THE TRUTH ABOUT THE LAW
Time 2022-09-15 20:58:36Web Name: THE TRUTH ABOUT THE LAW
WebSite: http://www.thetruthaboutthelaw.com
ID:316293
Keywords:
TRUTH,THE,LAW,ABOUTDescription:
THE TRUTH ABOUT THE LAW
Legalman — America's most trustworthy lawyer.
THE TRUTH IS RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU… AND THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE
You have found this site for a reason. Are you ready to remove the blindfold from your brain?
If there is one thing that practicing law for 25 years has taught me, it is that a single WELL PLACED question is a very powerful tool. String two or three together and you can stumble into some pretty surprising information. Ask the wrong questions, and you will get nowhere.
In order to ask the right questions you have to FIRST understand the actual situation, what you ACTUALLY KNOW, and maybe even more importantly, what you don’t KNOW but have assumed. Like the U.S.G.S azimuthal equidistant projection map right above… a perspective change is sometimes the key to seeing what you’re missing. It can change everything without having to “change” anything. Do you see?
“if I had an hour to solve a problem I’d spend 55 minutes thinking about the problem and 5 minutes thinking about solutions” — Albert Einstein
Why do you think they make everyone go to school for 12 years using THEIR mandatory curriculum? If you say “to get an education”, then they have done their job on you.
If you’ve had a vague idea that there is “something wrong”… you’re right. There are many things wrong with what you have been taught. The reason things don’t add up wherever you look is that there is a disconnect between what you are told and what you observe. The systems in place are DESIGNED to CREATE that disconnect to make sure you become confused, or discouraged or just apathetic to the system, like most people.
The system, especially the legal system, is not what you have been told. It is a maze without an exit, you can’t win within it.
This same “false paradigm” is used in many areas besides just the law. These illusions are there to confuse and thereby CONTROL YOU. And, like most big deceptions, the truth is hidden in plain site. It WAS THERE all along. You just didn’t SEE it.
Don’t feel bad, I certainly didn’t understand what I was looking RIGHT AT for most of my life. I kept trying to figure things out from within the paradigm I had been taught. Now I know that CAN NEVER WORK, because the system itself is NOT OPERATING INSIDE the paradigm we are taught. And once you see this, you cannot UNsee it.
“The task is … not so much to see what no one has yet seen: but to think what nobody has yet thought, about that which everybody sees.” — Erwin Schrodinger
It took 25 years after graduating from law school to UNlearn all the bullsh** they had taught me there. When you finally understand the REAL system and how it actually works, many confusing and frustrating things will finally make perfect sense. At that point you can avoid a lot of problems and you will no longer be frustrated by a lot things, because it will all make sense. It is a journey my brainwashed Brethren you have to take the time to unlearn.
Religion was the heart of the control system used on the masses for a very long time. But in the last few hundred years or so, that has changed. Now, the law is the heart of the control system.
Its success, just like the success of the religious control systems before it, relies on a deep pervasive mis-education about the system itself. That mis-education amounts to a kind of brainwashing.
“Deception is a state of mind and the mind of the State.” — James Angleton.
It has always been known by those who rule over the masses that most people are not prepared to deal with the truth. So the masses have always been “taught”, at best, a sort of a fairy tale or parable, at worst, outright lies. And this is true regardless of the control system being used.
It is so in religion,
I fed you with milk, not solid food, for you were not ready for it. And even now you are not yet ready, — First Corinthians
in politics,
and even in the history we are taught that shapes our beliefs and provides the basis to operate the control systems.
“History is a set of lies agreed upon.” — Napoleon
The very first step on the journey to understanding the real system is to be genuinely open to the idea that what you think you “know” and were taught, may be fundamentally incorrect. As simple as that sounds it is probably the thing that keeps most people from moving forward. They either don’t really want to admit that they are wrong or don’t know, or they prefer not to know what they suspect may be true. So they ignore it all and hence, continue to be ruled by those who DO KNOW and don’t hesitate to use this ignorance against the masses for their own power.
“The bigger the lie, the more it will be believed.” — Goebbels
To understand the system you have to first grasp that you have been PUT into A system. And when you grasp the full significance of that, you can begin to be RE-educated about what the actual system is for the first time. And once you see that, then you can step outside the mental box that the system is. And once you can do that, you are free. Free in a way that they can never take from you, because you will never be fooled by any of the systems again.
