site has a low Page rank (1/10). It has 365,539 backlinks. It s good for seo website.Clifylq.livejournal.com has 57% seo score.Clifylq.livejournal.com is safe and can be available by children, contains no malicious software and is not used for phishing. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/I WANT TO THANK THOSE OF YOU FROM OTHER COUNTRIES THAT REVIEW MY SITE ESPECIALLY THOSE OF YOU FROM RUSSIA THAT HOLDS THE HIGHEST VIEWERSHIP OF AWAKENING OF AMERICA. I WANT TO HONOR YOU IN RUSSIA WITH THIS COMMENT FROM ME BY SIMPLY SAYING... I SEE YOU . clifylqhttp://clifylq.livejournal.com/111118.htmlTHE MEANING OF I SEE YOU IN AVATARWhen the Na vi meet, they greet each other with, I see you . The phrase is more than a simple greeting though. I see you is an acknowledgement.Think about it. Why tell someone you see them? Isn t it obvious that you see them? Obvious unless you are implying something more than the obvious when you say you .What this acknowledgement means is simply empathy. It means that you acknowledge the other as one like yourself. It means that the I and the You are the same parts of a bigger whole. Empathy and compassion are at the root of all great religions of the world.What this awareness does is that it makes the individual recognise his place in the world. It makes him humble and it makes him care for the world around him (like the Na vi in Avatar).IN A TELEVISED CHRISTMAS MESSAGE ON JANUARY 7 2008 PUTIN SAID: The Russian Orthodox Church contributes to the promotion of moral values in society. One should not completely draw a line between the culture and the church. Of course by law in our country the church is separate from the state. But in the soul and the history of our people it s all together. It always has been and always will be. Current Mood: hopeful (Comment on this)Monday, November 30th, 20159:42 amBILLARY CLINTON DOES WACO AND QUALIFIES FOR PRESIDENT OF AMERICA http://www.apfn.org/apfn/hillary_waco.htmSaturday Feb. 10, 2001; 11:32 a.m. ESTTripp: Hillary Directed Waco, Bill Abused Monica Hillary Clinton pressured the late Vince Foster to resolve the 1993 Waco stand-off in a move that led to the deaths of more than 80 men, women and children, former White House aide Linda Tripp charged in an interview Friday night. Tripp also alleged that Monica Lewinsky was more of a victim of Bill Clinton s sexual predations than the former White House intern has publicly acknowledged.Appearing on CNN s Larry King Live, Tripp suggested that Foster, at Mrs. Clinton s direction, transmitted the order to move on the Branch Davidian s Waco compound, which culminated in a military-style tear gas attack on the wooden structure.The compound burst into flames hours later as federal troops used a U.S. Army tank to ram the building and insert flammable gas. http://www.apfn.org/apfn/hillary_waco.htmTHE WACO MASSACRE ..... http://www.serendipity.li/waco.htmlAMERICAFor Hillary to even be considered as our next president over our once God fearing country, shows just how far down the cesspool we have sunken into evil. Both Clintons belong behind bars on death row to rot for their sins against God and treason to this country. The same thing goes for the present occupant of the white house Resident Barry Sotero AKA Barack Obama. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/91776.htmlAmerica, do you actually want to consider such an evil person As Hillary Clinton for our next U.S. President? Look in the eyes of the children posted on the photo above and try to feel how much pain they were put threw burning from the thermite bombs Hillary directed her government goons to ignite them with and burn them to a Crisp! Yes that s GOING TO BE America s NEW President consistent with all the EVIL that permeates throughout our Godless country today. Consider Hillary s other attributes here America and be sure to vote for her a WOMAN to replace a BLACK MAN . Never mind how evil they might be for our nation. WOW How totally non politically correct! LOL!!MADAM PRESIDENT HILLARY CLINTON 2016?http://clifylq.livejournal.com/23815.htmlGod Help Us ALL!!Condoned by Awakening Of Womenhttp://awakeningofwomen.com/ Current Mood: angry (Comment on this)Wednesday, August 12th, 20154:41 pmSECRET GOVERNMENT ANTIGRAVITY FLEET CODE NAMED SOLAR WARDEN https://www.pinterest.com/clifflindquist/ufo-exposing-solar-warden/Today theatres all across America premier Star Trek - the latest in a series of movies based on Gene Rodenberry s famous television series about humanity s future as a space-faring civilization. The new movie returns to the original crew of the Star Trek television series. It shows how they were recruited to join Starfleet and to boldly go where no one has gone before. One trailer shows a brawling James Kirk being challenged by a Starfleet officer to follow in his dead father s footsteps and join Starfleet. Starfleet was Rodenberry s futuristic view of humanity s destiny. Starfleet, however, may not just exist in Rodenberry s creative mind. If a number of military and corporate whistleblowers are to be believed, Starfleet exists in a highly compartmentalized program called Solar Warden a secret antigravity space fleet under the control of U.S. Strategic Command.In the hit television series, Starfleet is described as the defense, research, diplomacy, and exploration force of the United Federation of Planets. While Rodenberry s famous television series is depicted as science fiction elements of it appear to be based on fact. According to President Ronald Reagan s diaries: Space truly is the last frontier and some of the developments there in astronomy etc. are like science fiction, except they are real. I learned that our shuttle capacity is such that we could orbit 300 people. Was Reagan secretly briefed about the real Starfleet and how in 1985, it had the capacity to place 300 people in orbit?A growing fleet of antigravity vehicles has been one of the most highly classified secrets in U.S. history. Based on classified antigravity research conducted in the 1950s, a fleet of antigravity vehicles were eventually built. Whistleblowers have come forward to describe various classified programs where antigravity principles were used in part or in whole. Part one of this series of articles described various antigravity vehicles such as the TR-3B, the Aurora, and B-2 bomber. Credible researchers and aviation experts were also cited who have confirmed the reality of antigravity technologies and their successful development.Most importantly, a fleet of antigravity space vehicles has been allegedly created under the military code word Solar Warden. Part two of this investigatory series discusses various sources revealing the existence of Solar Warden and its most likely location within U.S. Strategic Command. Solar Warden, according to cited whistleblowers, has already established bases on the moon and mars, and is involved in interplanetary exploration.Strategic Command currently contains the space commands of the three main U.S. military services. These are the Air Force Space Command, the Naval Space Command and the US Army Space Command. If Solar Warden is the correct code name for a secret antigravity space fleet, then according to a manual for military code names, Solar Warden designates a joint forces command project. As a joint forces command, Solar Warden draws upon the different U.S. military space commands but would be institutionally hidden in one of the space commands. USAF Space Command is the older (activated on 1 September 1982) and better known space organization within Strategic Command. The real Starfleet, however, is more likely institutionally hidden and controlled by the Naval Space Command which officially began operations October 1, 1983. Naval Space Command serves as the Alternate Space Control Center to the USAF Space Command and also detects, tracks, identifies, and catalogs all man-made objects in space. Naval Space Command therefore has the capacity to control the real Starfleet.When British hacker Gary McKinnon first found his way into classified files of U.S. Space Command (later incorporated into Strategic Command on October 1, 2002), he discovered a number of naval terms such as fleet-to-fleet transfers concerning non-terrestrial officers. He said:I found a list of officers names under the heading Non-Terrestrial Officers . It doesn t mean little green men. What I think it means is not Earth-based. I found a list of fleet-to-fleet transfers , and a list of ship names. I looked them up. They weren t US Navy ships. What I saw made me believe they have some kind of spaceship, off-planet. McKinnon s conclusion of a U.S. Navy space fleet is supported by the comments of a serving U.S. naval officer who has revealed in private interviews that the U.S. Navy is in charge of policy when it comes to the use of advanced off-planet technologies. All this indicates that Solar Warden is institutionally hidden within US Naval Space Command.While Star Trek the movie will be a hit for those wishing to exercise their imaginative capacities, Solar Warden is an elusive fact for those using their investigative abilities. By all accounts, Solar Warden is the real Starfleet though Star Trek will help get you there. President Obama has yet to name an administrator for NASA. It is not unprecedented for a new President to delay. President Bush waited until November of his first year in office before naming Sean O Keefe as the new administrator. The delay in naming a replacement to Michael Griffin means important decisions about future NASA operations are being made by acting administrator, Christopher Scolese. Major decisions have been taken to lay off personnel when the Space Shuttle is retired in 2010 despite a Congressional request to consider ways to extend the Shuttle service life. Also, NASA managers last month decided to trim the crew capsule of the Constellation Project the Space Shuttle s replacement - from six to four. The Constellation aims to take astronauts to the moon and mars, and service the International Space Station. Obama s delay in announcing a new administrator reflects the widespread view that he gives NASA a low priority. This is reflected in the steady decline in NASA s budget in real terms since the end of the Apollo missions in the early 1970s. NASA s decline is inevitable. If whistleblower reports are accurate, then NASA is little more than a cover for a highly classified antigravity space fleet that regularly takes hundreds of military astronauts into space. The alleged name of this secret project is Solar Warden .As discussed in part one of this series, President Ronald Reagan alluded to a highly classified space fleet in the June 11, 1985 entry in his diaries where he revealed that our shuttle capacity is such that we could orbit 300 people. A succession of whistleblowers and aeronautical experts have come forward to reveal various details of advanced antigravity technologies that can, in the words of Ben Rich (former Lockheed Skunkworks CEO) take ET home. If Reagan s comments and whistleblower testimonies are correct, then the operational home of this secret antigravity space fleet, as shown in part one, is U.S. Strategic Command. The project name of the classified space fleet, according to several whistleblowers is Solar Warden . The existence of Solar Warden, if true, proves that NASA is a cover program using antiquated rocket propulsion technologies. If so, the futuristic Constellation Program aimed to take astronauts to the moon and mars is a cover for an existing space program that regularly flies interplanetary missions using advanced antigravity propulsion technologies.The first reference to Solar Warden occurred in March 2006. A reliable source, according to administrators of the Open Minds Forum, revealed its existence and capacities.All space programs are a cover that exists to deceive the people of this world. We have a space fleet, which is codenamed Solar Warden. There were, as of 2005, eight ships, an equivalent to aircraft carriers and forty-three protectors, which are space planes. One was lost recently to an accident in Mars orbit while it was attempting to re-supply the multinational colony within Mars. This base was established in 1964 by American and Soviet teamwork.Another source describing Solar Warden is an anonymous whistleblower known as Henry Deacon who works at Laurence Livermore laboratories as a physicist. Deacon s true identity is known to the creators of the Project Camelot website who have witnessed his credentials and believe him to be credible. According to Project Camelot, Henry confirmed the existence of a large manned base on Mars, supplied through an alternative space fleet (codename SOLAR WARDEN). According to Wiliam Arkin s manual for military code names which designates specific two letter alphabetical sequences to distinct U.S. military projects, Solar Warden falls into a Joint Forces Command project. This suggests Solar Warden is operationally located within Strategic Command as claimed in part one.If Solar Warden has been successful in establishing a Mars colony using antigravity propulsion systems, then this might explain why antigravity research became highly classified in the mid-1950s. It also would explain why civilian researchers who successfully replicated antigravity technologies were ruthlessly suppressed as occurred to Otis Carr in 1961. This suppression was revealed for the first time in 2007 through the testimony of Carr s former protege, Ralph Ring.A growing number of whistleblower and expert testimonies point to the existence of a highly classified antigravity space program that can place hundreds of military astronauts in space. If Solar Warden or a similar classified military program does exist, then it is understandable why President Obama has delayed appointing a new NASA administrator. NASA s steady decline since its Apollo heyday has nothing to do with the competence and expertise of NASA personnel. The political reality is that highly compartmentalized military programs prevent advanced antigravity technologies into the public sector for commercial application. NASA s new futuristic Constellation Program, based as it is on antiquated rocket propulsion technologies from the 1940 s, is a cover program and does not deserve to be funded. Instead, U.S. military and corporate projects involving advanced antigravity technologies and the means by which these were acquired need to be exposed to the American people. July 21st of this year, when Space Shuttle Atlantis landed at NASA s Kennedy Space Center in Florida and headed to a museum, we were told that the U.S. no longer had any space-capable vehicles, and that we would have to rely on Russia and other countries to get into orbit and visit the Space Station.That was a lie.In actuality, since the late 1980s, the U.S. has a secret Space Fleet, its program code-named Solar Warden , and which has now grown to eight cigar-shaped motherships (each longer than two football fields end-to-end) and 43 small scout ships .The US Space Fleet operates under the US Naval Network and Space Operations Command (NNSOC) [formerly Naval Space Command], headquartered in Dahlgren, Virginia. There are approximately 300 personnel at NNSOC s Dahlgren facility.The US Space Fleet s vessels are staffed by Naval Space Cadre officers, whose training has earned them the prestigious 6206-P Space Operations specialty designation, after they have graduated from advanced education at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California and earned a Master of Science degree in Space Systems Operations.Both the Navy and the Marine Corps furnish men and women officers to this program. Jarheads in space? You betcha!Because of its advanced technological position, Cabal will use its fleet to attack star visitor craft. This space-security mission is two-fold.One part of the Space Fleet s mission is to the global-elite control group, the Cabal, to attack star nation ships and engage in space warfare against the star nations.Because the Space Fleet has the job of being Space military within our solar system, its program has been named Solar Warden.The Space Fleet operates not only with classified U.S. Government authority but also with the united nations.They have also colonized people on the Moon too, and never went back, as the Dracs are there too, and have done this also on both of Mar s satellites .They are still owned, and operated by them, and shoot people down all the time, and the missing Nasa satellites have all been destroyed, and others from other countries, when they get too close to these areas. They will NOT allow themselves to be seen viewed by us. They hate this. They also destroyed Mars rovers too, for the same reasons. Do you still want to vacation to these places? You will have to do battle with them if you go. http://www.truthcontrol.com/forum/secret-black-goverment-antigravity-fleet-code-named-solar-wardenThe Blue Sphere Alliance (Aliens) want to help earth by exposing the truth about the evil cabal Illuminati that has a grip on the planet. These aliens want to STOP the oil cartels from preventing Earth its rebirth into high technologies and energy use away from oil. This Is How The Solar Warden And Blue Sphere Alliance Will Change Life. FRIENDS THE ILLUMINATI IS THE ROCKEFELLERS, THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANKSTERS, THE ROTHSCHILDS AND MOST OF OUR CORPORATE BUSINESS LEADERS ESPECIALLY HERE IN THE USA. THEY HAVE BOUGHT AND PAID FOR THE PREDENCY OF AMERICA BUT THE ILLIMINATI S DAYS ARE NUMBERED AND THEY ARE ALREADY STARTING TO FLEE TO BRAZIL TO HIDE FROM THE MASSIVE ARRESTS OF THIS EVIL CABAL. THUS AS OBAMA S PUPPET MASTERS SLINK INTO THE HOLES AND BACK UNDER THE ROCKS, SO TOO WILL OUR EVIL GOVERNMENT THAT IS DESTROYING OUR BELOVED AMERICA. ENJOY YOUR EVIL RULE MR. SOTERO AKA BARRACK OBAMA FOR THE HANGMAN WILL BE SEEKING OUT THOSE OF YOU BEHIND THE EVIL THE ILLUMINATI THAT HAS CUT ITS THROAT WITH MILLIONS OF LIVES DESTROYED BY THEM. YOU HAVE SIX MONTHS MR. OBAMA TO CLEAR OUT OF THE OVAL OFFICE BEFORE THE TRIBUNALS START. TAKE YOUR BOYFRIEND MICHELLE WITH YOU AND ALL THE ZIONIST POSING TO BE JEWS OF ISRAEL. I M SURE THERE IS PLENTY OF ROOM IN BRAZIL FOR YOU TWO!!LETTER TO OBAMA TO HELP WITH FREE ENERGY. LOLhttp://www.theorionproject.org/Energy.pdf Current Mood: EXHILARATED (Comment on this)Friday, March 6th, 201510:06 amAMERICA'S DEATH BY BATHROOM COMING SOON....... TO A BATHROOM NEAR YOU AND OF COURSE YOUR FAMILY !!PREVIEWS: OF COMING ATTRACTIONS BRINGING YOU CANCER, HEART DISEASE, STROKE, ALZHEIMER S AND MANY MORE INCREDIBLE DEATH DEALING TOXIC INGREDIENTS CONDONED BY OUR OWN EVIL GOVERNMENT, BIG PHARMA, BIG BUSINESS AND FOR ONE PURPOSE, POPULATION CONTROL AND PROFIT ON YOU SUFFERING/DIEING. HOW COOL IS THAT AMERICA? CLIFYLQhttp://cliffsasisel.com/death-bathroom/ Current Mood: angry (Comment on this)Tuesday, December 23rd, 20141:47 pmWHAT IS PINKWASHING AMERICA? AND WHO IS AOW? MISSION STATEMENTIf you do a Google search for the caption War on Women you will find that it is being politicized by either the Democrats or Republicans as a political football for the purpose only to gain votes. There is no REAL concern for women for such things as this web site identifies such as the declining health of women either due to toxic chemicals they use for bathroom purposes or proper medical treatment that is the cause for many such diseases and abuse women suffer from namely, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, heart disease, stroke etc. Women are purposely being manipulated into thinking that simply marching for pink ribbons will put a stop to breast cancer albeit that march just keeps on marching on and on for over 50 years and no cure for cancer has been forthcoming. Please notice I used forthcoming! This web site asks where is all the millions that the marching pink ribbons raised gone to? There is a cure for cancer and it has been known for over 30 years but you don t see any marching for it do you? The sick truth ladies is that there is NO money in any cure but TRILLIONS for its treatment.This web site Awakening of Women is our attempt to get women on board with us to say NO MORE pink washing away of our money for NO results. We need a new march of women only this time for the truth about putting a stop to breast cancer NOW not another 50 years from now! Please join us by first making a donation on the Support tab to show you agree with us that something needs to be done to put a STOP not only to breast cancer, but to all the toxic chemicals being used in this country that are in both our cosmetic/skin care products even our toothpaste and mouthwash used by women and second, join our team on Sisel to be either a preferred customer or a distributor to help other women stop using toxic products in their homes that are the real cause of breast cancer and many other diseases women suffer from in America today.Sisel uses only NON toxic products not only for women but for the entire family. Even our coffee is toxic free and is actually good for you unlike most other coffee that have acrylamides and free radicals. http://awakeningofwomen.com/toxic-cosmetics/REFERENCES:AOW BLOGhttp://awakeningofwomen.com/blog-2/DEATH BY BATHROOMhttp://awakeningofwomen.com/death-bathroom/PROP 65http://awakeningofwomen.com/prop-65/THE CAMPAIGN FOR SAFE COSMETICShttp://www.safecosmetics.org/CONTACT:Cliff LindquistPhone: 760-751-9557Email: clifylq@aol.comOR:Linda Lomeli (Say obla Espanol)Phone: 559-718-0832Email: lindalomeli3@gmail.comP.S. For all my fans who know me by my psedo name clifylq, if you want more of these kind of postings by me then visit this link and prove to me how serious you are to know the ugly truth the truth about the WAR ON WOMEN! My last posting I made as it pertains to curing cancer had over one million views. http://awakeningofwomen.com/support/Follow Us On Face Book: https://www.facebook.com/clifylq Current Mood: calm (Comment on this)Tuesday, April 2nd, 20137:15 amTHE CURE FOR CANCER FINALLY! AMERICAN'S ARE LITERALLY DIEING FROM EATING ANIMAL BASED DIETS! .................. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/127275.html?mode=reply#add_commentWAKE THE FUCK UP AMERICA CANCER IS TOTALLY CURABLE BUT NOT IN OUR GOVERNMENThttp://clifylq.livejournal.com/126289.html Why cure cancer since the Medical Establishment in America (AMA, ACS) can profit on you ladies suffering and dying from breast cancer and still promote their population control agenda? It s a win win situation for them and their evil being waged on the WOMEN in America today using such evil groups as Komen/Avon and their pink washing of ribbons marching you right into their bank accounts going on now for over 50 years with NO cure for cancer. clifylq LADIES what most of you may not know is that we live with cancer inside our body every day normally. Every day new cancer cells form but our immune system manages to kill them off. Our bodies fight off cancer inside us without us even knowing it. It s when a tumor forms that something is wrong but even that tumor took many years to grow that size. Cancer is a very slow growing disease. Most doctors who use the traditional treatment used today i.e., burn, slash, poison, want to rush the patent into treatment just as soon as possible. What they manage to do is to destroy the very immune system that naturally destroys cancer cells and once the kemo has worn off, the cancer comes back with a vengeance to finally kill off the patient. The cancer criminals i.e., AMA, ACS today say that if a patient lives for 5 years after the kemo that s a success. Sick Bastards! Then there is the ugly side effects of cancer destroying the organs, hair loss, sickness etc. many victims die from the treatment vs. the cancer. As a matter of fact if the patient did not have the kemo they would probably live much longer than after the cancer treatment was performed! Once the kemo fails to cure the patient their doctor sends their immune destroyed victim home to die of the very disease the doctor helped kill them with. How cool is that ladies?The only answer to our failed medical response to cancer in America today is steer clear of the allopath s and their bag of tricks to make you sick and make them wealthy. Ultimately you die from their helping you. It s a win win situation for their NWO bosses to destroy over 80% of the (female) population.Homeopaths have the right answer to curing cancer and that is to start eating a plant based diet instead of an animal based one. That s it! That s the answer to curing many of the diseases in America today including those Medical Clowns who say are not curable like, aides, HIV, diabetes, heart disease, Alzheimer s, lupus, breast cancer and many others. Just click on to the link provided here to see other doctors and their research that reveals thousands of people who have been cured and many of them are the very patients their doctors told them to go home and die. LinkIt s time ladies to rise up in one voice and put a STOP to these criminals who run the medical profession in America today to include those who allow such totally evil companies like MONSANTO to put their poisonous seeds into our food supply via GMOs and condoned by our government. NOTE: Obama just passed the Farmer Assurance Provision. Section 735 of this bill actually grants Monsanto immunity from federal courts pending the review of any GM crop that is thought to be dangerous. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/125800.html?mode=reply#add_commentWhat s wrong with this picture LADIES? And what are you going to do to help me put a STOP to these Mad Men over the medical community and their Nazi Storm Troopers in the FDA profiting on our suffering and deaths from their cancer? clifylqhttp://awakeningofwomen.com/http://clifylq.livejournal.com/http://www.lindquistinvestigationservices.com/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/clifylq..... http://www.clifylq.com/LADIES I GIVE YOU THE CURE FOR ALL DISEASES IN AMERICA TODAY INCLUDING BREAST CANCER BUT DO YOU THINK THE EVIL KOMEN OR OTHER FRAUDS PINK WASHING THEIR CANCER CURE MARCHES LIKE AVON WILL MARCH FOR A BETTER DIET FOR US? WILL THEY RAISE MONEY TO FEED THOSE OF US WITH A DISEASE TO BUY VEGETABLES AND FRUITS AND STOP THE ANIMAL FOOD INDUSTRY CAUSING ALL OF OUR DISEASES IN AMERICA? I DON T THINK SO SINCE THEY ARE TOO WELL PAID MARCHING FOR NO CURE FOR OVER 50 YEARS NOW. BUT STILL MANAGE TO FILL THEIR ZIO COFFERS WITH YOUR MARCH MILLIONS TO PAY THEIR EMPLOYEES HIGH SALARIES AND MARKET THEIR EVIL AGENDA OF POPULATION CONTROLS. MUST WE STILL HEAR THEIR SLOGAN EVERYONE DESERVES A LIFE TIME OF PAYING US YOUR MARCH MONEY FOR NO CURE TO CANCER?NEW: I FOUND OUT THAT NOT ONLY MEAT AND WHAT YOU ARE EATING LADIES CAUSES YOU CANCER BUT ALSO THE TOXIC PRODUCTS IN YOUR BATHROOMS. I HAVE A LINK CALLED DEATH BY BATHROOM. CHECK IT OUT NOW TO SEE WHAT I MEAN PROVING THAT THERE IS A WAR ON WOMEN IN AMERICA! Link PRETTY SICK HUH? HELP ME TO HELP YOU LADIES.. Link (32 Comments |Comment on this)Tuesday, March 26th, 201311:52 amTHE WAR AGAINST WOMEN IN AMERICA BY BIG COMPANIES AND THEIR POISENOUS PRODUCTS I HAVE OSTEOPOROSIS WHAT CAUSED IT AND WHAT S THE BEST WAY TO TREAT IT?As a consultant I advise those who have Osteoporosis to exercise their body to help strengthen their bones. I have included recommended exercises by the NOS. I have also listed a natural means to increase your bone density vs. using what is called Eating Rocks mentality of companies pandering calcium supplements that are really mined rocks from sand stone and limestone quarries. The body can t breakdown these elements and throws them off to be stored to cause arthritis and God knows what other ailments. It s not normal to put anything but natural substances in your body not rocks that the body can t get rid of. So what s the answer then?Here is part of the acknowledgement section of my new ebook on osteoporosis:ACKNOWLEDGEMENTAmerica the evil we face in our country is so vast and not unlike an onion in that trying to peel it to its core, every peel reveals yet another worse fate for us to suffer from. I know that it is difficult for the average person to believe that our own evil government is trying to kill off the population but it s unfortunately very true!In simply trying to help a friend who was diagnosed with osteoporosis to find a good calcium supplement, I found out that what is being displayed in stores like Costco in plastic jars at a reduced price and sounding like a great deal turns out to be in essence selling rocks to their consumers to eat.Yes that s right rocks most of the calcium being used and marketed as calcium supplements today are being mined from rock quarries such as marble and sandstone. Almost every calcium supplement on the market is made from marble or limestone. If you look at your current calcium product, the supplements facts box will call it calcium carbonate or calcium citrate or some other name, but it is simply ground up rocks! You wouldn t think of making a peanut butter and marble sandwich, or a lemon and limestone pie, so why eat rock calcium supplements?You might have wondered why your calcium pills are large and hard to swallow, then constipate and causes digestive discomfort. Now you know why! But tolerability issues are just the tip of the iceberg warning us of more sinister problems with rock based calcium supplements.This ebook I ve written is for my friend to help her with osteoporosis but now I m offering what I found to be the best calcium supplements using natural foods vs. rocks that may be the cause of heart attacks, or arthritis from the un-used rocks you ingested and are placed in the various parts of our bodies later to cause a variety of problems.In addition this ebook tells how to prevent osteoporosis and get calcium the natural way in plants and minerals vs. rocks and how to strengthen your bones. OSTEOPOROSIS TREATMENT CAUSES TO BE AWARE OF by Cliff Lindquist, http://www.cliffs3-daywalk.comLADIES DID YOU KNOW THAT SIMPLY COOKING FOR YOUR FAMILY CAN KILL THEM?A new study published in the International Journal of Electrochemical Science has discovered that cooking with aluminium increases the risk of developing Osteoporosis and Alzheimer s Disease.The human body can tolerate 1mg of aluminium per 1kg of bone weight before it begins to accumulate in the brain.ASTONISHINGLY, it was found that up to 139.2 milligrams of aluminium per person could be consumed in one meal depending on how the food was prepared.It is common practice around the world to cook, prepare and store food in aluminium. When aluminium is cold, leakage into food is minimal. However, when food is prepared in environments above 150c (302f), aluminium leakage into food becomes alarming.The researchers examined five different types of meat (beef, water buffalo, mutton, chicken, and turkey) that were packed in aluminium foil and cooked in ovens at various temperatures above 150c.They found that aluminium concentration exploded by 378% in red meats and 215% in poultry.It was also identified that fat content in meat, in addition to the cooking process, impacted on how much aluminium was found in food.It was also identified that fat content in meat, in addition to the cooking process, impacted on how much aluminium was found in food.It was also revealed that highly acidic foods wrapped in aluminium foil contained twice the amount of aluminium and that the size of an aluminium cooking pan also determined how much aluminium leaked into food.Food manufacturers frequently use aluminium to store and preserve food. It s cheap and highly malleable. However, there are ways to reduce your intake of aluminium from your diet.WHAT ABOUT COOKING ITEMS MADE WITH ALUMINUM LIKE MY RICE COOKER?We cook rice and grains frequently, as do many Asian-Americans. We have used plastic-bowl microwave vessels, aluminum teflon pots, steam pressure cookers and several others over the past five plus decades. They all work, but each has a down side. We feared aluminum toxicity, teflon ingestion, plastic leaching and plain uncertainty of what new epidemiologic research will unleash on us tomorrow. My wife and I have conveniently labeled our failing intellects as chronic rice-in toxicity. Forget age, it must be all that peeling cooking pot and rice!What should we use to cook rice for our family that is safe for us then?How to Reduce Aluminium from Your Diet: OSTEOPOROSIS TREATMENT CAUSES TO BE AWARE OF by Cliff Lindquist, http://www.cliffs3-daywalk.comLADIES HOW MANY OF YOU DRINK OUT OF WATER BOTTLES?Do you know what bottled water company has FLOURIDE FREE water?Did you know Aqua Fena is a great tasting water but it is made by Coca Cola the same company that makes Gatoraid and both are made from tap water?If you want an example of two companies engaged in hyping worthless beverages, look no further than Coke and Pepsi. In my opinion, both of these companies operate with an astonishing lack of integrity -- not only in the way they hype their bottled water products, but also in their ongoing marketing of beverages that I am convinced are closely tied to the obesity and diabetes pandemics now ravaging our world.Coke and Pepsi have, in my opinion, played a significant role in the destruction of human health among advanced nations over the last three generations. Not only do they aggressively market disease-promoting beverages containing high-fructose corn syrup (linked to diabetes) and phosphoric acid (linked to osteoporosis), but they also use another chemical substance in their diet drinks that many naturopathic practitioners consider to be a neurological poison: Aspartame!Knowing the true history of Coca-Cola and Pepsi it s no surprise that these two companies would find a way to dishonestly market bottled water products, too. Failing to disclose the real source of these bottled water products is, in my view, an inexcusable lapse in corporate responsibility. I have no doubt that whatever products these two companies may market in the future, they will always be marketed in a way that is dishonest, harmful to human health and damaging to the environment.Then which bottled water is safe for me to drink? OSTEOPOROSIS TREATMENT CAUSES TO BE AWARE OF by Cliff Lindquist, http://www.cliffs3-daywalk.comLADIES DO YOU KNOW WHAT IS THE BEST WAY TO FILTER OUT FLOURIDE FROM YOUR DRINKING WATER AT YOUR HOME?Many of you use the reverse osmosis technique but for it to actually work it must be with same high pressure that is maintained commercially by bottled water companies. Not a home facsimile of one. To insure you are safe from fluoride poisoning at home you must also include an additional filter on your drinking tap water inside the home.I use Brita to filter my drinking water from fluoride is that safe?Other more common filtration methods such as Brita filters, boiling your water and freezing your water do not remove fluoride from your water. Brita does NOT remove fluoride!! Nor does freezing or boiling it!!Does the Alumina Filters work then to filter out fluoride?NOTE: We do not recommend the use of Alumina as a fluoride reduction filter. If your water s chemistry is not just right, aluminum can leach into the water. Alumina has a very short shelf life (3 to 4 months) and won t remove chlorine, pesticides or THM s. Alumina imparts a bitter taste to your water so it is necessary to add carbon filtration as the last step or stage.So what is the best recommended filtration system that does remove the fluoride and other bad elements in my drinking water?This type of filtration is used to reduce/remove heavy metals like cadmium, lead, iron, mercury, copper, manganese, aluminum, zinc, arsenic, nickel, fertilizers, radio-nuclides, pesticides, radium, uranium and herbicides. It is the chosen media for fish farming and has been shown to remove Dichlorvos (Nuvan), Tributyl Tin Oxide and Malochite Green as well as turbidity and odors. It is excellent for removing fluoride and is safe for all water applications. The Answer is; OSTEOPOROSIS TREATMENT CAUSES TO BE AWARE OF by Cliff Lindquist, http://www.cliffs3-daywalk.comLADIES DO YOU EVEN KNOW WHAT IT IS YOU ARE COOKING WITH IN YOUR KITCHEN TODAY? I MEAN REALLY?... LET S TEST YOU,-Do any of you know what used to be called, Rape Seed Oil? Believe it or not the FDA banned it back in the 50 s from consumers for its high toxic ness but the Canadians brought it back in the 70 s and changed its name to Canola Oil. Do any of you ladies use Canola Oil for cooking your food? If you do it will interest you to know that Canola Oil is being used as a pesticide by such companies as Lilly Miller VEGOL Year-Round Pesticidal Oil. (Made with 96% Canola Oil).PRETTY SICK HUH??Check out this video that helps put a finer point on what Canola Oil really is and how such company s as Cisco gets away with selling you cooking oil/pesticide to cook your families food.ARE YOU EATING PESTICIDES? CANOLA OIL GREAT INSECT KILLERCanola oil is a very effective insecticide, and it is the primary ingredient in many organic (non-chemical) pesticide control products sprayed on vegetables to kill bugs. I covered this in my canola oil pesticide video : http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=AEE77E1636E97778AB05E6F31D6B1C27CLICK THIS LINK TO GET CLIFYLQ S 17 WAYS TO STAY HEALTHY AND AVOID SICKNESS http://www.clifylq.com/natural-cures-for-cancer/#comment-143LADIES LIKE I SAID ABOVE THERE IS A WAR GOING ON AGAINST YOU AND ALL AMERICANS TO DESTROY OUR WAY OF LIFE. WHETHER IT BE IN OUR EATING HABITS, DRINKING HABITS, BREATHING OR TREATMENT THEY ARE BEHIND A VERY SINISTER PLAN TO DESTROY US ALL!! WAKE UP TO WHAT I AM SAYING HERE IN MY 80 PAGE EBOOK ON OSTEOPOROSIS. IT S FREE ONCE YOU ORDER MY 108 PAGE EBOOK CALLED THE QUACKS WHO CURED CANCER .ORDER: OSTEOPOROSIS TREATMENT CAUSES TO BE AWARE OF by Cliff Lindquist, http://www.cliffs3-daywalk.comclifylqhttp://clifylq.blogspot.com/http://clifylq.livejournal.com/http://cliffs3-daywalk.com/index.htmlhttp://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/http://www.lindquistinvestigationservices.com/ http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/2013/03/there-is-war-going-on-against-women-in.html#links Current Mood: Mad (Comment on this)Sunday, March 24th, 201310:01 amWOMEN BEWARE-MAMMOGRAPHY TESTING & PINK RIBBON CURE FOR CANCER FRAUD! .................................http://cliffs3-daywalk.com/WOMEN BEWARE-MAMMOGRAPHY TESTING PINK RIBBON CURE FOR CANCER FRAUD!August 6, 2012By Lilly O Brien -All across America, men and women participate in run for the cure events, raising tens of millions of dollars each year that go into the hands of Komen for the Cure. What these people don t know is that much of that money is spent on free mammograms. Those mammograms, in turn, actually cause breast cancer because they subject women to high doses of ionizing radiation. (naturalnews.com)Monday, August 06, 2012 by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger Naturalnews.com reports:Women s Mammography Testing Cure for Cancer Pink Ribbon a Fraud!The Susan G. Komen scam, in essence, is to raise money that s used to give women cancer and create a financial windfall for the very same companies that financially support Komen in the first place. The Komen Foundation owns stock in General Electric, one of the largest makers of mammogram machines in the world. It also owns stock in several pharmaceutical companies, including AstraZeneca, reports Tony Isaacs at NaturalNews DuPont, another huge chemical company and major polluter, supplies much of the film used in mammography machines. Both DuPont and GE aggressively promote mammography screening of women in their 40s, despite the risk of its contributing to breast cancer in that age group. And while biotech giant Monsanto sponsors Breast Cancer Awareness Month s high profile event, the Race for the Cure, it continues to profit from the production of many known carcinogens. (http://www.tbyil.com/breast-cancer-deception.htm)The bottom line? Komen deceives women while powerful corporations rake in the profits. This isn t merely my own opinion. Two prominent doctors, in an article published in the British Medical Journal, have sharply condemned Komen for the Cure for lying about the benefits of mammograms.Their names? Steven Woloshin and Lisa Schwartz, directors of the Center for Medicine and the Media at Dartmouth Medical School in Hanover, New Hampshire.They join a growing number of other doctors and medical professionals who now see Komen for the Cure as afundraising fraudand are going public with detailed accusations against Komen s deceptions.In the recently published BMJ article, Woloshin and Schwartz accused Komen of lying in its promotional propaganda for the 2011 Breast Cancer Awareness Month. In advertising, Komen falsely claimed the 5-year survival rate when breast cancer is caught early is 98%, while only 23% when not caught early. This is how Komen tricks women into getting more mammograms which cause more cancer by claiming early detection saves lives. But it s not science; it s pure propaganda.According to study authors Woloshin and Schwartz, Komen willfully ignored a growing and increasingly accepted body of evidence [showing] that although screening may reduce a woman s chance of dying from breast cancer by a small amount, it also causes major harms. Here s an image published by the British Medical Journal, detailing how Komen for the Cure is lying about mammography: http://www.naturalnews.com/gallery/articles/Komen_Deception_BMJ.jpgHow mammograms kill womenWoloshin and Schwartz explain that anywhere from 20% to 50% of women who receive mammograms for a decade of their lives will have at least one false alarm. These false alarms often lead to women being treated with deadly chemotherapy cocktails. These expensive drugs enrich the very same drug companies that donate money to Komen for the Cure. This is all part of the cycle of fraudthat exploits women s bodies for profit, all while conducting this sick fraud with the message of finding a cure, emblazoned with pink ribbons. The magnitude of the deception in all this is pathological even criminal.That harm often comes in the form of unnecessary chemotherapy that poisons womenbut financially benefits the drug companies. Here s another article on NaturalNews which also supports this conclusion:Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/036711_Komen_for_the_Cure_mammography_fraud.html#ixzz22mpGZyX2Corporate PartnersKomen s corporate partners include General Mills, Zumba Fitness, Walgreens, The Republic of Tea, REMAX, New Balance, American Airlines, Bank of America, Ford Motor Company, Dell and many moreSusan G. Komen for the Cure is dedicated to setting new standards for creative collaboration in the fight against breast cancer.Our corporate partners provide us with the opportunity to reach people where they live, work, and play. In addition to a financial contribution, each of these organizations have found a unique way to get their customers and employees involved in raising young awareness and hope that we will one-day find the cures. We thank them for their commitment to the fight to end breast cancer. There are 125 plus partners you are familar with the brands that use the cure for cancer PINK RIBBON to make you support their FRAUD. Click Here to check out the 125 partners brand names.http://ww5.komen.org/corporatepartners.aspxObscene executive salaries Susan G. Komen for the Cure is a multimillion-dollar company with assets totaling over $390 million . Only 20.9% of these funds were reportedly used in the 2009-2010 fiscal year for research for the cure, writes Emily Michele at Alternet (http://www.alternet.org/story/154010/i_will_not_be_pinkwashed%3A_kome )She goes on to explain, I don t know about you, but I would never expect directors of a charitable non-profit organization to make more than most doctors, lawyers, or even politicians. Their CEO and president, Hala G. Moddelmog, made $531,924, plus $26,683 in change. That s more than President Obama makes. Komen spends about 39% of its money on public health education, which is just another way to say pinkwashing. This money is used to catapult the Komen propaganda so that future fundraising events can raise even more money, much of which is paid to Komen s fat cat executives as cushy salaries.Just remember: When you run for the cure, a significant portion of the money you raise is going straight into the pockets of wealthy Komen executives. None of the money is actually being used to promote vitamin D or cancer prevention. Detection, after all, is not prevention. It s just a way to push the cancer industry s agenda of treating more women with toxic chemotherapy chemicals (and more ionizing radiation).Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/036711_Komen_for_the_Cure_mammography_fraud.html#ixzz22mrDRTBIAre you going to support PINK RIBBON PRODUCTS and take the MAMMOGRAPHY?Exposed: 10 Facts about the Breast Cancer Industry You re Not Supposed to KnowMyth #2: Pink ribbon products are sold to raise money to support breast cancer victims.The Truth: Nearly 100% of the funds are used to recruit more breast cancer patients into highly-lucrative treatments that do more harm than good.You know where all that money goes that you donate to the search for the cure and other cancer scams? Virtually none of it goes to actually teach women how to prevent cancer. The World Health Organization says 70% of all cancers are preventable, but the breast cancer industry helps zero percentof women actually prevent it.Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/024536_cancer_women_breast.html#ixzz22mt5OjshMyth #5: Regular mammograms are the best way to detect cancerThe Truth: Mammograms harm 10 women for every one woman they helpMyth #7: The cancer non-profits are searching for a cure for cancerThe Truth: Even if one was found, they would never allow a cure to be publicized: It would destroy the cancer treatment industry. It s the great scam of the cancer industry: We re searching for a cure, they claim! Never mind the fact that they ve been using this same con since the late 60 s, when they claimed to be only a few million dollars away from curing cancer forever.Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/024536_cancer_women_breast.html#ixzz22ms5esXAre these results because we are taking the mammography? Graph shows North America, Europe, and Australia that force you to take the mammography have the largest numbers of cancer .Figure that one out. Do your research. http://kojoreport.com/women-beware-mammography-testing-pink-ribbon-cure-for-cancer-fraud/- See more at: http://kojoreport.com/women-beware-mammography-testing-pink-ribbon-cure-for-cancer-fraud/#sthash.O6co6oir.dpufclifylqhttp://clifylq.blogspot.com/http://clifylq.livejournal.com/http://cliffs3-daywalk.com/index.htmlhttp://ravediet.com/?PARTNER=RDLCLhttp://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/http://www.lindquistinvestigationservices.com/http://www.whale.to/a/mammography_h.htmlWomen s Mammography Testing Cure for Cancer Pink Ribbon a Fraud!The Susan G. Komen scam, in essence, is to raise money that s used to give women cancer and create a financial windfall for the very same companies that financially support Komen in the first place. The Komen Foundation owns stock in General Electric, one of the largest makers of mammogram machines in the world. It also owns stock in several pharmaceutical companies, including AstraZeneca, reports Tony Isaacs DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT LADIES HERE: .http://cliffs3-daywalk.com/ Current Mood: Mad (Comment on this)Tuesday, March 12th, 20135:10 pmKOMEN/AVON BREAST CANCER DECEPTION - HIDING THE TRUTH BEHIND A SEA OF PINK http://www.tbyil.com/breast-cancer-deception.htm BREAST CANCER DECEPTION - HIDING THE TRUTH BEHIND A SEA OF PINKBy Tony IsaacsEvery year October is Breast Cancer Awareness Month and we find the country awash in a sea of pinkfrom shore to shore from pink ribbons and donation boxes to pink products, charity promotions,celebrities by the score and even pink cleats on NFL players. Tragically, few people are aware of the dark history of Breast Cancer Awareness Month (BCAM) and the players past and present who have misused it to direct people and funds away from finding a true cure while covering up their own roles in causing and profiting from cancer.The Founding of Breast Cancer Awareness MonthMost people are unaware that the BCAM idea was conceived and paid for by the British chemical company Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI), a company that both profited from the ever-growingcancer epidemic and contributed to its causes. The American subsidiary of Imperial Chemical Industries, ICI/Astra-Zeneca manufactures tamoxifen, the world s top-selling cancer drug used for breast cancer. ICI itself is in the business of manufacturing and selling synthetic chemicals and is one of the world s largest producers and users of chlorine.Although BCAM was co-founded along with two non-profit organizations and some big name companies were quick to associate with BCAM, for the first several years, BCAM s bills were paid by ICI s Zeneca Pharmaceuticals. As the controlling sponsor of Breast Cancer Awareness Month (BCAM), Zeneca was able to approve orveto any promotional or informational materials, posters, advertisements, etc. that BCAM uses. The focus is strictly limited to information regarding early detection and treatment, avoiding the topic of prevention and the role toxins may play. A further look at the major players in breast cancer awareness may give plenty of insight as to why a growing number of critics are asking why such is the case.Take Zeneca for example, which later merged into Astra-Zeneca and in 2008, ICI/Astra-Zeneca changed its name to AzkoNobel and reported annual sales of over 22 Billion Dollars. ICI has long been among the world s largest manufacturers of pesticides, plastics, and pharmaceuticals. Its Perry, Ohio, chemical plant was once identified as the third-largest source of potential cancer-causing pollution in the United States, releasing 53,000 pounds of recognized carcinogens into the air in 1996.After Zeneca acquired the Salick chain of cancer treatment centers in 1997 and then merged with the Swedish pharmaceutical company Astra to form AstraZeneca, creating the world s third-largestdrug concern, Dr. Samuel Epstein, a professor of occupational and environmental medicine at theUniversity of Illinois School of Public Health stated, This is a conflict of interest unparalleled in the history of American medicine. You ve got a company that s a spinoff of one of the world s biggest manufacturers of carcinogenic chemicals, they ve got control of breast cancer treatment, they ve got control of the chemoprevention [studies], and now they have control of cancer treatment in eleven centers-which are clearly going to be prescribing the drugs they manufacture. The breakdown of $14 Billion in profits for ICI in 1997 was 49 percent from pesticides and other industrial chemicals, another 49 percent from pharmaceutical sales, and the remaining 2 percent from health care services including 11 cancer treatment centers. Zeneca s herbicide acetochlor, which is classified by the EPA as a probable human carcinogen , and which AstraZeneca sold until a corporate reorganization in 2000, accounted for around $300 million in sales in 1997. Their product tamoxifen citrate (Nolvadex) accounted for $500 million in 1997 sales. Cancer prevention would clearly conflict with Zeneca s business plan.Quickly jumping onboard the tamoxifen bandwagon was the National Cancer Institute, which announced in April 1998 that breast cancer could be prevented by treating women continuously with apowerful drug called tamoxifen. The New York Times editorialized on April 8th that treating womenwith tamoxifen is a breast cancer breakthrough. However, The Times acknowledged that treating1,000 women with tamoxifen for five years would prevent 17 breast cancers but would cause anadditional 12 cases of endometrial cancer and 20 cases of serious blood clots in the same 1,000women.As recent studies have shown, the risks implied in those less-than breakthrough figures were vastly understated. For example, as Natural News reported in 2009, a study published in Cancer Research concluded that long-term use of tamoxifen actually increases the risk of getting aggressive cancer in the other breast by 440 percent.See:http://www.naturalnews.com/027123_cancer_Tamoxifen_brst_cancer.htmlOther large corporations which contribute to breast cancer awareness also have a vested interest in breast cancer. In many instances, these not only profit from cancer, they also sell products which cause cancer. Thus, at the same time that they promote their products they also help direct research and treatments away from their toxic and cancer causing products.General Electric sells upwards of $100 million annually in mammography machines. General Electric has also been a major polluter of carcinogenic PCBs in the Hudson River. An estimated million pounds of PCBs lie buried at the bottom of a 40-mile stretch of the Hudson, where GE dumped PCB oil until the mid-1970s, contaminating the entire 200-mile length of the river below Hudson Falls.DuPont, another huge chemical company and major polluter, supplies much of the film used inmammography machines. Both DuPont and GE aggressively promote mammography screening of women in their 40s, despite the risk of its contributing to breast cancer in that age group.Biotech giant Monsanto is a major sponsor Breast Cancer Awareness Month s high profile event, the Race for the Cure. At the same time, Monsanto reaps huge profits from products which cause breastand other cancers. Monsanto s genetically engineered bovine growth hormone, rBGH, is widely used to to increase milk production in cows and milk with rBGH contains up to 10 times the naturally occurring growth hormone Insulin-like Growth Factor I (IGF-1). Studies have shown that women with elevated levels of IGF-1 are 7 times more likely to develop pre-menopausal breast cancer and the hormone has been identified as one of the leading risk factors for breast cancer as well as colon and prostate cancer.A study published in the October, 2012 edition of the journal Food and Chemical Toxicology provided unprecedented evidence of the cancer causing dangers of the combination of Monsanto s genetically modified corn and Monsanto s herbicide Roundup, which the corn was modified to withstand. Female rats fed GMO corn treated with Roundup developed large mammary tumors more often than and before controls and died 2 - 3 times faster than control groups. The pituitary was the second most disabled organ. Treated male rats developed 4 times more large tumors than controls and the tumor development occurred up to 600 days earlier, primarily in the livers and kidneys.Another large player is Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), with their Tour of Hope and promotions such as10 cent donations for drug store sales of selected BMS products. BMS is also the manufacturer ofTaxol (under the trade name of Paclitaxel), considered to be the gold standard of chemo drugs. As Natural News reported earlier this month, the so-called gold standard has more than lost its luster, as was presented at 27th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: German investigators from Friedrich-Schiller University in Jena, have shown that taxol (the gold standard of chemo ) causes a massive release of cells into circulation. Such a release of cancer cells would result in extensive metastasis months or even years later, long after the chemo would be suspected as the cause of the spread of the cancer. This little known horror of conventional cancer treatment needs to be spread far and wide, but it is not even listed in the side effects of taxol. See:http://www.tbyil.com/Chemo_Does_Not_Cure.htmNowhere is the hypocrisy of the Breast Cancer Awareness Movement more evident than in the actionsof do good cosmetic and body care companies, including such industry powerhouses as Est e Lauder, Avon, Revlon, and Mary Kay. Annually, they market pink-ribboned packaged cosmetics andbody care products as well as contribute funds which help continue the cover-up up and misdirection of breast cancer research, treatment and prevention. Many of the same products they push as part of their campaign contribute to breast and other cancer.Hormone-mimicking chemicals such as parabens and phthalates have been shown to increase the risk of breast cancer and have a broad range of birth defects. A study published in the Journal of Applied Toxicology in 2012 detected paraben esters in 99 percent of breast cancer tissues sampled.The list of corporate donors and players in Breast Cancer Awareness goes on and on, including other chemical and pharmaceutical companies, cosmetic companies, fast food restaurants, donut and cookie makers, and many more. They all share the common traits of promoting awareness while excluding the role their own products play, and promoting early screening through mammograms. Likewise, other charities and foundations and their sponsors - have joined the pink bandwagon, and once again, they have common links of promoting early detection, primarily through mammograms, and remaining mostly silent about toxins and other environmental factors.The Foundations and CharitiesA pink giant among breast cancer foundations is the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation, famous for their annual Race for the Cure , and which has a huge list of corporate sponsors, including such notables as General Mills and Mars Snackfoods among their Million Dollar Elite club. The Komen Foundation has a lengthy list of risk factors, yet does not list exposure to toxins among them;See:http://ww5.komen.org/breastcancer/loweryourrisk.htmlAs noted in the 2003 article Compromised : Participants in the Race for the Cure are often greeted as they cross the finish line with live music, inspirational speakers and acres of colorfully adorned corporate booths. Pink, the chosen color of the international breast cancer movement, is everywhere, on hats, T-shirts, teddy bears and ribbons. A sense of community and camaraderie pervades the celebration by thousands of breast cancer survivors and friends of survivors. What s missing is the truth, says Judy Brady of the Toxic Links Coalition in San Francisco. She wants to see a cure for breast cancer as much as anyone, but she and her group, along with several other activist breast cancer groups, have something to point out about the Susan G. Komen Foundation s activities: There s no talk about prevention except, in terms of lifestyle, your diet for instance. No talk about ways to grow food more safely. No talk about how to curb industrial carcinogens. No talk about contaminated water. Source: http://tampa.creativeloafing.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid:3332 Though giving some lip service to the debate over mammograms , the Komen Foundation neverthelesspromotes mammograms as an important screening tool and recommends that women get regular mammograms starting at age 40, stating that despite some ongoing debate, mammography is still thebest screening tool widely used today for the early detection of breast cancer. The Komen Foundation owns stock in General Electric, one of the largest makers of mammogram machines in the world. It also reportedly owns stock in several pharmaceutical companies, including AstraZeneca (now AzkoNobel).AstraZeneca has long been a Komen booster, making educational grants to Komen and having a visiblepresence at the Race For the Cure. At the 1998 Food and Drug Administration hearings, the KomenFoundation was the only national breast cancer group to endorse the AstraZeneca cancer treatmentdrug tamoxifen as a prevention device for healthy but high-risk women, despite vehement opposition by most other breast cancer groups because of its links to uterine cancer.Another prominent breast cancer organization is The National Breast Cancer Foundation, whose stated mission is to save lives by increasing awareness of breast cancer through education and by providing mammograms for those in need. Their National Mammography Program includes the Donate a Free Mammogram Program . Their education includes nothing about the toxins and environmental causes of cancer.Similarly, the Prevent Cancer Foundation, gives advice on how to prevent and detect cancer, but fails to include toxins and environmental factors and is yet another foundation which heavily promotes mammograms. Currently, they are promoting their Pledge to Screen Your Boobs Enter to Win a Pink Vespa program, seeking donations and stating that early detection and screening can help to stop breast cancer before it strikes . In other words, according to the various foundations and organizations which advocate screening and mammograms, the way to stop cancer before it strikes is to detect it after it has already struck.The following report from a woman who used natural therapies to beat a cancer mainstream doctors had said was terminal typifies how foundations such Susan G. Komen and others entrenched in the cancer industry look upon anything outside the mainstream paradigm: I was shocked an appalled when I tried to contact every single person of importance at Susan G. foundation. I had completed my traditional therapies, my stage IV metastatic disease was said to be terminal and yet here I am! No Evidence of Disease! I was euphoric and feel like God personally guided me through this process. Immediately I faxed,called, emailed dozens of people at Susan G. Komen foundation to let them know they can stop running. The only contacts I received were when they wanted me to give them money, To help find a cure. Haha! I was shocked, betrayed, appalled and sickened that no one in the research department would call me back,...I got their fax and faxed off a release of information and also my scans,....proof!Still,...no call back. The advocacy group I used stated that all foundations were like this. They don t really want to find a cure, they want to keep searching and doing experiments so that they can keep their jobs. I beat my disease, (i didn t say cured) and no one cared,...not a one. No media, no doctor, no foundation gave (me) the time of day. The American Cancer Society The World s Most Profitable Non-ProfitIf the Komen Foundation is a giant among breast cancer charities, the true 800 pound gorilla in all of the cancer non-profit organizations is the highly profitable American Cancer Society (ACS).As reported in American Cancer Society: The World s Wealthiest Non-profit Institution in theInternational Journal of Health Services, the ACS is fixated on damage control - screening, diagnosis and treatment, - and genetic research, with indifference or even hostility to cancer prevention. Together with the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the ACS has failed to provide Congress, regulatory agencies and the public with the strong body of scientific evidence clearly relating the escalating incidence of non-smoking related cancers to involuntary and avoidable exposures to industrial carcinogens in air, water, the workplace, and consumer products - - food, cosmetics and toiletries - - so that appropriate corrective and legislative regulatory and action has not been taken. Like the other foundations mentioned earlier, the ACS has myriad ties to industries which profit from and contribute to cancer. One such relationship is the one they have maintained with AstraZeneca. Together with the NCI, in 1992 the ACS launched am aggressive chemoprevention program aimed at recruiting 16,000 healthy women who were supposedly at high risk of breast cancer into a 5-year clinical trial of Zeneca s tamoxifen. The women were told that the drug was essentially harmless, and that it could reduce their risk of breast cancer. What the women were not told was that tamoxifen was well-known to induce aggressive human uterine cancer or that it has previously been shown to be a highly potent liver carcinogen in rodent tests.Other ties include board members tied to such companies as Glaxo-SmithKline Smith, Glaxo Welcome,Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, Block Drug Company, Reliant Pharmaceuticals,OSI Pharmaceuticals, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Various Lobbying Firms, Venture Capitalists,Sherwin-Williams Company and many others.To get a better picture of some of the interlocking relationships between ACS board members and the corporations and institutions they are connected with, see:http://www.muckety.com/8902C522F22BE4F05D7BB23676ADEB8B.mapAmong a great many questionable actions by the ACS that have been interpreted to be favorable tosuch institutions and industries in the past are:* The ACS opposed proposed regulations in 1977-78 for hair coloring products that contained dyes suspected of causing breast cancer. In so doing, the ACS ignored the fact that these chemicals were proven liver and breast carcinogens.* In 1982, the ACS adopted a highly restrictive cancer policy that insisted on unequivocal human evidence of carcinogenicity before taking any position on public health hazards. Accordingly, the ACS still trivializes or rejects evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals, and has actively campaigned against laws that ban deliberate addition to food of any amount of any additive shown to cause cancer in either animals or humans.