And the truth shall set you free my friend.
The best way to understand the way a system works is to start by looking at one part. Master one area and then apply the lessons. Like the old Hermetic wisdom says:
“As above, so below. As below, so above.”
If you can start to see the scope of the deception perpetrated in one area, like the law, then I find that people become more open to the idea that perhaps they have been greatly misled in other areas as well. And since my expertise is technically in the law, perhaps you will give me a bit of leeway in showing you some of that giant con that is “the law”.
So now as the narcissist said, I’ve talked enough about me for now, why don’t you talk about me for a while. Let’s have some fun. Everyone likes to have fun, right? Let’s see if I can show you what I mean and let’s see how you think. Before we go any further, I want to be clear upfront:
THIS SITE IS FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY. Are we clear?
And that statement is true, MY ENTERTAINMENT purposes.
YOU HAVE TO PARSE EVERYTHING. That is one way a truth can be hidden in plain sight. You don’t see it at first, but then once you see it you can’t UNsee it. But that’s “just a trick” Legalman. Well you can call it a “trick”, but that “trick” has LEGAL IMPLICATIONS. That is my point. Words matter. But what do they actually MEAN?
Think about statements like, “the country has decided”. “It is “the law”. “You consent through a social contract”. “We all must sacrifice.” “You don’t have standing to bring suit”. “The juror is “disqualified”. “The evidence is not admissible.” “The committee is in charge of that.” “It’s just a side effect of the medicine”. “They are our enemy”. “They are a terrorist.” And on an on. Do you see that the devil is in the details.
So you still may be thinking, so, that’s a just piddly crap. Games, nothing but games, I don’t have time for GAMES, lol. Okay, let’s do another little test. This one certainly doesn’t involve anything that can even arguably be called a “trick”. Let’s see how much you know about the fundamental law of the land that RULES YOU. You know the “holy constitution”.
Are you generally a liberal a conservative or some kind of a “mix”? You know a mix, socially “liberal” but fiscally conservative for example? Take a look at this list. Which things do you think, if any, the federal government has a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to regulate in some way? Here’s a link to the Constitution in case you need to brush up first.
Drugs, both “street” and pharmaceuticals.
Unemployment insurance.
National parks.
Education.
Welfare.
Social security.
Energy production.
Abortion.
Gay marriage.
Fighting ISIS overseas.
How many made your list? A lot, a few? How much agreement between people do you think there is in the country on this list? Now I know that a lot of people don’t feel “qualified” to give an opinion on whether something is “constitutional” but I’m not asking whether you know it is or isn’t, I’m just asking your opinion.
Can we at least agree that there are a lot of people with opinions on each side of each of those issues? And can we agree that there are a lot of people who may agree that the government has a constitutional right to do some of what they are doing in any one area, but not other things in that same area?
Would you agree then that on most any issue there are people on both sides of the “it is constitutional” or “it is not constitutional” issue?
And now would you agree that one of those groups is right and one is wrong? In other words, the government either does have the constitutional right to do something or it doesn’t. Is that a fair statement? Because, if that isn’t true, then why is there a method to amend it,? Isn’t that the whole reason it is there, to add to or remove from the list of things that are constitutional? Of course it is.
Now think about how big the government is now. How much it has grown over the 200 plus years it has existed under the constitution. Do you believe we need to “get back to the constitution” in many areas because what the government is doing is “unconstitutional”?
If you think we have strayed from the constitution, you are not alone. A very large number of people agree with you. But would you agree that a very large number of people disagree with you? And those people believe that what the government is doing is fully supported by the constitution, like most democrats on the blue team?
So in the end would you agree that there is a disagreement about whether the government has the authority to do what it is doing? Can we agree on all of this? Okay.
Now I want you to read this quote and think about it.
The Constitution has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist. – Lysander Spooner
Please reread it and take a moment to let that sink in.
Do you see the consequence of that statement?
Do you see the unassailable logic?
The unavoidable result of the reasoning is that if you think the government is doing things that are “unconstitutional”, and you think we “need to get back to the constitution,” that entire way of thinking is fundamentally illogical and can NEVER lead anywhere. It doesn’t make sense. Because, if you are right, and the government is doing things where it has no CONSTITUTIONAL authority, then, nonetheless, the “highest law of the land”, the Constitution, has not been able to prevent this fundamental violation of the fundamental law. In other words, the Constitution has not provided any protection for the people from the federal government continually and repeatedly violating it.
Remember, the government’s SOLE source of ANY authority at all IS the Constitution. So if it is acting without constitutional authority, it is acting without ANY authority. But the Constitution has not been able to prevent the government acting outside of its legal scope of authority. So what good is it? It is no good. In fact it is a source of harm, because it masquerades as a protector of the people and a limitation on the government.
And, if on the other hand, the Federal government in fact HAS Constitutional “authority” to regulate any and every aspect of our lives as it now claims, and in fact acts, such as dictating how much water your toilet can use per flush, then the limitations that the Constitution proclaims to put on the Federal Government are in fact, non-existent. Certainly any document which professes to create a limited government, when it in fact authorizes an unlimited government, is a fraud on the people. And any such document does not deserve to exist.
The point is either way, THE CONSTITUTION IS UNFIT TO EXIST, because it either can’t prevent the federal government from doing whatever it wants, or it authorizes the federal government to do whatever it wants, even though it professes to be a document creating a LIMITED federal government.
Do you get it now? Do you now see that any and all discussions about “getting back to the constitution”, or looking at the constitution are a waste of time! They are just a distraction! All part of the red/team blue/team “work within the system” scam. The constitution has PROVED that it is either useless or a fraud.
Now let me tell you that the quote I gave you above was written in the 1860’s! 150 years ago! Imagine how much the government has grown since then!
My point is simple. The entire framework within which the people are immersed and think in this country is intentionally misdirected. Why have you never seen the point I just made? Why have you never heard this argument?
Simple, the LEGAL system serves the people in power, the Status Quo, the Money Power, the powers that be, the rulers or WHATEVER you care to call them. The LAW is the means by which they control the people. The great trick that has been played on everyone is that the people believe the law serves THEM.
You must understand the following. Most everything you know about the law is fundamentally incorrect. When you understand and accept that, you can open your mind sufficiently to begin to make sense of the law.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself, without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane and intolerable, and so, if he is romantic, he tries to change it. And even if he is not romantic personally he is very apt to spread discontent among those who are.” — H. L. Mencken
You simply will not see the vast majority of the information I have on this site other places. If you can find any of it, it is going to be in an academic format. It will be dense and it will be intimidating to most people. Certainly it is not available in a format that any normal person would wade through.
That’s the whole reason I started this. People do need to know. They WANT to know, but there was no way to find it out, until now.
Once you have seen, you cannot UNSEE, as I said my friend.
I add articles and audio posts all the time. The topics will never end. They can’t, because the LAW is involved in almost everything.
Just click on the “A starting point for the TRUTH” if you want to start to understand. I give you a organized way to understand it all. If you go to a post and you see a little ear, it means that I have provided additional audio material to go with the article.
My “Fascinating other stuff” and all of the “More Fascinating stuff” additions are an amalgam of different very cool non legal topics. The stuff is great. There are so many things to investigate. I don’t claim expertise on them, but I have researched all of them to some extent or the other. I would love to get a heads up on crazy stuff you have seen or see.
“Distractions in the news” is a section where you can see articles I find of interest and WHY I find them of interest. I discuss topics and tell you why I suspect they are “in the news” or NOT. A nice place to see the principles I discuss used to see the world in a new way. When posted they appear with the man reading the newspaper. I then repost them separately in my “Distractions” section so you can see what I have discussed throughout time in order all together and judge for yourself the effectiveness and predictive ability of using the system I try and explain.
Feedback is great. If you like what you read, or you don’t, leave a comment. I can only provide bread and circuses if the people tell me what they like. I don’t share info with anyone so feel free to sign up. I know that won’t convince most people, but what else can I actually offer to convince? Nothing.
And as always if you want to actually DO something to spread the word and wake people up, which is step one, send them to my site or to one of my posts. You will be doing them a big favor. Knowing the truth is the best protection you can get.
As the saying goes. A journey of a thousand miles begins with the first step… and ends when you find the truth.