* In 1992, the ACS issued a joint statement with the Chlorine Institute in support of the continued global use of organochlorine pesticides despite clear evidence that some such pesticides were known to cause breast cancer. In the joint statement, ACS Vice President Clark Heath, M.D., dismissed evidence of the risks as preliminary and mostly based on weak and indirect association. * In September 1996, the ACS together with a diverse group of patient and physician organizations, filed a citizen s petition to pressure FDA to ease restrictions on access to silicone gel breast implants. What the ACS did not disclose was that the gel in these implants had were also contaminated with other potent carcinogens such as ethylene oxide and crystalline silica.The ACS is called the worlds wealthiest non-profit for good reason. Despite annually pleadingpoverty and huge fundraising efforts across the nation, at the end of 2008, the combined ACS financial statements reflected net assets of over $1.5 Billion.A 1992 article in the Wall Street Journal by Thomas DiLorenzo, professor of economics at LoyolaCollege and veteran investigator of nonprofit organizations, revealed that the Texas affiliate of the ACS owned more than $11 million worth of assets in land and real estate, as well as more than fifty-six vehicles, including eleven Ford Crown Victorias for senior executives and forty-five other cars assigned to staff members. Arizona s ACS chapter spent less than 10 percent of its funds on direct community cancer services. In California, the figure was 11 percent, and under 9 percent in Missouri.Thus for every $1 spent on direct service in 1992, approximately $6.40 was spent on compensation and overhead. In all ten states, salaries and fringe benefits are by far the largest single budget items, a surprising fact in light of the characterization of the appeals, which stress an urgent and critical need for donations to provide cancer services. Nationally, only 16 percent or less of all money the ACS raised was spent on direct services to cancer victims, like driving cancer patients from the hospital after chemotherapy, and providing pain medication.In the intervening years, the ACS has reported spending a larger percentage of the money it raises on program services, with 26% going to direct services and another 47% being spent on research,prevention and detection/treatment services. Unfortunately, the research funds are directedalmost entirely to the same surgery, chemo and radiation therapies that have failed to win the waron cancer for almost four decades now. Likewise, prevention and detection/treatment services overlook toxins and environmental causes and promote more screening and mammograms.It is a tried and failed program of the same forms of prevention, treatment and research that hasbenefited those who profit from continuing the largely failed war on cancer while obscuring andprotecting the roles of those who have caused it.Mammograms and the Dangers of RadiationA study by researchers from the University of Nebraska and the John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Ill cast fresh doubt on the widespread assumption that regular mammograms save lives, showing that 2,970 women must be screened for breast cancer in order to prevent even one death. For a woman in the screening subset of mammography-detectable cancers, there is a less than 5percent chance that a mammogram will save her life, wrote the researchers.In 2001, a study known as the Cochrane analysis found that if 2,000 women underwent regular screening for 10 years, one life would be saved but another 10 women would undergo unnecessarytreatment such as surgery or radiation. Noting that it was difficult to determine which cancers would have led to death or even symptoms in the absence of treatment, the researchers concluded that it is not clear whether screening does more harm than good. Few will debate the value of early screening and detection, but what most doctors will not tell you, and many are unaware of, is that there is a much safer and more effective tool for early screening: thermography. As was reported in Natural News last December, a breast thermogram has the ability to identify a breast abnormality five to ten years before the problem can be found on a mammogram. Furthermore, a thermogram does not use radiation, and can be done as frequently as anyone thinks is necessary. Thermograms work by creating infra-red images (heat pictures) that are then analyzed to find asymmetries anywhere in the chest and underarm area. Breast thermography detects patterns of heat generated by the increased circulation produced by abnormal metabolic activity in cancer cells. This activity occurs long before a cancer starts to invade new tissue.See:http://www.naturalnews.com/025170_cancer_thermograms_brst_cancer.htmlMastectomies Prevention or Unnecessary Mutilation?As a result of mammograms and MRI s, many women, with the advice and consent of their doctors, opt to have radical mastectomies, which involves removal of one or both breasts along with underlying muscle tissue and lymph nodes under the arm. However, many researchers say that mastectomies areunnecessary for most women suffering from breast cancer.Two studies published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2002 showed cutting out just thelumps of diseased tissue can save as many lives as removing the whole breast. Findings of the studies showed similar death rates after 20 years for large groups of women who underwent either mastectomies or breast-saving surgery.A study of 1,851 women at the University of Pittsburgh found little survival differences between two similar groups. A similar study was done at the European Institute of Oncology in Milan where 701 women were split into two groups, one of which received mastectomies and the other had lumpsremoved and radiation treatment. About a quarter of each group died of breast cancer over 20 years.According to researchers, survival does not depend on such surgery because breast cancer is fundamentally a systemic disease, not one that simply spreads from an initial site. Many women who could have undergone more narrow surgery have chosen mastectomies on the theory that you get it out, and you re not going to have any trouble, stated Dr. Bernard Fisher, who ledthe Pittsburgh study.The Dangers of Over-Screening for CancerA new analysis published this month in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) found that screening for both breast and prostate cancer both have a problem that runs counter to everything people have been told about cancer: The screenings are resulting in finding cancers that do not need to be found because they would never spread and kill or even be noticed if left alone. That has in turn led to a huge increase in cancer diagnoses of innocuous cancers would have otherwise gone undetected.At the same time, the analysis, Rethinking Screening for Breast Cancer and Prostate Cancer alsofound that both screening tests are not making much of a dent in the number of cancers that actually are of a deadly variety. That could be because many lethal breast cancers spread rapidly and gain a foothold between mammograms. The deadly prostate cancers, on the other hand, have often already spread at the time of cancer screening. The dilemma for breast and prostate screening is that it is not usually clear which tumors need aggressive treatment. Many believe that a major reason that is not clear is because studying it has not been much of a priority. The issue here is, as we look at cancer medicine over the last 35 or 40 years, we have always worked to treat cancer or to find cancer early, Dr. Barnett Kramer, associate director for disease prevention at the National Institutes of Health, said. And we never sat back and actually thought, Are we treating the cancers that need to be treated? Finding insignificant cancers is the reason the breast and prostate cancer rates soared when screening was introduced, Dr. Kramer said. And those cancers, he said, are the reason screening has the problem called overdiagnosis - labeling innocuous tumors cancer and treating them as though they could be lethal when in fact they are not dangerous. Overdiagnosis is pure, unadulterated harm, he said.Dr. Peter Albertsen, chief and program director of the urology division at the University of Connecticut Health Center, said that had not been an easy message to get across. Politically, it s almost unacceptable, Dr. Albertsen said. If you question overdiagnosis in breast cancer, you are against women. If you question overdiagnosis in prostate cancer, you are against men. The Role of Government InstitutionsIn the National Cancer Act of 1971, the National Cancer Institute NCI was given the authority toprepare and submit an annual budget proposal directly to the President for review and transmittal to Congress. This authority is unique to NCI and allows it to bypass the traditional approvals that all other NIH Institutes and Centers must get for their budget requests. As noted above, the NCI was one of the first agencies to sign onboard with the Breast Cancer Awareness movement and its actions are greatly controlled and influenced by the American Cancer Society.Other Federal Government agencies, including other NIH Institutes and Centers, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Department of Defense, fund cancer research. In addition, state and local governments, voluntary organizations, private institutions, and industry also spend substantial amounts of money on cancer-related research.For a list of some of the federal agencies involved in cancer research and funding, see;http://www.aacr.org/home/public--media/science-policy--government-affairs/advocacy-tools/federal-agencies.aspxA 2004 press release from the Cancer Prevention Coalition detailed how President Nixon appointed athree-member NCI executive Cancer Panel following passage of the 1971 National Cancer Act, inaugurating the War Against Cancer, Benno Schmidt, its first Chairman, was a senior drug companyexecutive, with close ties to chemical, oil, and steel industries. He was followed in the 1980 s by Armand Hammer, the late oil magnate, and Chairman of Occidental Petroleum, a major manufacturer of industrial chemicals, involved in the Love Canal disaster.Not surprisingly, Schmidt and Hammer ignored cancer prevention and the major role of industrialcarcinogens, focusing instead on the highly profitable development and marketing of cancer drugs.This fox guarding the chicken coop relationship was mirrored in the MSK s Board of Overseers, most of whom were chief executives of drug, petrochemical, and steel industries. In a 1998 Washington Post interview this relationship was admitted by Samuel Broder, former NCI Director, when he stated that The NCI has become what amounts to a government pharmaceutical company. Despite the escalating incidence over the last three decades of childhood cancers and adultcancers unrelated to smoking, and despite substantial evidence relating these cancers to avoidableexposures to industrial carcinogens, NCI s conflicts of interest have remained unchanged.Misplaced Research into the Causes of CancerThe incidence of breast cancer has been increasing about 1 percent a year since 1940. In the 1940 s, a woman s chance of developing breast cancer in her lifetime was 1 in 22. Today that number is 1 in 8, a risk that has increased over 40% since 1973. In the intervening years since 1973, more American women have died from breast cancer than all Americans killed in World Wars I and II, the Korean War, and Vietnam. Breast cancer has both lifestyle and environmental causes. In particular, toxins accumulate in breast tissues, but research into the environmental links has received little funding or attention by corporate and governmental entities.Hormones have been at the center of breast cancer research for decades. In the mid-1990 s researchers began to consider the possibility that chlorinated chemicals might contribute to the rising occurrences of breast cancer and researchers Devra Lee Davis and Leon Bradlow hypothesized that environmental and pharmaceutical estrogens were likely culprits. Seen as a threat by chemical interests, the Chemical Manufacturers Association and the Chlorine Chemistry Council banded together to develop a strategy to discount Davis and Bradlow s hypothesis, including hiring a public relations firm to discredit Davis personally.This must have seemed like d j vu to Davis, who had performed extensive research into the cozy role between industry and the War on Cancer, especially the 4 decades long effort of the tobacco industry to cover up their role in the increase in lung cancer. Davis later published the results of her research in the acclaimed book The Secret History of the War on Cancer .In 2002, Dr. Ana Soto, a scientist at the Tuft s School of Medicine, testified that the swift increase in breast cancer could not be attributed to mere genetics, which had long been believed to be the major factor in whether women developed breast cancer. Soto - who has researched cell proliferation and breast cancer for more than 2 decades -- was one of several experts to testify at an informational hearing on breast cancer and the environment, jointly sponsored by the Senate Health and Human Services Committee and Assembly Health Committee in California. While many breast cancer studies focus on genetics, or lifestyle factors such as reproductive history, alcohol use and exercise, Soto said there was little being done to assess how environmental toxins may be causing cancer, reported ABC News.According to the Tufts professor of cell, molecular, and developmental biology, there is already some evidence to suggest a link: The increasing risk of breast cancer and other cancers has paralleled the proliferation of synthetic chemicals since World War II, said Soto. The Tufts professor added that only 7 percentof the estimated 85,000 chemicals registered for use in the United States have been reviewed fortoxicity. State of the Evidence 2008: The Connection Between Breast Cancer and the Environment , which wasedited by Janet Gray, Ph.D., was published by the Breast Cancer Fund, an organization which appears to have less industry influence than most others. The comprehensive report detailed the environmental exposures linked to increased breast cancer risk, including natural and synthetic estrogens; xenoestrogens and other endocrine-disrupting compounds; carcinogenic chemicals and radiation. Among the environmental factors identified that combined with genes and lifestyle factors were air pollution, consumer exposures to carcinogens, occupational exposures, pesticides and radiation.The Lack of Progress behind the Pink CurtainThere has been a great deal of glad handing and back slapping in recent years over what has beenannounced as a slight downward trend in the occurrence of breast cancer as well as annual breast cancer deaths, though black women, whose cancer rates and deaths continue to climb, likely findlittle solace in the announced trend. When one peals back the veil of so-called progress, little credit can be given to the increased screenings and mammograms touted by so many of the breast cancer organizations. Instead, most of the credit is likely due to decreased use of Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT).Further, when one subtracts the figures for DCIS, the much touted successes against breast cancer take on a complete different picture. DCIS, which stands Ductal Carcinoma in Situ, is viewed as a stage 0 cancer, and has a cure rate of almost 100%. At one time, DCIS was considered a pre-cancerous condition and was not included in cancer survival statistics.Today, when we see 5 year survival figures of 96% quoted for localized breast cancers, those figures actually fall precipitously when the 60,000 annual DCIS diagnoses are removed. A truer look at cancer survival rates would be the 77% five year survival for women whose cancer has spread locally and the dismal 5-10% five year survival rates for those whose cancers have metastasized beyond the original region.Source: http://www.pdrhealth.com/disease/disease-mono.aspx? contentFileName=BHG01ON01.xml contentName=Breast+Cancer contentId=17Though often equated as cures , survival of five years does not indicate that anyone has beaten cancer and will live a cancer free normal lifespan. In fact, those who survive for five years frequently still have cancer and most of those who are cancer free can expect a return of cancer at some point in time. The average survival time beyond five years is a mere 26 months.Regardless of the figures quoted, breast cancer remains the number one cancer killer for Hispanic women and the number two cancer killer for Black and Anglo women.Misdirected Research into Cancer Prevention and CuresAbout the authorTony Isaacs is a natural health advocate and researcher and the author of books and articles aboutnatural health including Cancer s Natural Enemy. Mr. Isaacs articles are featured at Natural News, the Health Science Institute s Healthiertalk website, CureZone, the Crusador online, AlignLife, the Cancer Tutor, the American Chronicle and several other venues. Mr. Isaacs also has The Best Years in Life website for baby boomers and others wishing to avoid prescription drugs and mainstream managed illness and live longer, healthier and happier lives naturally. In addition, he hosts the Yahoo Oleandersoup Health group of over 2600 members and the CureZone Ask Tony Isaacs - Featuring Luella May forum. You can listen to Mr. Isaacs and his partner Luella May and special guests every Wednesday evening on The Best Years in Life Radio Show broadcast by Wolf Spiritclifylqhttp://clifylq.blogspot.com/http://clifylq.livejournal.com/http://cliffs3-daywalk.com/index.htmlhttp://ravediet.com/?PARTNER=RDLCLhttp://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/http://www.lindquistinvestigationservices.com/http://www.whale.to/a/mammography_h.htmlYES LADIES THE MAMMOGRAMS YOU USE ONCE A YEAR TO CHECK FOR BREAST CANCER IS KNOWN TO ACTUALLY CAUSE THE CANCER YOU WANT TO CHECK FOR. BUT THE SICK TRUTH IS THAT THE DOCTORS PRESCRIBING IT KNOWS THIS BUT STILL BURNS YOUR BREAST WITH CANCER CAUSING RADIATION WHEN THEY COULD USE THERMOGRAM CHECKS REPLETE OF RADIATION. INSTEAD IT USES DIGITAL INFRARED. DID YOU KNOW THIS FACT? HOW MANY MAMMOGRAMS HAVE YOU HAD THUS FAR LADIES? DOES THIS PISS YOU OFF?? GO TO MY WEB SITE TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT HERE: http://cliffs3-daywalk.com/ Current Mood: MAD (Comment on this)Friday, March 1st, 20138:19 amWOMEN BEWARE-MAMMOGRAPHY TESTING & PINK RIBBON CURE FOR CANCER FRAUDS KOMEN/AVON ETC.! http://kojoreport.com/women-beware-mammography-testing-pink-ribbon-cure-for-cancer-fraud/WOMEN BEWARE-MAMMOGRAPHY TESTING PINK RIBBON CURE FOR CANCER FRAUDS!August 6, 2012By Lilly O Brien -All across America, men and women participate in run for the cure events, raising tens of millions of dollars each year that go into the hands of Komen for the Cure. What these people don t know is that much of that money is spent on free mammograms. Those mammograms, in turn, actually cause breast cancer because they subject women to high doses of ionizing radiation. (naturalnews.com)Monday, August 06, 2012 by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger Naturalnews.com reports:Women s Mammography Testing Cure for Cancer Pink Ribbon a Fraud!The Susan G. Komen scam, in essence, is to raise money that s used to give women cancer and create a financial windfall for the very same companies that financially support Komen in the first place. The Komen Foundation owns stock in General Electric, one of the largest makers of mammogram machines in the world. It also owns stock in several pharmaceutical companies, including AstraZeneca, reports Tony Isaacs at NaturalNews DuPont, another huge chemical company and major polluter, supplies much of the film used in mammography machines. Both DuPont and GE aggressively promote mammography screening of women in their 40s, despite the risk of its contributing to breast cancer in that age group. And while biotech giant Monsanto sponsors Breast Cancer Awareness Month s high profile event, the Race for the Cure, it continues to profit from the production of many known carcinogens. (http://www.tbyil.com/breast-cancer-deception.htm)The bottom line? Komen deceives women while powerful corporations rake in the profits. This isn t merely my own opinion. Two prominent doctors, in an article published in the British Medical Journal, have sharply condemned Komen for the Cure for lying about the benefits of mammograms.Their names? Steven Woloshin and Lisa Schwartz, directors of the Center for Medicine and the Media at Dartmouth Medical School in Hanover, New Hampshire.They join a growing number of other doctors and medical professionals who now see Komen for the Cure as afundraising fraudand are going public with detailed accusations against Komen s deceptions.In the recently published BMJ article, Woloshin and Schwartz accused Komen of lying in its promotional propaganda for the 2011 Breast Cancer Awareness Month. In advertising, Komen falsely claimed the 5-year survival rate when breast cancer is caught early is 98%, while only 23% when not caught early. This is how Komen tricks women into getting more mammograms which cause more cancer by claiming early detection saves lives. But it s not science; it s pure propaganda.According to study authors Woloshin and Schwartz, Komen willfully ignored a growing and increasingly accepted body of evidence [showing] that although screening may reduce a woman s chance of dying from breast cancer by a small amount, it also causes major harms. Here s an image published by the British Medical Journal, detailing how Komen for the Cure is lying about mammography: http://www.naturalnews.com/gallery/articles/Komen_Deception_BMJ.jpgHow mammograms kill womenWoloshin and Schwartz explain that anywhere from 20% to 50% of women who receive mammograms for a decade of their lives will have at least one false alarm. These false alarms often lead to women being treated with deadly chemotherapy cocktails. These expensive drugs enrich the very same drug companies that donate money to Komen for the Cure. This is all part of the cycle of fraudthat exploits women s bodies for profit, all while conducting this sick fraud with the message of finding a cure, emblazoned with pink ribbons. The magnitude of the deception in all this is pathological even criminal.That harm often comes in the form of unnecessary chemotherapy that poisons womenbut financially benefits the drug companies. Here s another article on NaturalNews which also supports this conclusion:Learn more:http://www.naturalnews.com/036711_Komen_for_the_Cure_mammography_fraud.html#ixzz22mpGZyX2Corporate PartnersKomen s corporate partners include General Mills, Zumba Fitness, Walgreens, The Republic of Tea, REMAX, New Balance, American Airlines, Bank of America, Ford Motor Company, Dell and many more Susan G. Komen for the Cure is dedicated to setting new standards for creative collaboration in the fight against breast cancer.Our corporate partners provide us with the opportunity to reach people where they live, work, and play. In addition to a financial contribution, each of these organizations have found a unique way to get their customers and employees involved in raising young awareness and hope that we will one-day find the cures. We thank them for their commitment to the fight to end breast cancer. There are 125 plus partners you are familar with the brands that use the cure for cancer PINK RIBBON to make you support their FRAUD. Click Here to check out the 125 partners brand names.http://ww5.komen.org/corporatepartners.aspxObscene executive salaries Susan G. Komen for the Cure is a multimillion-dollar company with assets totaling over $390 million . Only 20.9% of these funds were reportedly used in the 2009-2010 fiscal year for research for the cure, writes Emily Michele at Alternet (http://www.alternet.org/story/154010/i_will_not_be_pinkwashed%3A_kome )She goes on to explain, I don t know about you, but I would never expect directors of a charitable non-profit organization to make more than most doctors, lawyers, or even politicians. Their CEO and president, Hala G. Moddelmog, made $531,924, plus $26,683 in change. That s more than President Obama makes. Komen spends about 39% of its money on public health education, which is just another way to say pinkwashing. This money is used to catapult the Komen propaganda so that future fundraising events can raise even more money, much of which is paid to Komen s fat cat executives as cushy salaries.Just remember: When you run for the cure, a significant portion of the money you raise is going straight into the pockets of wealthy Komen executives. None of the money is actually being used to promote vitamin D or cancer prevention. Detection, after all, is not prevention. It s just a way to push the cancer industry s agenda of treating more women with toxic chemotherapy chemicals (and more ionizing radiation).Learn more:http://www.naturalnews.com/036711_Komen_for_the_Cure_mammography_fraud.html#ixzz22mrDRBIAre you going to support PINK RIBBON PRODUCTS and take the MAMMOGRAPHY?Exposed: 10 Facts about the Breast Cancer Industry You re Not Supposed to KnowMyth #2: Pink ribbon products are sold to raise money to support breast cancer victims.The Truth: Nearly 100% of the funds are used to recruit more breast cancer patients into highly-lucrative treatments that do more harm than good.You know where all that money goes that you donate to the search for the cure and other cancer scams? Virtually none of it goes to actually teach women how to prevent cancer. The World Health Organization says 70% of all cancers are preventable, but the breast cancer industry helps zero percent of women actually prevent it.Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/024536_cancer_women_breast.html#ixzz22mt5OjshMyth #5: Regular mammograms are the best way to detect cancerThe Truth: Mammograms harm 10 women for every one woman they helpMyth #7: The cancer non-profits are searching for a cure for cancerThe Truth: Even if one was found, they would never allow a cure to be publicized: It would destroy the cancer treatment industry. It s the great scam of the cancer industry: We re searching for a cure, they claim! Never mind the fact that they ve been using this same con since the late 60 s, when they claimed to be only a few million dollars away from curing cancer forever.Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/024536_cancer_women_breast.html#ixzz22ms5esXAre these results because we are taking the mammography? Graph shows North America, Europe, and Australia that force you to take the mammography have the largest numbers of cancer .Figure that one out. Do your research. http://kojoreport.com/women-beware-mammography-testing-pink-ribbon- cure-for-cancer-fraud/- See more at:http://kojoreport.com/women-beware-mammography-testing-pink-ribbon-cure-for- cancer-fraud/#sthash.O6co6oir.dpuf clifylqRECOMMENDED LINKS:http://clifylq.blogspot.com/http://clifylq.livejournal.com/http://cliffs3-daywalk.com/index.htmlhttp://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/http://www.lindquistinvestigationservices.com/ http://clifylq.livejournal.com/125646.html YES LADIES THE MAMMOGRAMS YOU USE ONCE A YEAR TO CHECK FOR BREAST CANCER IS KNOWN TO ACTUALLY CAUSE THE CANCER YOU WANT TO CHECK FOR. BUT THE SICK TRUTH IS THAT THE DOCTORS PRESCRIBING IT KNOWS THIS BUT STILL BURNS YOUR BREAST WITH CANCER CAUSING RADIATION WHEN THEY COULD USE THERMOGRAM CHECKS REPLETE OF RADIATION. INSTEAD IT USES DIGITAL INFRARED. DID YOU KNOW THIS FACT? HOW MANY MAMMOGRAMS HAVE YOU HAD THUS FAR LADIES? DOES THIS PISS YOU OFF?? GO TO MY WEB SITE TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT HERE: http://cliffs3-daywalk.com/ Current Mood: Angry (Comment on this)Tuesday, February 26th, 20138:36 amOBAMA ELECTS FORMER VP OF MONSANTO RULE OVER FDA AS COMMISSIONER TO DESTROY AMERICA'S FOOD SUPPLY http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-world-according-to-monsanto/Who controls the food supply controls the people; who controls the energy can control whole continents; who controls money can control the world.-- Henry KissingerTHE WORLD ACCORDING TO MONSANTOEnvironment 244 Comments There s nothing they are leaving untouched: the mustard, the okra, the bringe oil, the rice, the cauliflower. Once they have established the norm: that seed can be owned as their property, royalties can be collected. We will depend on them for every seed we grow of every crop we grow. If they control seed, they control food, they know it it s strategic. It s more powerful than bombs. It s more powerful than guns. This is the best way to control the populations of the world. The story starts in the White House, where Monsanto often got its way by exerting disproportionate influence over policymakers via the revolving door . One example is Michael Taylor, who worked for Monsanto as an attorney before being appointed as deputy commissioner of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1991. While at the FDA, the authority that deals with all US food approvals, Taylor made crucial decisions that led to the approval of GE foods and crops. Then he returned to Monsanto, becoming the company s vice president for public policy.Thanks to these intimate links between Monsanto and government agencies, the US adopted GE foods and crops without proper testing, without consumer labeling and in spite of serious questions hanging over their safety. Not coincidentally, Monsanto supplies 90 percent of the GE seeds used by the US market. Monsanto s long arm stretched so far that, in the early nineties, the US Food and Drugs Agency even ignored warnings of their own scientists, who were cautioning that GE crops could cause negative health effects. Other tactics the company uses to stifle concerns about their products include misleading advertising, bribery and concealing scientific evidence.THE EVIL OF MONSANTO AND GMOS: BAD TECHNOLOGY, ENDLESS GREED DESTRUCTION OF HUMANITYNatural NewsSeptember 23, 2012(NaturalNews) By now, nearly all informed people recognize that Monsanto is widely regarded as the most evil corporation on our planet. But what, exactly, makes Monsanto so evil? Why is Monsanto worse than a pharmaceutical company, a pesticide company or even a weapons manufacturer?The answer to this question is found in probing the virtue of the corporation in question. As virtuous people, we expect corporations to act with a sense of fundamental human decency. We expect them to behave within the boundaries of respecting human life, honest business practices and reliable science. We (naively) wish that corporations would act like decent human beings.But they don t. In their quest for profit at any cost, they violate the basic tenants of virtue. They betray humanity. They destroy life. They malign Mother Nature herself, and in doing so, they threaten the very future of sustainable life on our planet.Here, I unravel the fundamental violations of virtue that Monsanto practices on a daily basis. It is these things, I think you ll agree, that make Monsanto a despicable corporate entity and a threat to all humankind.Corporate greed over service to humanityMonsanto s actions are designed to maximize its corporate profits, not to serve the people. Its entire seed-and-herbicide business model is designed to trap farmers in a system of economic dependence to turn farmers into indentured servants who can never return to traditional farming after their soil has been destroyed with Roundup.Death over lifeMonsanto s products cause death. They compromise and violate life. Monsanto s GM corn grown a toxic chemical right inside each and every corn kernel. This corn is what is subsequently eaten by humans.Rats fed this corn grew horrifying cancer tumors as shown here:In a recent scientific study, a shocking 70 percent of female rats died prematurely when fed GMOs. Fifty percent of males died early. Almost all of them died from cancer tumors.Read more about the link between GMOs and cancer tumors at:http://www.naturalnews.com/037249_GMO_study_cancer_tumors_organ_damage.htmlSecrecy over transparencyMonsanto is spending millions of dollars to try to defeat Proposition 37 in California a bill which would simply require GMOs to be indicated on food labels.But Monsanto and other companies such as those that own Larabar, Silk and Kashi do not want consumers to know the truth about GMOs in the foods they buy. (See the GMO boycott infographic here.) They re also spending huge sums of money to try to defeat Proposition 37 so that the food companies can keep GMOs a dirty little secret about the poison in your food.Plainly stated, these companies do not want you to know what you re eating. And why? Because you re eating poison!Domination of technology rather than sharing of wisdomMonsanto does not create technology and then share wisdom with farmers; instead the company patents its GE seeds and thereby claims monopolistic ownership over them. This patent is used to punish farmers!When Monsanto s GMO seeds blow into the fields of farmers who are trying to avoid growing GMOs, Monsanto uses its patent rights to sue the farmers and claim they stole Monsanto property!This is an example of the kind of pure evil Monsanto engages in on a regular basis. From the top company executives to the bottom of the corporate ladder, people who work for Monsanto are engaged in promoting a sickening, unprecedented evil that s spreading across our planet like a black slimy cancer tumor.That s no coincidence, either, considering that eating GMOs causes massive cancer tumors.Artificial manipulation of nature rather than honoring of natureInstead of working with the beauty, the genius and the abundance that has already been engineered into nature, Monsanto seeks to violate nature, overriding healthy plant genes with poison genes that generate insecticides right inside the crops.Instead of honoring the natural ability of seeds to reproduce generation after generation, Monsanto develops terminator seed technology that causes seeds to self-terminate after one generation. This, by itself, is a heinous crime against nature, humankind and planet Earth. It is a crime worse than the Nazi holocaust, for terminator seeds threaten ALL human life on our planet billions of lives are threatened by the behavior of Monsanto.Environmental destruction over environmental stewardshipRoundup herbicide devastates soils, rendering them contaminated and unable to produce healthy crops using traditional (or organic) farming methods. Once a farm plot is destroyed with Roundup, that farmer is forever enslaved to a chemical-based farming protocol. It s unhealthy, it s a disaster to the environment, and the actual crop yields are LOWER than with organic farming, over a period of five years or more.By encouraging farmers to spray literally millions of acres of farmland with Roundup, Monsanto is engaged in a conspiracy to destroy our agricultural heritage and turn us all into food slaves that must pay tribute to Monsatan.Scientific deception over scientific truthThe so-called science coming out of Monsanto is some of the most inane, malicious and brutally deceptive junk science ever fabricated by corporate science sellouts. Instead of testing GMOs for long durations on animals, Monsanto-funded scientists test GMOs for a mere 90 days and then adamantly declare the food to be safe for a lifetime of consumption by humans.It s no wonder they didn t run long-term tests: The real acceleration in cancer tumors only emerged after the 90-day milestone in rats.Even if Monsanto-funded scientists found GMOs to be safe in a lifetime feeding study, you couldn t trust those results anyway: Any scientist, politician or media group with financial ties to Monsanto must now be assumed to be compromised and lacking any credibility whatsoever. Monsanto has bought off countless scientists, experts, media writers and politicians. But paying them off doesn t alter reality. Poison in the corn is still poison in the corn, even if you pay a group of sellout scientists to foolishly declare otherwise.The CHANGE we really need: Corporations with virtueSomething is terribly, terribly wrong with corporate behavior in America, and Monsanto is just one of thousands of corporations which demonstrate highly irresponsible, extreme, destructive behavior.The very design of corporations is missing something: HUMANITY. Sure, corporations are great at generating profits, streamlining logistics, manufacturing, marketing and so on. But where s the humanity in all that?It s nowhere to be found. Corporations don t care WHO they harm, WHAT they destroy, HOW they behavior or even HOW FAR they have to go to make another buck.Here at NaturalNews.com, we ve documented corporations engaging in the most despicable, anti-human behavior imaginable, including using little children as vaccine guinea pigs, secretly testing diseases on prisoners, routinely falsifying evidence, bribing physicians, lying to regulators, engaging in efforts to deny consumers access to more affordable products, inventing fictitious diseases ( disease mongering ) to market toxic drugs, and even hiring P.R. firms to spread lies and disinformation online through social networks and websites.And that s just the pharmaceutical industry. Think about the evils perpetrated by the agricultural giants, weapons manufacturers and globalist banks. There is no end to their destruction.A corporation is like a cancer tumor. It wants to tap into more and more resources, growing larger and larger until it kills everything. That s the innate drive of nearly every large corporation you ve ever heard of: Get big, destroy the competition and DOMINATE! Even if it means killing our future.When corporations become so powerful that they practically run the government as they do now the correct descriptive term for that arrangement is Fascism.How do you stop Fascism? With a revolution, of course. And a peaceful one would be far preferable.The revolution we need is a revolution against the corporationAs we see our present-day society being utterly destroyed by corporations banking, agriculture, pharmaceutical, etc. we must get serious about what needs to happen to change the structure of corporations so that they serve humanity rather than destroying humanity.Here are some suggestions worth considering:#1) Strip away corporate personhood protections.#2) Deny all patents on seeds, genes and medicines. Such things should belong to everyone, not to a monopolistic few. This would also take the profit out of medicine, meaning drug companies would no longer have a financial incentive to fabricate and promote fictitious diseases.#3) Ban all corporate lobbying and campaign contributions. No corporation should have access to lawmakers, period. Lawmakers should serve the people who elected them and no one else.#4) Disband all corporations that currently function as a danger to humanity. This would include, of course, Monsanto, Merck and many others. Who decides this? Whoever wins the revolution, of course. (Isn t that always the case?)#5) Nationalize the Federal Reserve and make it America s bank so that Fed money is owned by the People and benefits the People instead of globalist banks.#6) Halt the revolving door where government regulators take high-paying jobs at the very corporations they ve been regulating. Once a person works in an influential position for a government regulator, they should be forever restricted from working for the industry they once regulated.#7) End Free Speech rights for corporations. Corporations are not people. They have no God-given rights. By ending this fabricated right, we could institute strict advertising limits that would prevent corporations from advertising harmful products to children and adults.Stop supporting evilThe ultimate solution, of course, is a consumer solution: Stop purchasing products from evil corporations! This means you need to stop buying non-organic corn products such as breakfast cereals, corn tortillas, and corn snack chips.Stop buying lawn pesticide chemicals. Stop buying medications. Stop buying toxic perfumes, cosmetics and personal care products. Stop buying soda pop and aspartame!YOU help shift the world in a more positive direction by shifting your own personal purchasing habits. And that s something you can control right now, today, starting with the very next dollar you spend at the store.BUY ORGANIC, non-GMO products wherever possible. You ll be changing the world one purchase at a time. That s a genuine, practical way to diminish the power of evil corporations starting right now. http://www.naturalnews.com/037289_Monsanto_corporations_ethics.htmlRealization #6) Governments are literally trying to kill their own people. It is widely known in the inner circles of power that GMOs are deadly, but governments keep pushing them anyway. As Jeffrey Smith explains in his interview with Democracy Now: ...the person who was in charge of FDA policy in 1992, Monsanto s former attorney, Michael Taylor, he allowed GMOs on the market without any safety studies and without labeling, and the policy claimed that the agency was not aware of any information showing that GMOs were significantly different. Seven years later, because of a lawsuit, 44,000 secret internal FDA memos revealed that that policy was a lie. Not only were the scientists at the FDA aware that GMOs were different, they had warned repeatedly that they might create allergies, toxins, new diseases and nutritional problems. But they were ignored, and their warnings were even denied, and the policy went forth allowing the deployment GMOs into the food supply with virtually no safety studies. http://www.naturalnews.com/030828_GMOs_Wikileaks.htmlMONSANTO S HARVEST OF FEARMonsanto already dominates America s food chain with its genetically modified seeds. Now it has targeted milk production. Just as frightening as the corporation s tactics ruthless legal battles against small farmers is its decades-long history of toxic contamination.by Donald L. Barlett and James B. SteeleThe Control of NatureFor centuries millennia farmers have saved seeds from season to season: they planted in the spring, harvested in the fall, then reclaimed and cleaned the seeds over the winter for re-planting the next spring. Monsanto has turned this ancient practice on its head.Monsanto developed G.M. seeds that would resist its own herbicide, Roundup, offering farmers a convenient way to spray fields with weed killer without affecting crops. Monsanto then patented the seeds. For nearly all of its history the United States Patent and Trademark Office had refused to grant patents on seeds, viewing them as life-forms with too many variables to be patented. It s not like describing a widget, says Joseph Mendelson III, the legal director of the Center for Food Safety, which has tracked Monsanto s activities in rural America for years.Indeed not. But in 1980 the U.S. Supreme Court, in a five-to-four decision, turned seeds into widgets, laying the groundwork for a handful of corporations to begin taking control of the world s food supply. In its decision, the court extended patent law to cover a live human-made microorganism. In this case, the organism wasn t even a seed. Rather, it was a Pseudomonas bacterium developed by a General Electric scientist to clean up oil spills. But the precedent was set, and Monsanto took advantage of it. Since the 1980s, Monsanto has become the world leader in genetic modification of seeds and has won 674 biotechnology patents, more than any other company, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture data.Farmers who buy Monsanto s patented Roundup Ready seeds are required to sign an agreement promising not to save the seed produced after each harvest for re-planting, or to sell the seed to other farmers. This means that farmers must buy new seed every year. Those increased sales, coupled with ballooning sales of its Roundup weed killer, have been a bonanza for Monsanto. http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/05/monsanto200805?currentPage=1AGENT ORANGE DEFOLIANT USED IN VIET NAM Agent Orange, made by the Monsanto Corporation and Dow Chemical, was one of the herbicides and defoliants used by the U.S. military as part of its herbicidal warfare program during the Vietnam War from 1961 to 1971. Dioxin, the toxic compound in Agent Orange, has been shown to cause cancer, birth defects and organ dysfunction.Vietnam estimates 400,000 people were killed or maimed, and 500,000 children born with birth defects as a result of its use. The Red Cross of Vietnam estimates that up to 1 million people are disabled or have health problems due to Agent Orange. (Source)Unfortunately, when you spray toxic chemicals, it s not something that goes away anytime soon. 40 years later, children in southeast Asia are still being born with birth defects from Agent Orange.Children in the areas where Agent Orange was used have been affected and have multiple health problems, including cleft palate, mental disabilities, hernias, and extra fingers and toes. In the 1970s, high levels of dioxin were found in the breast milk of South Vietnamese women, and in the blood of U.S. soldiers who had served in Vietnam. (Source)Monsanto s Agent Orange Still Poisoning Children in Vietnamhttp://www.cheeseslave.com/monsantos-agent-orange-still-poisoning-children-in-vietnam/Monsanto is Killing off the World s Bee Population to Make Way for Their Genetically Modified FrankenBeeshttp://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/2013/02/zionist-monsanto-is-killing-off.html#links*Blamed for Bee Collapse, Monsanto Buys Leading Bee Research FirmRead more here: http://naturalsociety.com/monsanto-bee-collapse-buys-bee-research-firm/*Monsanto buys leading bee research firm after being implicated in bee colony collapseRead more here: http://www.naturalnews.com/035688_Monsanto_honey_bees_colony_collapse.html*Monsanto Genetically Engineering BeesRead more here: http://dreamingabeautifulworld.blogspot.com/2012/04/monsanto-genetically-engineering-bees.htmlWhat Can You do to Help the Honeybees?If you want to learn more about bees and CCD, I highly recommend watching the documentary film Vanishing of the Bees. The film recommends four actions you can take to help preserve honeybees everywhere: Support organic farmers and shop at local farmer s markets as often as possible. You can vote with your fork three times a day. [When you buy organic, you are making a statement by saying no to genetically engineered foods] Cut the use of toxic chemicals in your house and on your lawn, and use organic pest control. Better yet, get rid of your lawn altogether and plant a garden. Lawns offer very little benefit for the environment. Both flower and vegetable gardens provide good honey bee habitats. Become an amateur beekeeper. Having a hive in your garden requires only about an hour of your time per week, benefits your local ecosystem, and you can enjoy your own honey!If you are interested in more information about bee preservation, the