Take care my brainwashed Brethren. Move towards the light, and tell someone the truth about the law. — Legalman
142 thoughts on “THE TRUTH IS RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU… AND THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE”
Yo Legal, have missed seeing recent posts lately. Distractions are an amazing tool of the PTB’s. Cognitive Dissonance is rampant. Divisions and schisms among the slaves seems to have gone too far. Those pulling the strings may have frayed a string or two causing a downward trend in profits. Control may be waning due to too much pressure causing meltdowns in the populous. Maybe a little too much poisoning from big pharma, big agra, and a plethora of corporate interests with” pay to look the other way politics”. But we still have the masses wearing their favorite teams jerseys to mindlessly cheer and spout those all important statistics. But not all is lost… there is always the upside of a much lowered population to manage. and our quantum computers and colliders teaming up to rip holes in the fabric of time and space with the very promising prospect of plainly changing history. OR the PTB’s are simply bored and want to ramp up the excitement by harassing the livestock and giggle while watching the chaos, oh and have an election with hopelessly pathetic and unqualified people to just see how far these slaves will go to prove out the experiment…lol it is truly, in that arena, a mad mad mad world. Hope to hear from you… Stay healthy as best as you can. look to what is important, family, friends helping others. .. Peace
Absolutely brilliant Legalman. For most people, what Jack Nicholson said in “A Few Good Men” applies; “You can’t handle the truth.” Your quote on history was excellent but my favorite is Voltaire’s, “History is a trick the living play upon the dead.” The bottom line is that the legal industry in the ooo-esss-aaa was created for lawyers (and bear in mind that judges are just lawyers in black Halloween costumes) to extract wealth from the people and funnel it up to themselves and the entities they serve, be they governmental or private. The distinction hardly matters anymore, both are part and parcel of the Big Brother matrix. No document made of ink and paper will protect you from a power system that has sycophants with weapons in their employ and the keys to the cages to enforce their edicts. Deal with reality or reality will deal with you. By the way, that “strawman” bullshit is just more patriot mythology to delude and confuse the masses, like the gold fringed flag and your name in caps is a fiction and not the real you, ad nauseum. Keep punching Brother.
Thank you Hereticdrummer. Glad you enjoyed it. I liked the line you slipped in that was modified in “Payback” “take care of business or the business will take care of you”. great movie. lol And yes the entire system is a transparent fraud. A joke really on the people who think it is something else.
Thanks again for saying hi. I hope to see you over on twitter sometime. Take care. — L
YOUR ASSESSMENT OF JEFFERSON IS FLAWED . HE IS TWICE THE MAN WE ARE…WHO CARES ABOUT THE LAND DEALS WITH RUSSIA / FRANCE !
FOCUS ON THE ILLEGAL LAND / RESOURCE GRABS ..THE CLIVEN BUNDY VERDICT MAY CEASE ALL
BILL OF RIGHTS PROTECTION…THE CONSTITUTION HAS BEEN TRASHED BEGINNING IN 1913.
IF NOTHING ELSE , READ THE FOLLOWING ( IGNORED IN CLASSROOMS }
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.TJ
this guidance means more today than back in his day…
GT, I believe I addressed the value of mere words. Lots of people say lots of brilliant things they never mean. We simply cannot know what kind of a man he was. But to throw away the conduct that contradicts the words with a waive of the hand and a “who cares” really is not very persuasive. But I know one thing. I can’t change people’s minds and I don’t bother trying.
I might suggest trying that whole throw off government thing with the current government he supposedly created and see how far you get. — L
Show me a presidential swearing in where one of them has adopted THIS constitution ! It simply sits dormant and unable to do what it was meant to do. I think it’s the difference between an article 2 and an article 6 oath.
Jean-Francois Revel explained why the truth is difficult to see: “There are essentially two kinds of totalitarian systems. There are those whose ideas I will call straightforward, and that makes their aims perfectly clear. Mussolini and Hitler always said they were hostile to democracy, to freedom of expression and culture, to political pluralism and free trade unionism. Hitler, additionally explained at great length, well before coming to power, his racist, and specifically anti-Semitic, ideology. Therefore, supporters and adversaries of this type of totalitarianism were from the start on opposite sides of a clearly defined line. There were no “disillusioned” Hitlerians: Hitler accomplished what he promised. His downfall was due to external causes.”
“Communism differs in that it made use of ideological subterfuges. If I may use some Hegelian jargon, I would say that Communism was “mediated by way of utopianism” It is the utopian connection that allowed this ideology, and the political regime it produced, to proclaim an unending stream of successes even as it was doing the opposite of its declared program. Communism promised abundance and produced misery, it promised freedom and led to slavery, it promised equality and ended up in the most stratified of societies, with a privileged nomenklatra such as had not been seen since the age of feudalism It promised to respect human life and engaged in mass murders, it promised the cultural enhancement of all and led to generalized mental crippling, it dreamed of a “new man” and instead petrified him. And yet for many years believers accepted all these grotesque contradictions because utopia is always somewhere in the future. The intellectual trap of a totalitarian ideology mediated by utopia is therefore far more difficult to counter than the straightforward ideology of nazism and fascism because, in utopian thinking, real facts never suffice to prove to believers that the ideology itself is false.”
“As the devious strategies of totalitarian utopianism have been dissected by the very intellectuals whom they were designed to mislead, and defeated by the very people whom they were suppose to hold in servitude forever, we in the West should recognize our debt to them, our eternal debt.”
– Jean-Francois Revel from the the Forward to Eyewitness: Writings from the Ordeal of Communism (Edited and compiled by Ross Mackenzie and Todd Culbertson)
Thanks Legalman, Man having any hope is a dangerous thing. I have always considered myself as insignificant and not so tasty. Not formidable, by any means. I have already been hounded by IRS for numbers of years and I am prepared to settle the accounts. That is how a dead man’s estate is handled. If that means that some disgruntled justice or some other power may react, I cannot control that or live in fear of the imagination of consequences. I will not be contentious. I am just settling the estate as straight up as I can. I do not know how to do it any other way. I would like to see their convoluted excuse for their claim. Hey, I appreciate you taking the moment. Peace.
so does one, when invited to answer a claim in said Court of non repute, throw up their hands and surrender all that is claimed? or does one challenge the veracity of the Powers that Be and at the very least see the “excuse” for jurisdiction and usurpation of rights for the claimant to take property and insure bondage upon the alleged debtor? see https://supremecourtcase.wordpress.com/author/supremecourtcase .
I am familiar with that case Kram. Unfortunately I think he is right in his analysis. lol. But does it make one bit of difference? no. b/c nothing they do is legitimate anyway. They have the guns and the bulk of the people fooled into thinking they are legitimate and need to be followed and supported, and that they can only voice their dissent through “elections” etc. So that is that. Sure you can raise the stuff he references on jurisdiction, of course you can. But ultimately all that will happen is you will either get stomped on right there by the court, or you will be cancer’d or accidented down the road. If they really want to make an example of you, then you will be found hanging with your pants down after “accidentally” choking yourself to death during some lurid sex act etc. in some hotel room where you were “looking at” kiddie porn etc. They reserve that for people who just don’t take a hint. lol
The world is what it is. A giant farce. A fraud from head to toe. Best to see what you’re actually dealing with and then deal with what you are actually seeing. There is no other advice I can give that will be of more assistance I’m sorry to say. Doesn’t mean the advice leads to outcomes you like, only that it will lead to the best outcome available. — L
Thanks L. There are layers upon layers of meaning. The passage you shared echoes what the Teacher said choosing this day whom you shall serve- in that our lot here is as a creation, no disrespect just a statement of fact. lol do we get to choose “none of the above” not sure how that looks at this moment. In the meanwhile I plan on having fun with the whole self determination thing (as a slave to my Creator) while i settle all commercial claims and accounts. regardless in the end when there is nothing belonging to the name, this flesh and bone is noncollectable at the very least not worth the effort. I am learning the game a bit. RPC, RFP, simple principles, standing, jurisdiction, burden of proof, etc. lol a game that is a loaded deck. I have no illusions here. Nice to share here. Be well.
Some insightful words by Peter the apostle writing to the now believing Israelite s at that time. He says alot about what we are experiencing now. Here are a couple of quotes. Please I am not trying to convince anyone to believe in dogmatic Christianity which is a joke if one condones violence, coercion, intimidation, or misinformation to meet an end result, regardless. With that said . 2nd Peter 2 15-19 …Leaving the straight path….who loves the wages of injustice…For , uttering pompous vanity, they are luring by the lusts of the flesh, in wantonness, those who are scarcely fleeing from those who are behaving with deception; promising them freedom, they are inherently slaves of corruption. ”
Legalman you said…. Once you have seen you cannot unsee.. there is more there for those who learn the truth and then return to mindless participation as being worse off than if they never knew the truth in the first place…
There is this crazy responsibility with knowledge. “My people suffer for lack of Knowledge” my paraphrase ‘woe to those who have hidden the keys to knowledge’ or ‘who have obscured the tables (law) from the people’ You my brainwashed friend are flicking your Bic and that light is being seen. Peace.