following organizations are a good place to start. Pesticide Action Network Bee Campaignv The Foundation for the Preservation of Honey Beesvi American Beekeeping Federationvii Help the Honey BeesviiiKeep Fighting for Labeling of Genetically Engineered FoodsWhile California Prop. 37 failed to pass last November, by a very narrow margin, the fight for GMO labeling is far from over. The field-of-play has now moved to the state of Washington, where the people s initiative 522, The People s Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act, will require food sold in retail outlets to be labeled if it contains genetically engineered ingredients. As stated on LabelitWA.org: Calorie and nutritional information were not always required on food labels. But since 1990 it has been required and most consumers use this information every day. Country-of-origin labeling wasn t required until 2002. The trans fat content of foods didn t have to be labeled until 2006.Now, all of these labeling requirements are accepted as important for consumers. The Food and DrugAdministration (FDA) also says we must know with labeling if our orange juice is from fresh oranges or frozen concentrate.Doesn t it make sense that genetically engineered foods containing experimental viral, bacterial, insect, plant or animal genes should be labeled, too? Genetically engineered foods do not have to be tested for safety before entering the market. No long-term human feeding studies have been done. The research we have is raising serious questions about the impact to human health and the environment.I-522 provides the transparency people deserve. I-522 will not raise costs to consumers or food producers. It simply would add more information to food labels, which manufacturers change routinely anyway, all the time. I-522 does not impose any significant cost on our state. It does not require the state to conduct label surveillance, or to initiate or pursue enforcement. The state may choose to do so, as a policy choice, but I-522 was written to avoid raising costs to the state or consumers. Remember, as with CA Prop. 37, they need support of people like YOU to succeed. Prop. 37 failed with a very narrow margin simply because we didn t have the funds to counter the massive ad campaigns created by the No on 37 camp, led by Monsanto and other major food companies. Let s not allow Monsanto and its allies to confuse and mislead the people of Washington and Vermont as they did in California. So please, I urge you to get involved and help in any way you can, regardless of what state you live in. No matter where you live in the United States, please donate money to these labeling efforts through the Organic Consumers Fund. If you live in Washington State, please sign the I-522 petition. You can also volunteer to help gather signatures across the state. For timely updates on issues relating to these and other labeling initiatives, please join theOrganic Consumers Association on Facebook, or follow them on Twitter. Talk to organic producers and stores and ask them to actively support the Washington initiative. clifylqhttp://www.clifylq.comhttp://clifylq.blogspot.com/http://clifylq.livejournal.com/http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/MONSANTO S ZIONIST BEDFELLOWSThe Senate rammed through the S-510 Food Safety Bill while Americans were sleeping as a rider to the Cash for Clunkers Bill.Obeying their corporate master, Monsanto Corporation, Capitol Hill s new Food Bill has all the earmarks of being written by Monsanto s former Vice President, Michael Taylor.Taylor is now the FDA s Commissioner for Foods where he is supervising the coming torrent of Monsanto s genetically modified foods (GMO s) into the American marketplace.Taylor is guided by his overseers, Zionist Jews Dr Margaret Hamburg and Dr Joshua Sharfstein who head the FDA s governing department, the Office of Commissioners.Hamburg, known as a bioterrorism expert, contributed to the creation of the Senate Committee for Homeland Security led by her Jewish colleague, Talmudic Jew, Senator Joseph Lieberman.And Sharfstein, former adviser to Jewish Senator Henry Waxman, is currently overseeing efforts to prevent labeling of Monsanto s toxic GMO foods since they are currently recognized by the FDA as GRAS, that is, Generally Recognized As Safe which means it only kills 50% of the rats!Now, the revolving door between public officials such as Michael Taylor of the FDA and Monsanto is alarming.For example, a Dr. Michael A. Friedman, a Jew, was a Commissioner of the FDA before he was hired as senior Vice President of Monsanto.But there s a global component to the Food Bill which is part of the Judaic World Order.Louis Dreyfus International, a Jewish multi-national agricultural firm, with offices throughout America and across the globe, now exports Monsanto s GMO seeds into Europe as a prelude to the coming flood of Monsanto s toxic seeds into the American market place.This Zionist global food beast will soon include Lieberman s Homeland Security with the creation of a global food-safety standard as dictated by the S-510 Food Bill.This is in addition to the Food Bill granting Homeland Security the right to police and shut down small farmers if they dare to use heirloom-seeds rather than buying Monsanto s GMO toxic seeds.The authority over buying and selling the foods we eat will now be in the hands of Talmudic Jew, Joseph Lieberman and his Zionist global colleagues. And that s scary.Well, I don t know about you, but I m going to start growing my own.And Monsanto and their Zionist Bedfellows can take their Food Bill and shove it!http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1304382/pg1 Current Mood: Angry (Comment on this)Sunday, February 3rd, 20131:00 pmTHE WAR GOES ON AGAINST WOMEN ONE EXAMPLE...MAMMOGRAMS CAUSE CANCER THERMOGRAPHY IS SAFE .... http://www.whale.to/a/pink_ribbon.htmlDO MAMMOGRAMS CAUSE BREAST CANCER?By Dr. James Howenstine, MD.February 28, 2006NewsWithViews.comNobel laureate, Dr. John Gofman, believed that 50% of cancer was caused by unnecessary radiation primarily related to diagnostic xray studies. Large population studies in Denmark and Canada have revealed that the death rates from breast cancer in women taking regular mammograms and women who have never had mammograms are identical. This probably can be explained by the observation that when a mammogram is positive for a breast cancer the tumor has been present for up to 8 or 10 years. This long delay before a tumor becomes visible in a mammogram allows ample time for the cancer to have spread by lymphatic and vascular channels.An additional problem with mammograms is that approximately 10% of women who do have breast cancer will have normal mammograms. The false sense of security provided by normal mammography in these women obviously delays the diagnosis of breast cancer even more.If this information is valid why are women still having mammograms? Mammography simply joins the long list of therapies and procedures where desire for profits and lowering of world population levels have superceded the welfare of our citizens; Flouridation Of Water. Flouride is a very toxic byproduct of the manufacturing of aluminum. It does not prevent and may actually increase the incidence of tooth decay. Genetically Modified Foods. These dangerous foods have never been studied for safety as they are unnatural and surely cause disease (immune system dysfunction, cancer, allergies etc.). They are not labeled so you are eating them without any ability to protect your health. Wheat - 80% GMO, Corn - 65% GMO, Soy - 80% GMO, etc. Dr. W. Lee Cowden reports that nearly every person with a chronic illness is allergic to soy.[1] Massive Vaccination Programs For Children. The escalating rates of autism, autoimmune illnesses and cancer appear to be at least partially related to mandated vaccines which supply immature immune systems with toxic serum and adjuvants (mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, foreign cell proteins, infectious organisms). Religious beliefs may allow your children to escape the 35 mandatory vaccines. Vaccines represent a lucrative no risk source of profits as Congress has exempted vaccine manufacturers from liability in the event of adverse reactions which are common. Deaths Caused By Pharmaceutical Drugs. More than 125,000 persons die annually in the U.S. from adverse reactions to correctly prescribed medicines. Chemotherapy For Malignancies. The survival rates for chemotherapy are not improving after many years of use. These drugs are quite toxic and result in death if not stopped at an appropriate time. Effective alternative therapies for cancer have been suppressed or vilified for more than 100 years (Coley’s toxins, Rife’s electronic invention, Koch’s substances, Essiac tea, antineoplaston, etc.) Mandatory Phosphorus, Potassium, Nitrogen Fertilizer. Requiring U.S. farmers to use NPP fertilizer guaranteed poor health. The critical nutrient sulfur and trace minerals are lacking in this fertilizer. Lack of trace minerals impairs enzyme function. Advocacy Of Dangerous Dietary Programs And Unwillingness To Remove Dangerous Food Substances. Recommended general diets ignore the danger of sugar excess to pacify the sugar cartel. Hospital heart diets often include the very transfats that cause arteriosclerosis. These synthetic transfats have never been exposed for the health menaces they are. Monosodium glutamate, chlorine containing sugar substitutes and Aspartame (Nutrasweet) have been largely ignored by health agencies established to protect public health. Codex Alimentaris. This diabolic creation of the pharmaceutical industry will possibly soon convert all vitamins, minerals, aminoacids and nutritional supplements into drugs requiring a physician’s prescription to permit you to pay 10 times more for the ability to continue to take these substances. This is operational in Norway and Germany and all these basic health substances cost 10 times more than in the days prior to Codex. Aluminum Is Everywhere In Our Society (water treatment facilities use alum, foil, deodorants, antacids, cooking utensils, baking compounds) There is considerable evidence that aluminum plays a significant role in causing Alzheimer’s Disease along with mercury. Mercury Contamination. Dental amalgams, fish, vaccines, fluorescent light bulbs, coal power plants, sewage treatment, hospital waste disposal, crematoriums, plastic casings, batteries, paint, shoe light bulbs and thermostats all provide mercury that can reach human beings. The ADA denies amalgams are a health risk yet a broken thermometer bulb requires a detailed cleansing protocol. Mercury is the only metal that easily vaporizes making inhalation a big problem.The Health Benefits Of Soy Foods Have Been Heavily AdvertisedThe truth is that the high estrogen content of soy foods is clearly carcinogenic[2] –especially likely to cause breast cancer. Too much estrogen causes excessive growth of tissue and the breast readily responds to this estrogenic stimulation.Soy foods cause premature puberty in young girls and delayed sexual maturation in boys .Infant girls fed soy formula have phytoestrogen levels 20 times higher than normal for girls fed breast milk. These girls may proceed to begin menstruation and breast development by age 7. Boys fed soy have delay in onset of normal puberty with a smaller than normal penis and a greater tendency to homosexuality.[3]Soybean protein is inexpensive and has spread all over the world. All Western soy foods are currently more than 80% contaminated by genetically modified soy beans and this is almost certainly a bad feature (GMO soybean manufacturers have not released the results of their health studies on these foods as these results could have damaged the market for GMO foods). Unbiased experts are certain these GMO foods will cause cancer, allergies and immune dysfunction as these GMO foods are foreign to the human body. Most soy foods contain isoflavones which are potent estrogens. Soy foods will aggravate our estrogen excess that we receive from petrochemicals, plastics, hormone implatation in animals and cosmetics (xenoestrogens).. Symptoms related to estrogen will thus be worstened in women and males will have greater difficulty warding off impotence and decreased fertility.The U.S. food with the fastest increasing incidence of allergic reactions is soybeans. This is very likely due to the body’s inability to metabolize this foreign synthetic GMO soybean protein.Tofu is reported to contribute to accelerated[4] brain aging resulting in dementiaAlso it is not a comfort to me to know that we are eating a small amount of Roundup herbicide every time we eat U. S. soybeans as Monsanto’s Roundup tolerant GMO soybeans[5] are widely grown. Previous to this new GMO product, soybeans promptly died when sprayed with Roundup. Eating Roundup herbicide can not be good for human beings.Soy milk causes significant elevation in lipoprotein (a) levels. This undesirable effect was discovered at Loma Linda.[6] All soy products particularly the milk damage the thyroid gland and impair the body’s hormone balance.Common soy foods contain sufficient oxalate to contribute to the forming of kidney stones. The absorption of minerals is impeded by phytates in soybeans.Soybeans must undergo chemical processing before they become edible. This processing includes acid baths, extreme heat, and spray drying. To improve the taste artificial flavorings such as MSG, preservatives, sweeteners, emulsifiers and synthetic nutrients are added. This processing makes soybeans a very artificial food. The best way to avoid soy is to carefully read labels (watch out for textured protein, vegetable protein etc.)The Breast Cancer Epidemic Is Steadily Getting Worse.Massive campaigns exist to encourage women to have annual mammograms. More breast tissue is thus exposed to dangerous cancer causing radiation each year. This yearly ritual generates false positive and false negative results leading to many worthless operations and considerable anxiety in women incorrectly diagnosed. Needle biopsies are often done to evaluate breast masses. This procedure occasionally spreads small foci of tumor along the needle track potentially increasing the spread of tumor cells. Mammograms have had more than adequate time to prove their worth and they have failed miserably.Breast cancer is a huge growth industry (more than 6.6 billion dollars[7] annually). This industry supports radiologists, xray technicians, surgeons, nurses, manufacturers of xray equipment, hospitals etc. and will not be allowed to disappear by curing and preventing breast cancer.A few years ago only 12% of U.S. women could expect to develop breast cancer. . Now with more years of mammography, transfats, increased estrogenic environmental contamination and continued consumption of soy products the rate of breast cancer has increased to perhaps one out of every 8 or 9 women. When will women rise up and say we have had enough of the possibly deliberate mis-management of our problem. Women must take charge of their own health and ignore self serving directives to come in for your annual mammogram. What should be done?Thermography Can Diagnose Early Breast CancerDigital infrared thermography detects changes in blood flow in response to cold air blown over the breasts. The blood vessels supplying a cancer are generated by the cancer and are thus not controlled by the autonomic nervous system. This means that blood continues to flow to the malignancy when all other parts of the breast are receiving less blood because of the cold air. producing vasoconstriction. The blood flowing to the cancer shows up as a hot spot on the heat detecting screen with increased blood flow at the site of the tumor. A benign condition like a fibrocystic breast mass retains the normal blood supply controlled by the autonomic nervous system so the cold air causes diffuse decreases in blood flow in a uniform fashion. The thermogram enables breast tumors to be diagnosed when they are tiny and just getting started.Therapy with immune supporting substances like Del Immune V, organic food, life style changes (exercise, no smoking, drugs or alcohol etc.) multivitamins, minerals and nutrients permit the tumor to resolve and disappear without the necessity for biopsy.Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!Enter Your E-Mail Address:Thermography is safe and gives at least a 2 to 3 year earlier diagnosis of breast cancer than can be made with mammograms. Fewer mammograms will lead to less radiation of breast tissue and is likely to slow the steady increase in breast cancer. Put pressure on your health plan to pay for thermograms!!!Footnotes:1, Cowden, W. Lee personal communication2, Douglass, Wlliam Campbell Real Health Breakthroughs pg. 1Vol5 Number 9Februaru 20063, ibid pg 14, J Am Coll Nutr 129:758-767 19995, Health Sciences Institute e-Alert June 24, 2003 page 1-3.6, Loma Linda Center for chronic degenarative disease report 20017, Sellman, Sherrill Synthetic hormones put millions of women at risk for cancer and other deadly diseases. Crusader August/September 2005 pg 6.http://www.newswithviews.com/Howenstine/james42.htm© 2006 Dr. James Howenstine - All Rights Reserved clifylqhttp://www.clifylq.com/YES LADIES THE MAMMOGRAMS YOU USE ONCE A YEAR TO CHECK FOR BREAST CANCER IS KNOWN TO ACTUALLY CAUSE THE CANCER YOU WANT TO CHECK FOR. BUT THE SICK TRUTH IS THAT THE DOCTORS PRESCRIBING IT KNOWS THIS BUT STILL BURNS YOUR BREAST WITH CANCER CAUSING RADIATION WHEN THEY COULD USE THERMOGRAM CHECKS REPLETE OF RADIATION. INSTEAD IT USES DIGITAL INFRARED. DID YOU KNOW THIS FACT? HOW MANY MAMMOGRAMS HAVE YOU HAD THUS FAR LADIES? DOES THIS PISS YOU OFF?? GO TO MY WEB SITE TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT HERE: http://cliffs3-daywalk.com/ Current Mood: ANGRY (Comment on this)Saturday, February 2nd, 20139:46 amNEW WORLD ORDER EXTERMINATION PLANS FOR MINORITY WOMEN ESPECIALLY LATINOS AND BLACKS ....................http://www.clifylq.com/REPORT PROVES PLANNED PARENTHOOD TARGETS BLACKS, HISPANICSby Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 8/29/11 11:23 AMA new reported issued by the pro-life group Life Dynamics proves that Planned Parenthood and the abortion industry in the United States target black and Hispanic Americans by placing abortion facilities in communities with high minority populations. http://lifenews.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/LifeDynamicsRacialReport.pdfTitled, Racial Targeting and Population Control, the new report validates the claims pro-life advocates have made for years and that Life Dynamics made in its groundbreaking Maafa21 video released two years ago showing that abortion advocates have purposefully placed abortion centers in urban areas with high percentages of black and Hispanic residents.Mark Crutcher and Carole Novielli conducted the research in the 24-page report and they say the location of abortion centers is the modern equivalent of the population control policies against minorities, especially African-Americans, that Planned Parenthood has supported since Margaret Sanger founded it. The researchers say they prepared the new report to respond to the criticism of the claims abortion advocates have made to the racial charges and to point out a hypocrisy. The initial response to this documentary from people defending these organizations was to claim that they focus their facilities on minority neighborhoods because that is where the need is, they write. Almost immediately, however, they saw that this argument was creating a problem for them. Simply put, it is incompatible with one of their other arguments. Abortion advocates have always claimed that their main goal is to reduce unintended pregnancies and, by placing abortion centers and Planned Parenthood clinics in minority communities, abortion backers claimed their focus wasn t promoting abortions to blacks and Hispanics but to help them reduce the number of unplanned pregnancies by promoting birth control and contraception. If that is true, in light of their concession that they have focused these things on the minority community, the obvious result should be that black women have the lowest pregnancy and abortion rates in the country, they researchers write. Yet, a new study released by the pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute, a former Planned Parenthood research affiliate, shows birth control and contraception are not reducing abortions and unplanned pregnancies, especially in lower income minority areas. http://www.lifenews.com/2011/08/25/study-birth-control-not-stopping-unplanned-pregnancies-abortions/ But to the contrary, in contemporary America, the rate of pregnancy among black women is almost three times as high as it is for white women and, though they make up less than 13% of the female population, black women have about 37% of the abortions, the researchers write.With that statistic in mind, the researchers set forth with the goal of mapping every abortion facility and Planned Parenthood center in the nation against population and racial demographic data sorted by zip code. They wanted to determine not only whether abortion centers were located in zip codes with high black and Hispanic populations but whether the black and Hispanic populations in the zip codes where abortion businesses were located exceeded the total percentage of the population of the particular state as a whole in terms of its minority population. We began by creating a database of the ZIP codes for every Planned Parenthood facility in the United States. This list was generated from Planned Parenthood s website. We then used United States Census Bureau figures to establish the percentage of black and Hispanic people residing within each of these ZIP codes as well as within each state, they write. In reviewing this data, there are several things to keep in mind. The first is that the issue is not whether a ZIP code is predominately black or Hispanic but whether it is disproportionately black or Hispanic. The results were startling.In Texas alone, 94 zip codes show either an abortion facility or a Planned parenthood abortion-referral clinic located there and 72 percent of the zip codes have populations that are disproportionately black and/or Hispanic.The report also found multiple abortion centers in many super-minority populated areas. The New Jersey zip code 07631 has a black population 286.7% of the state s overall percentage and a Hispanic population 163.9% of the state, they noted, and it has four abortion or abortion-referral centers. Minnesota zip code 55404 has a black population that is 797.1% of the overall state percentage and a Hispanic population 537.9% of the state and there are three abortion or abortion-referral clinics there.The racial targeting is not limited to certain regions of the country. In Connecticut a state thoroughly dissimilar from Texas in size, culture and geography there are 21 zip codes where abortion centers or Planned Parenthood abortion-referral clinics are located and 15 of them have disproportionately black and/or Hispanic populations. Again, this pattern is repeated in state after state, the researchers noted. We identified 116 ZIP codes with more than one [abortion or abortion-referral facility]. Of those, 84 were disproportionately black and/or Hispanic. What this means is that, when the American family planning industry places multiple facilities in a ZIP code, that ZIP code is more than two-and-a-half times as likely to be disproportionately minority as not. What we now know and have documented is that there is not one state in the union without [abortion] centers located in ZIP codes with higher percentages of blacks and/or Hispanics than the state s overall percentage. In fact, Hawaii is the only state that does not have facilities located in ZIP codes exceeding 125% of their overall percentage, they write. Not only is this racial targeting widespread, it s scale is often enormous. We found 42 states with family planning facilities in ZIP codes where the black and/or Hispanic populations exceeds 200% of the state s overall percentage. More telling is that these percentages routinely go far beyond even this level. Numerous states have facilities in ZIP codes that range from 250% to well over 1,000% and it is not uncommon for them to have facilities located in many such ZIP codes. In the end, this data speaks for itself and does not require a lot of analysis. The numbers make it clear that the African-American and Hispanic communities have been targeted and logic makes it clear that this did not happen coincidentally or unintentionally, they concluded. http://www.lifenews.com/2011/08/29/report-proves-planned-parenthood-targets-blacks-hispanics/PLANNED PARENTHOOD TARGETS MINORITY WOMEN79% of Planned Parenthood s surgical abortion facilities are located within walking distance of African American and/or Hispanic/Latino communities.http://www.protectingblacklife.org/pp_targets/index.htmlTHE TRUTH ABOUT MAGARET SANGER!Planned Parenthood is the largest abortion provider in America. 78% of their clinics are in minority communities. Blacks make up 12% of the population, but 35% of the abortions in America. Are we being targeted? Isn t that genocide? We are the only minority in America that is on the decline in population. If the current trend continues, by 2038 the black vote will be insignificant. Did you know that the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, was a devout racist who created the Negro Project designed to sterilize unknowing black women and others she deemed as undesirables of society? The founder of Planned Parenthood said, Colored people are like human weeds and are to be exterminated. Is her vision being fulfilled today? http://www.blackgenocide.org/planned.htmlHOW PLANNED PARENTHOOD DUPED AMERICAAt a March 1925 international birth control gathering in New York City, a speaker warned of the menace posed by the black and yellow peril. The man was not a Nazi or Klansman; he was Dr. S. Adolphus Knopf, a member of Margaret Sanger s American Birth Control League (ABCL), which along with other groups eventually became known as Planned Parenthood.Sanger s other colleagues included avowed and sophisticated racists. One, Lothrop Stoddard, was a Harvard graduate and the author of The Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy. Stoddard was something of a Nazi enthusiast who described the eugenic practices of the Third Reich as scientific and humanitarian. And Dr. Harry Laughlin, another Sanger associate and board member for her group, spoke of purifying America s human breeding stock and purging America s bad strains. These strains included the shiftless, ignorant, and worthless class of antisocial whites of the South. Not to be outdone by her followers, Margaret Sanger spoke of sterilizing those she designated as unfit, a plan she said would be the salvation of American civilization.: And she also spike of those who were irresponsible and reckless, among whom she included those whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers. She further contended that there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped. That many Americans of African origin constituted a segment of Sanger considered unfit cannot be easily refuted.http://www.jesusissavior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Abortion%20is%20Murder/truth_about_margaret_sanger.htmMARGARET SANGER S NATION OF MORONShttp://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Abortion%20is%20Murder/margaret_sanger.htmTHE NEGRO PROJECT:Margaret Sanger s EUGENICS Plan For Black AmericansBy Tanya L. Green I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing therefore choose life, that both you and your descendants may live. --Deuteronomy 30:19 (NKJVOn the crisp, sunny, fall Columbus Day in 1999, organizers of the Say So march approached the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court. The marchers, who were predominantly black pastors and lay persons, concluded their three-day protest at the site of two monumental cases: the school desegregation Brown v. Board of Education (1954) and the pro-abortion Roe v. Wade rights in t he latter converged in the declaration of Rev. Johnny M. Hunter, the march s sponsor and national director of Life, Education and Resource Network (LEARN), the largest black pro-life organization. Civil rights doesn t mean anything without a right to life! declared Hunter. He and the other marchers were protesting the disproportionately high number of abortions in the black community. The high number is no accident. Many Americans black and white are unaware of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger s Negro Project. Sanger created this program in 1939, after the organization changed its name from the American Birth Control League (ABCL) to the Birth Control Federation of America (BCFA).The aim of the program was to restrict many believe exterminate the black population. Under the pretense of better health and family planning, Sanger cleverly implemented her plan. What s more shocking is Sanger s beguilement of black America s cr me de la cr me those prominent, well educated and well-to-do into executing her scheme. Some within the black elite saw birth control as a means to attain economic empowerment, elevate the race and garner the respect of whites.The Negro Project has had lasting repercussions in the black community: We have become victims of genocide by our own hands, cried Hunter at the Say So march.clifylqhttp://www.clifylq.com/qa/LADIES THERE IS A WAR BEING WAGED AGAINST WOMEN ESPECIALLY MINORITY WOMEN! MARCH WITH CLIFYLQ TO PUT A STOP TO IT NOW AND NOT WITH THE ZIO BASTARDS SUCH AS THE SUSAN G. KOMEN TYPE GROUPS WHO ONLY TAKE YOUR MARCH MONEY TO FILL THEIR COFFERS WITH PROFIT AND GIVE THE REST TO PLANNED PARENTHOOD AND TO ABORTION CLINICS THE VERY PLACES THAT CAUSE CANCER! MARCH WITH ME HERE LADIES: http://awakeningofwomen.com/mission-2/ AND LETS STOP THIS EVIL AGAINST THE FEMALES IN THE WORLD WITH ONE VOICE SHOUTING OUT ENOUGH OF YOUR NWO BULLSHIT. STOP ABORTIONS, STOP PLANNED PARENTHOOD AND THOSE WHO RULE OVER US WHO ARE BEHIND THIS EVIL IN OUR OWN GOVERNMENT. YES OBAMA AND OUR ENTIRE EVIL GOVERNMENT ARE BEHIND IT ALL LADIES!!!! Current Mood: angry (Comment on this)Friday, January 11th, 20132:53 amSUSAN G. KOMEN 3-DAY SIGN UP TO SUPPORT MORE BREAST CANCER (OUR CASH COW) FOR YOUR LIFETIME ................. www.clifylq.comTHERE IS A WAR GOING ON AGAINST WOMEN IN AMERICA AND THEY DON T EVEN KNOW ITCLIFYLQ SAYS THAT MARCHING FOR BREAST CANCER TO RAISE MONEY FOR A CURE IS JUST A HUGE WASTE OF TIME. YOUR MARCHES ARE A JOKE TO THE NWO WHO ARE LAUGHING AT YOU ALL THE WAY TO THEIR BANKS.THERE IS NO CURE THROUGH THEM FOR OVER 50 YEARS NOW. EVERYONE DESERVES A LIFE TIME OF PROFITS FROM YOUR LOSS. WAKE UP LADIES! SEEK OUT GOT CLIFYLQ FOR THE TRUTH.EVE SILVER EDUCATES WOMEN ABOUT THE MONEY BEING COLLECTED BY SUSAN G. KOMEN AND GIVEN TO PLANNED PARENTHOOD.MONEY THAT EVE HAS BRANDED, PINK MONEY .http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/abc.htmlMaking informed choices is the mission of Karen Malec s organization. As the president and co-founder of The Coalition on Abortion and Breast Cancer, she speaks out against the funding being given to Planned Parenthood by the Susan G. Komen foundation. Malec says records show during 2007 the Susan G. Komen Foundation gave 700 thousand dollars of funding to Planned Parenthood. Women deserve to know their risks, Malec says, and abortion should be on the list of breast cancer risks.All three women ask the question: Why fund a breast cancer organization that is providing services to women which will increase their risk of breast cancer? Eve, Karen, and Dr. Lanfranchi classify breast cancer research money, which is in turn given to fund abortion services, as pink money . They urge you to consider where your money is going and how it is impacting generations of women. https://www.facinglife.tv/store/index.aspLADIES,FIND OUT FROM CLIFYLQ S 108 PAGE E-BOOK WHAT IT IS I M SAYING HERE.http://www.clifylq.com/contact-me/I WILL LIST THE INTRODUCTION SECTION OF SAID BOOK THAT WILL HELP YOU TO SEE WHAT IT IS I AM SAYING THE FACT THAT THERE IS A CURE NOW FOR CANCER OUR OWN GOVERNMENT WANTS TO HIDE FROM YOU. TO PROTECT THEIR CANCER CASH COW OF TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS FOR TREATMENTS AND FOR POPULATION CONTROL ESPECIALLY TOWARDS YOU WOMEN!!INTRODUCTIONI am writing this e-book purposely for the WOMEN in America and the world the fact that cancer is curable without what is called orthodox treatments i.e., cutting, burning, and poisoning the patients under their care. I want to expose the fact that cancer is a billion dollar if not a trillion dollar business that is being protected by our own evil government and specifically the evil Food and Drug Administration known as the FDA. These Zio criminals of the NWO in conjunction with the Medical Mafia and Big Pharma I call Farmagedon, have one thing in mind ladies and it ain t curing breast cancer. It s profit!! Cancer is well established in America as a CASH COW for these bastards controlling our government. It is up to every American (and especially every woman) to finally see the evil I have outlined in this e-book,- The Quacks That Cured Cancer. It s time to stop marching for the Zionist controlled and operated Susan G Komen groups who simply put your hard earned march money into their affiliate programs such as Planned Parenthood, and Abortion Clinics. I prove on my web site that both these organizations cause cancer vs. cure it!Ladies you need to completely review my web site at clifylq.com and finally compare the findings on this e-book to see that what I am saying is the ugly truth. Our Zionist/Rothschild/Rockefeller/Federal Reserve Bank government does not care about breast cancer or aids or any of the other diseases we Americans suffer from. That is as far as a cure is concerned but the politics of cancer is,- There is no money or profit in any cure, but trillions for the treatments. I hope to literally PISS each and every woman in this country off to the point of UPROAR and ANGER to stop those who are stopping the cure for cancer from being exposed to us all. Review this e-book to see how other men and women who have already come up with the cure for cancer have been bullied, arrested and shut down from helping any of you ladies suffering from breast cancer. Tell me what s wrong with this picture ladies?? But more importantly, what are you going to do about it now that you know? Will you simply go back to your sick relative and watch them be eaten up with cancer and killed by chemo and given poisonous drugs that cause cancer? Or will you join clifylq and stop this evil being caused by our own evil government?What if I told you cancer is simply the lack of enzymes and nutritional deficiency to one s body! Would you buy that! Such diseases as pellagra or scurvy was once a dreaded disease and many British soldiers on ships died from it. Later it was proven to be a lack of citrus/vitamin C in their diet. Ask yourselves ladies have you or anyone in your family died from scurvy or pellagra? Have you even heard of said diseases? Do you have a shortage of Nitrilosides in your body?The saying,- you are what you eat is very true and especially today when our own evil government is purposely polluting our food, air, and water with all sorts of chemicals. To include the toxic concoctions they pour into vaccines or flu shots to give us and our kids using the BS ruse of preventing the flu.I know it s hard to believe ladies that our own evil government is trying to kill off 80% of the population and especially the women in this world, but it s true! Don t believe me ladies do your own research. Take a good look in the recommended books in the back chapters and click on to the links I provide under resources to find out clifylq is telling the truth and you women in America need to join with me to rise up and fight those who are doing this to us all!!I prove in my www.clifylq.com web site that your marching for the Susan G Komen kinds of groups to raise breast cancer research money is a waste of your time and money. The Komen group just gives your marching dollars to their affiliates at Planned Parenthood and to Abortion Clinics. The very groups that help cause the cancer you want to cure. How sick is that and how stupid does that make you ladies feel that for over 50 years you have been duped like this? To march for breast cancer for a good purpose of helping your loved ones or yourself from the evil of cancer when all along the Komen groups are laughing at you ladies all the way to their Zionist owned and operated banks making them rich and not curing cancer. Using such slogans as,- Everyone Deserves A Lifetime. Which should more accurately read, Everyone Deserves A Lifetime of Paying us your money.Join clifylq and unite with him to finally rise up in ONE FEMALE VOICE that you will STOP the cancer not only in our bodies, but ALSO THE CANCER OVER US in our own government who are behind the cause of cancer and those who are stopping its cure once and for all!!LADIES OF AMERICA UNITE IN ONE VOICE with me WE ARE MAD AS HELL AND WE AIN T GOING TO TAKE IT ANY MORE!! clifylqContact me here:E: clifylq@aol.comP: 760-751-9557Be sure to ask how you can get clifylq s 108 page E-Book titled,-The Quacks Who Cured Cancer and our logos to help us spread the wordhttp://cliffs3-daywalk.com/REMEMBER LADIESADASSAH ZIONISTS JOINS SUSAN G. KOMEN FOR THE CURE BSNEW YORK - November 23, 2009 - Alarmed by the breast cancer epidemic in this country, Hadassah, the Women s Zionist Organization of America is joining Susan G. Komen for the Cure , the world s largest breast cancer organization, and others in addressing the recent news on breast cancer screenings. In addition, Hadassah and Komen for the Cure have pledged to work together to address the global plight of breast cancer. http://ww5.komen.org/KomenNewsArticle.aspx?id=6442451524THE JEWISH ABORTION INDUSTRYJust as this race of people dominates all progressive movements in the West, so do Jews dominate the abortion business. Furthermore, Judaism is pro-abortion-by-default, since Judaism automatically champions a mother s life over her fetus life. Indeed, says Judaism, the fetus is not human until its actual entry into the world. Christianity believes just the opposite. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/29467.htmlThere are roughly 1.3 million legal abortions performed in America each year. Of those abortions, Jewish involvement is heavy -- whether the abortion doctor is Jewish, the owner of the abortion clinic is Jewish or the clinic s pro-abort family counselors are Jewish. http://wsi.matriots.com/abortbiz.html* Numerous liberal Jewish groups openly support and advocate abortion, including the American Jewish Committee, the American Jewish Congress, the National Council of Jewish Women, Hadassah Women, the Federation of Reconstructionist Congregations, the Jewish Labor Committee, the Union of American Hebrew Congregations, B nai B rith Women, Na amat USA, the National Council of Jewish Women, the National Federation of Temple Sisterhood, the New Jewish Agenda, North American Temple Youth, the United Synagogues of America, and the Women s League for Conservative Judaism. Many of these groups were founded for the express purpose of pushing abortion. http://clifylq.livejournal.com/109728.htmlFor more information on the medical connection between abortion and breast cancer please visit ABORTION at this link,-http://www.conservapedia.com/Abortion The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it. Margaret Sanger, Founder of Planned Parenthood.http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/2009/02/rothschild-sanger-kissinger-ford-carter.htmlMARGARET SANGER Started The Zionist Abortion Industry. Planned Parenthood Takes In $700 Million A Year. It s Not About The Question Of Abortion. The legitimacy of abortion is neither here nor there. The problem lies in the fact that it is a Zionist-dominated, taxpayer-funded scam. It s agenda is to make Zionists wealthy, and provide funds for political agendas. http://72.52.208.92/~gbpprorg/judicial-inc/81margaret_sanger_started_the_zion.htmEVERYONE DESERVES A LIFETIME BUT NOT WITH EVIL GROUPS LIKE SUSAN G KOMEN MISLEADING WOMEN TO MARCH FOR THEIR PROFIT ALL THE WAY TO ZIONIST BANKS. GET YOUR COPY OF MY E-BOOK TO SEE HOW OTHER MEN AND WOMEN HAVE ALREADY CURED CANCER WITH PROOF OF ITS CURE. http://cliffs3-daywalk.com/ Current Mood: angry (Comment on this)Sunday, December 16th, 20121:42 pmOBAMA MURDERS 18 KIDS IN NEWTOWN TO GAIN SUPPORT FOR GUN CONTROL IN AMERICA SICK BASTARD ........................................... http://clifylq.livejournal.com/123682.html PHONEY TEARS FROM A MASS MURDERER OF CHILDRENhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2h1QNTQDnoU“meaningful action” regardless of the politics of gun control in AmericaNEWTOWN SCHOOL SHOOTING STORY ALREADY BEING CHANGED BY THE MEDIA TO ELIMINATE EYEWITNESS REPORTS OF A SECOND SHOOTER.December 14th, 2012(NaturalNews) – The national media is ablaze today with coverage of the tragic elementary school shooting in Newtown, CT, where 27 people have reportedly been killed, including 18 children.As always, when violent shootings take place, honest journalists are forced to ask the question: “Does this fit the pattern of other staged shootings?” One of the most important red flags of a staged shooting is a second gunman, indicating the shooting was coordinated and planned. There are often mind control elements at work in many of these shootings. The Aurora “Batman” shooter James Holmes, for example, was a graduate student actually working on mind control technologies funded by the U.S. government. There were also chemical mind control elements linked to Jared Lee Loughner, the shooter of Congresswomen Giffords in Arizon in 2011.When key elements of the story keeps changing, something is fishyJournalists are trained to ask questions, and one of the questions I have right now is: Why was the second gunman suddenly dropped from media coverage after the first few hours of this story developing?And why is there always a second gunman in these recent mass shootings that seem to be engineered to maximize emotional shock value due to the sheer horror of all the innocent deaths?This story is continuing to develop, and we'll keep asking questions here on Natural News. Our hearts and prayers go out to the children and families impacted by this violent tragedy. Given the terrible loss of life that has taken place here, shouldn't we all seek to get to the bottom of WHY these shootings all seem to fit a common pattern of multiple mind-controlled shooters followed by an almost immediate media cover-up of the facts?For the sake of those children who were killed today, I want to get to the bottom of this and expose the REAL story, for the purpose of stopping this violence from targeting yet more innocents in the future. http://www.naturalnews.com/038352_school_shooting_lone_gunman_media_cover-up.htmlLearn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/038352_school_shooting_lone_gunman_media_cover-up.html#ixzz2FKSPP0Lvhttp://www.libertygunrights.com/TreatySet10Pgs.pdfAccording to multiple eyewitness reports from Aurora, Colorado, including at least one caught on camera by mainstream media news reports in Colorado, James Holmes did not operate alone. There was a second shooter involved. But the media quickly eliminated any mention of a second shooter from its coverage, resorting to the typical cover story of a “lone gunman.”COLORADO BATMAN SHOOTING SHOWS OBVIOUS SIGNS OF BEING STAGEDFriday, July 20, 2012by Mike Adams, the Health RangerEditor of NaturalNews.com (NaturalNews) James Holmes, the Aurora, Colorado shooter who reportedly opened fire at a Batman movie premiere, was a medical student at the University of Colorado, pursuing a PhD in neuroscience, reports ABC News. (http://abcnews.go.com/US/mass-shooting-colorado-movie-theater-14-peop...)As part of the attack, Holmes painted his hair red and referred to himself as "The Joker," one of the arch enemies in the DC Comics-inspired Batman movie series. (http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/07/20/police-14-dead-in-colorado-the...)According to news reports, this sudden violent rampage was completely out of character for James Holmes, who was described as "shy."The New York Times is now reporting:Billy Kromka, a pre-med student at the University of Colorado, Boulder, worked with Mr. Holmes for three months last summer as a research assistant in a lab of at the Anschutz Medical Campus. Mr. Kromka said he was surprised to learn Mr. Holmes was the shooting suspect. "It was just shocking, because there was no way I thought he could have the capacity to do commit an atrocity like this," he said. (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/21/us/colorado-mall-shooting.html?page...)"He spent much of his time immersed in the computer, often participating in role-playing online games..."There is already conjecture that James Holmes may have been involved in mind-altering neuroscience research and ended up becoming involved at a depth he never anticipated. His actions clearly show a strange detachment from reality, indicating he was not in his right mind. That can only typically be accomplished through drugs, hypnosis or trauma (and sometimes all three).His behavior doesn't addHis behavior already reveals stark inconsistencies that question the mainstream explanation of events. For example, he opened fire on innocent people but then calmly surrendered to police without resistance. This is not consistent with the idea of "killing everyone."Furthermore, he then admitted to police that his apartment was booby-trapped with explosives. If you were really an evil-minded Joker trying to kill people (including cops), why would you warn them about the booby trap in advance? It doesn't add up."Holmes was taken into custody shortly after the shooting, police said, adding he didn't resist when he was arrested," reports a local CBS news affiliate (http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/07/20/police-14-dead-in-colorado-the...)."After his arrest, Holmes told police about 'possible explosives in his residence,' Oates said. When police searched his apartment, they discovered it was booby-trapped and evacuated surrounding buildings, police said. Oates said bomb technicians are determining how to disarm flammable or explosive material in the third-floor apartment. He said police could be there some time."None of this checks out. If you're a killer bent on causing mayhem, why tell the police about your surprise bomb waiting for them back at your apartment?Holmes was clearly provided with exotic gear (and bomb-making skills)Continuing from CBS:"He said pictures from inside the apartment are fairly disturbing and the devices look to be sophisticated, adding the booby-traps were 'something I've never seen.' One rifle, two handguns, a knife, a bullet proof vest, a ballistic helmet, a gas device, a gas mask, military SWAT clothing and unidentified explosives were also found in Holmes' car, a law enforcement source told CBS News. Oates said Holmes wore a gas mask, a ballistic helmet and vest as well as leg, groin and throat protectors during the shooting."Added on July 22nd: "He allegedly wore a helmet, a throat guard, a ballistic vest, ballistic leggings and gloves and was dressed in black." (http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/explosives-removed-from-james-...)In other words, this guy was equipped with exotic gear by someone with connections to military equipment. SWAT clothing, explosives, complex booby-traps... c'mon, this isn't a "lone gunman." This is somebody who was selected for a mission, given equipment to carry it out, then somehow brainwashed into getting it done."Aurora Police Chief Dan Oates said Holmes' apartment is booby-trapped with a 'sophisticated' maze of flammable devices. It could take hours or days for authorities to disarm it," reports Yahoo News (http://sg.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/suspect-neuroscience-phd-stu...).UPDATE: (This section added to the story Saturday at 2:30 pm central, July 21, 2012). It is now being reported that exotic, advanced booby-traps have been disarmed at the apartment of James Holmes. The Denver affiliate of CBS News is now reporting: (http://denver.cbslocal.com/2012/07/21/officials-expect-explosions-as-...)Officials say they have removed all major threats at the booby-trapped apartment of the Aurora movie theater shooting suspect on Saturday. They have used a robot to go inside James Holmes' apartment. ...They were able to disable a trip wire that was set to go off when the apartment door was opened. "This is some serious stuff that our team is dealing with..."Shortly before noon crews were successful performing a controlled detonation... More controlled detonations were possible....there were multiple trip wires throughout the apartment. Investigators have also seen what appear to be mortars planted in the apartment -- sort of the kind of mortars that might be seen in a commercial fireworks show. Up to a half dozen of them are scattered around....they have seen a number of inflated balloons in the apartment... with many appearing to be filled with a powder. Also linked together are bottles of liquid. ...a strong smell of gasoline emanating from the apartment....several boxes on top of the refrigerator and there are lights flashing on the boxes....30 aerial shells (fireworks) commercially legally available for purchase. ...the suspect may have filled them with smokeless powder. ...entering the apartment would have caused a trip wire to trigger one liquid container to pour/mix with another. When the two mix together, they set off the main charge of the device which may be additional flammable liquids....an enormously dangerous mission. About 100 personnel are on scene.And the BBC is now reporting: (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-18937726)Technicians made a first attempt on Friday to disarm the traps, believed to include explosives, but withdrew when it became clear the property was too dangerous to enter. Sgt Carlson said the device was set up to detonate when the first person entered the flat. "We've defeated first threat. It was set up to kill, and that could have been police officers or anything," she said."In addition to the shells found in the apartment, jars of a kind of accelerant were also found inside the dwelling, said Aurora Police Sgt. Cassidee Carlson." (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000087239639044446430457754103267932...) "Aurora Police Chief Dan Oates expressed frustration on Friday with the web of wires and devices Mr. Holmes had connected inside his apartment, which were hindering the investigation into the shooting. ...It was unlike anything he had seen before."FBI has a track record of staging similar assaults, then stopping them at the last minuteThis is not your run-of-the-mill crime of passion. It was a carefully planned, heavily funded and technically advanced attack. Who might be behind all this? The FBI, of course, which has a long history of setting up and staging similar attacks, then stopping them right before they happen. See four documented stories on these facts:http://www.naturalnews.com/035849_domestic_terror_plots_FBI.htmlhttp://www.naturalnews.com/034325_FBI_entrapment_terror_plots.htmlhttp://www.naturalnews.com/033751_FBI_terrorism.htmlhttp://www.naturalnews.com/035757_FBI_terror_plots_false_flag.htmlAs you soak all this in, remember that the FBI had admitted to setting up terror plots, providing the weapons and gear, staging the location of the bombings and even driving the vehicles to pull it off! This is not a conspiracy theory, it's been admitted by the FBI right out in the open. Even the New York Times openly reports all this in stories like this one:NYT: Terrorist Plots, Hatched by the F.B.I. (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/opinion/sunday/terrorist-plots-help...)THE United States has been narrowly saved from lethal terrorist plots in recent years -- or so it has seemed. A would-be suicide bomber was intercepted on his way to the Capitol; a scheme to bomb synagogues and shoot Stinger missiles at military aircraft was developed by men in Newburgh, N.Y.; and a fanciful idea to fly explosive-laden model planes into the Pentagon and the Capitol was hatched in Massachusetts. But all these dramas were facilitated by the F.B.I., whose undercover agents and informers posed as terrorists offering a dummy missile, fake C-4 explosives, a disarmed suicide vest and rudimentary training. ...the F.B.I. provided a van loaded with six 55-gallon drums of "inert material," harmless blasting caps, a detonator cord and a gallon of diesel fuel to make the van smell flammable. An undercover F.B.I. agent even did the driving...Comment added for clarification: I'm on the record saying, in the video posted below, that the FBI is "80% good guys" and "20% bad guys," which is typical for almost any law enforcement organization. Most FBI men and women are working in the interests of upholding the law. It's only a relatively small number who engage in the kind of terrorism training mentioned by the New York Times, above.Mystery man Holmes has no backgroundOn top of all this, Holmes apparently has no background. "He's not on anybody's radar screen -- nothing," said a peace officer in a NYT article. "This guy is somewhat of an enigma. Nobody knows anything about him." (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/21/us/colorado-mall-shooting.html)Mr. Holmes's only criminal history is a traffic summons, the authorities said. He earned a bachelor's degree with honors in neuroscience in 2010 from the University of California, Riverside, and was a graduate student in neurosciences at the University of Colorado at Denver's Anschutz Medical Campus... He was currently collecting unemployment...Question: How does an unemployed medical student afford $20,000 in weapons gear?If you start to look at the really big picture here, the obvious question arises: How does an unemployed medical student afford all the complex weapons gear, bomb-making gear, "flammable" booby trap devices, ammunition, multiple magazines, bullet-proof vest, groin protection, ballistic helmet, SWAT uniform and all the rest of it?Added July 22nd: "Police said Holmes spent months amassing explosives, weapons and ammunition." (http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/explosives-removed-from-james-...)A decent AR-15 rifle costs $1,000 or more all by itself. The shotgun and handgun might run another $800 total. Spare mags, sights, slings, and so on will run you at least another $1,000 across three firearms. The bullet-proof vest is easily another $800, and the cost of the bomb-making gear is anybody's guess. With all the specialty body gear, ammunition, booby-trap devices and more, I'm guessing this is at least $20,000 in weapons and tactical gear, much of which is very difficult for civilians to get in the first place. Comment added: Don't forget the cost of all the training (thousands of dollars) and the bomb-making equipment. Holmes reportedly had 30 improvised grenades, mortars, binary liquids that explode when mixed, wires, exotic bomb equipment... this gets expensive very quickly (even if you can source this equipment!)The mere manufacture of an explosive booby-trap device is, all by itself, a felony crime by the way. And remember: "Aurora Police Chief Dan Oates said Holmes' apartment is booby-trapped with a 'sophisticated' maze of flammable devices. It could take hours or days for authorities to disarm it," reported Yahoo News (http://sg.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/suspect-neuroscience-phd-stu...).Question: Where does an unemployed, introverted medical school student get the training to deploy sophisticated booby traps, tactical body armor, weapons systems and more? Certainly not in graduate school!All this leads to an obvious third party influence over all this. Someone else taught this guy these skills and funded the acquisition of the equipment.Update: An article posted on Sunday by the Daily Mail reveals Holmes had a "'mind-boggling' stash of ammunition" and "three types of explosives were found - jars filled with accelerates, chemicals that would explode when mixed together and more than 30 improvised grenades." This further adds to the financial cost tally of what it took to put all this together. (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2177156/James-Holmes-Dark-Kni...)The Wall Street Journal is also now reporting: "the suspect bought four guns over the past 60 days, and over the Internet bought 3,000 rounds for an assault rifle, 3,000 rounds for Glock handguns and about 300 shotgun rounds. The suspect also had a 100-round drum-style magazine for the assault rifle that would have allowed him to fire 50 to 60 rounds a minute." (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000087239639044446430457754103267932..)Note: Some readers have questioned the $20,000 figure estimated here, saying this gear could have been acquired for only $10,000 or so. I doubt that, as all the extras that you need to effectively run these guns cost a lot of money: training courses, spare magazines, etc. Just a decent AR-15 battle sight (a holographic red dot sight) can run $1,000 - $2,000. Search "ACOG" if you don't believe me. It is also reported that Holmes bought 6,000 rounds of ammo, which definitely isn't cheap either, especially given that we now know half of those rounds were rifle rounds. It's clear this guy was spending big bucks. Whether it's $10k or $20k isn't really that much of a point.Staged just in time for a vote on the UN small arms treaty?More and more, this shooting is looking like a deliberate plot staged by the government itself much like Operation Fast and Furious pulled off by the ATF (http://www.naturalnews.com/032934_ATF_illegal_firearms.html) which helped smuggle tens of thousands of guns into Mexico for the purpose of causing "gun violence" in the USA, then blaming the Second Amendment for it.All this looks like James Holmes completed a "mission" and then calmly ended that mission by surrendering to police and admitting everything. The mission, as we are now learning, was to cause as much terror and mayhem as possible, then to have that multiplied by the national media at exactly the right time leading up the UN vote next week on a global small arms treaty that could result in gun confiscation across America. (http://lewrockwell.com/eddlem/eddlem61.1.html)Even Forbes.com wrote about this quite extensively, warning readers about the coming gun confiscation effort related to the UN treaty. The story was authored by Larry Bell (http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2011/06/07/u-n-agreement-should...) and says the UN treaty could "override our national sovereignty, and in the process, provide license for the federal government to assert preemptive powers over state regulatory powers guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment in addition to our Second Amendment rights."In other words, this has all the signs of Fast & Furious, Episode II. I wouldn't be surprised to discover someone in Washington was behind it all. After all, there's no quicker way to disarm a nation and take total control over the population than to stage violence, blame it on firearms, then call for leaders to "do something!" Such calls inevitably end up resulting in gun confiscation, and it's never too long after that before government genocide really kicks in like we saw with Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao and other tyrants.Governments routinely murder millionsHere's a short list of government mass murder carried out throughout history, almost always immediately following the disarmament of the public (and usually involving staged false flag events to justify the disarmament):50+ million dead: Mao Ze-Dong (China, 1958-61 and 1966-69, Tibet 1949-50)12+ million dead: Adolf Hitler (Germany, 1939-1945) - concentration camps, civilian deaths and dead Russian POWs8+ million dead: Leopold II of Belgium (Congo, 1886-1908)6+ million dead: Jozef Stalin (USSR, 1932-39)5+ million dead: Hideki Tojo (Japan, 1941-44)2+ million dead: Ismail Enver (Turkey, 1915-22)1.7 million dead: Pol Pot (Cambodia, 1975-79)1.6 million dead: Kim Il Sung (North Korea, 1948-94)1.5 million dead: Menghistu (Ethiopia, 1975-78)1 million dead: Yakubu Gowon (Biafra, 1967-1970)900,000 dead: Leonid Brezhnev (Afghanistan, 1979-1982)800,000 dead: Jean Kambanda (Rwanda, 1994)See more at:http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/dictat.htmlDeath by government:http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/DBG.CHAP1.HTMhttp://www.infowars.com/democide-government-killed-over-260-million-i...A "monopoly of force" in government is far more dangerous than a crazed lone shooterSo yes, James Holmes and other crazed shooters kill a number of people each year in random acts of violence. It's horrifying and wrong, but it's nothing compared to the millions of lives that governments tend to destroy when they gain total power over the populace.The most dangerous thing in the world, it turns out, is not a crazy person with a rifle; it's a government with a "monopoly of force" over the entire population. And that's exactly what the UN spells out as its goal for the world: Stripping all power from individual citizens and handing "monopolies of force" to the governments of the world, shoring up their positions as the only "legitimate" power on the planet.See this document entitled, "Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF)" policy paper No. 24:http://www.naturalnews.com/files/Revisiting-the-State-Monopoly-on-the...As this document reveals, a table entitled "Governance solutions for reasserting the state monopoly on the use of force" lists the options available to governments to re-establish "monopolies of force" against their own people:• (Re-)establish state monopoly- Ownership of WMDs- Safety Inspectorates• Prohibit business activity- Justice and Execution- Deadly Force?• Regulate/limit activities- Private defense/security services- Control of financial transfers- Export controls- Transport and infrastructure safety- Environmental impactInterestingly, that document also describes "terrorism" in a way that perfectly matches the Aurora, Colorado "Batman" movie theater shooter:Terrorists aim to spread panic and fear in societies in order to achieve political goals, be they based on left- or right-wing, social-revolutionary, nationalistic or religious ideologies. They are organized in a clandestine way, most often in small groups and cells... Typical tactical means include kidnapping, hostage-taking, sabotage, murder, suicide attacks, vehicle bombs and improvised explosive devices.A global monopoly of forceThis document is a goldmine of information about the globalist agenda to disarm and enslave the population. Check out page 28, which reads:The legitimate monopoly of force should not be limited to the nation-state but should be based on the local, national, regional and the global levels.Global Security Governance and the Monopoly of ForceAt the global level no monopoly of violence exists. The UN Security Council already has a monopoly power to authorize the use of force at the global level, although the UN was never given the necessary means to exercise this authority, such as the capacity to implement sanctions, a police force and armed forces...This deficiency in global governance acts as a bottleneck and a barrier to the creation of the democratically legitimized monopoly of violence that is globally required.This story gets deep, doesn't it? Watch for more analysis here at NaturalNews.com, where we still fight for liberty and justice in a world that's increasingly becoming enslaved.UPDATE: Follow-up story now posted that asks the question: Why did no one fight back?That story is available now at NaturalNews.com:http://www.naturalnews.com/036537_James_Holmes_Batman_shooting.htmlhttp://www.naturalnews.com/036536_James_Holmes_shooting_false_flag.htmlUPDATE: Aurora, Colorado already had strict gun control laws in place!After this article was published, it became known that Aurora, Colorado has strict anti-gun laws in place, including laws that criminalize carrying concealed weapons.Thus, the city officials of Aurora actually created an environment in which victims would be unarmed and at a considerable disadvantage against an armed attacked.Read more details about this here:http://www.naturalnews.com/036549_Aurora_concealed_carry_gun_confisca...Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/036537_James_Holmes_Batman_shooting.html#ixzz2FG1An8zxclifylqhttp://www.clifylq.com/http://clifylq.livejournal.com/http://clifylq.blogspot.com/ http://www.myspace.com/434997466/bloghttp://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/http://clifylq.livejournal.com/calendarTODAY THE EXACT THING IS HAPPENING WITH NEWTON, CT SCHOOL SHOOTING AMERICA!!http://clifylq.livejournal.com/123682.htmlHONORING THE VICTIMS OF THE TRAGEDY IN NEWTOWN, CONNECTICUTObama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth? What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment.http://www.dailypaul.com/162171/very-serious-warningobama-finds-legal-way-around-the-2nd-amendment-and-uses-itBY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAA PROCLAMATIONAs a mark of respect for the victims of the senseless acts of violence perpetrated on December 14, 2012, in Newtown, Connecticut, by the authority vested in me as President of the United States by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby order that the flag of the United States shall be flown at half-staff at the White House and upon all public buildings and grounds, at all military posts and naval stations, and on all naval vessels of the Federal Government in the District of Columbia and throughout the United States and its Territories and possessions until sunset, December 18, 2012. I also direct that the flag shall be flown at half-staff for the same length of time at all United States embassies, legations, consular offices, and other facilities abroad, including all military facilities and naval vessels and stations.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourteenth day of December, in the year of our Lord two thousand twelve, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-seventh.BARACK OBAMA AKA BARRY SOETERO AKA BARRY DUNHAM AKA BARRY OBAMA AKA BARACK DUNHAMhttp://clifylq.livejournal.com/101780.htmlDefenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million. http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/2009/03/evil-jews-behind-gun-control-in-america.html"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let's not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country." --Adolf Hitler http://constitutionalistnc.tripod.com/hitler-leftist/id14.htmlAMERICA WHY DOES CLIFYLQ SAY WE SHOULD ELECT PUTIN FOR PRESIDENT OVER AMERICA AND JAIL THE PRESIDENTIAL IMPERSONATOR BARRY SOETERO IN OFFICE BEING PUPPETED AROUND BY ZIONIST JEW GANGSTERS? REVIEW THESE LINKS FOR THE ANSWER: http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=646, http://clifylq.livejournal.com/111118.html Current Mood: angry (Comment on this)[ Previous 20 ]

TAGS:AWAKENING OF AMERICA 

<<< Thank you for your visit >>>

Hot Websites