Well thank you Kram. I agree that people who know and still continue to support and encourage and hide for personal gain are doing themselves a lot more damage than the vast majority of poor dupes who simply cannot see. And of course I am a big believer that people can only accept the truth at their own pace. No point trying to force it on people it doesn’t work. You have to make the truth available to them. If they are curious then answer their questions. If they are not curious or don’t believe, then let them go on their way in peace. Everyone has to find their own way.
I like the Bible and have read it many times. I am certainly not a “Christian” by any means, but that doesn’t mean the book does not have a lot of very profound wisdom. It does. Of course most of it is misunderstood, in my humble opinion. But it is there to be culled. Your comment reminded me of a passage from the book of James that I like a lot. There are many many things we simply do not know and the what and why are beyond our direct knowledge at this point ultimately. And that must always be kept in mind.
“Now listen, you who say, “Today or tomorrow we will go to this or that city, spend a year there, carry on business and make money.” Why, you do not even know what will happen tomorrow. What is your life? You are a mist that appears for a little while and then vanishes. Instead, you ought to say, “If it is the Lord’s will, we will live and do this or that.” As it is, you boast in your arrogant schemes. All such boasting is evil. If anyone, then, knows the good they ought to do and doesn’t do it, it is sin for them.”
But just because we can’t know the reasons or the “why or how” does not mean there is not reason and a why and how. So we must use the little we do figure out each time we are here to keep moving forward. Regardless of how unpleasant that fact may be to accept. lol. From what I can tell there is no other choice.
To him who much is given, much is expected. And so it goes. Take care — L
Hi Legalman,
Just wondering, in re your posting of the USGS map if you happen to be an FE type of guy?
Enjoy all your work.
Please continue… but what can we actually DO about it all??
Sully I’ve been looking at it for almost a full year. Many unanswered questions that should be simple but aren’t. Several empirical observations I have carefully performed do not fit with standard line we are given. Gyroscopes are problematic. Moon illumination change pattern does not fit orbit pattern we are told is causing moon illumination change. Antarctic treaty’s rapid ratification during Cold War very suspicious. It’s terms and enforcement raise serious questions. And there are many other issues. Why do so many “people” just happen to spend huge amounts of time making very expensive “debunking” vids? Where do they get time and money and why? I don’t see the logic behind debunking things that are “obviously” bs. There are no zombie debunking videos or vampire debunking etc. why such a profusion available? Why do they avoid or misrepresent the basic arguments? Why so much animosity? Truth doesn’t rely upon attacks. Truth welcomes investigation because truth knows that investigation will lead to converts. It is deception that uses all the other techniques we see used against This idea. Paid trolls, personal attacks, obvious controlled opposition, well organized “debunking” etc. So if I was more of a suspicious person I might be suspicious. Luckily I have full confidence in NASA and my government so I can relax and know that I have the full story
So of course it is all kookery. I mean if it were true then everyone would know right? You could never keep it a secret. Every government in the world assures me of the truth. And that’s good enough for me. And as forest gump said, ” that’s all I have to say about that.” Take care. — L
Yes, truth welcomes investigation. On the other hand, false propaganda is presented as “settled science.”
Yes, I agree. Just too many things that are simply observable that don’t fit the standard line model. I can see problems with both sides; I suspect that the reality may be some other truth that maybe we don’t fully understand yet.
I find it very interesting that certain Hollywood types (illusionists) are very into pushing the NASA an moon landings etc, e.g. Tom Hanks and Ron Howard for starters.
One more thing sully. My next post will present the simplest fix available. And of course you won’t hear about it anywhere but here. Lol. — L
Only the human ego prevents mankind from now realizing Aston’s 1922 promise.
See paper, “Stalin’s science,” posted earlier.
Oliver I allow a post or two like this because I know you are passionate. But they are just so far off topic I will keep them to a minimum. I wish you the best in spreading your message. — L
Thank you, Legalman. I am passionate about getting out the message from Professors F. W. Aston and P. K. Kuroda:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/STALINS_SCIENCE.pdf
Legalman ?
is there any way you can help us out ?
simply by explaining WHO EMPOWERED THEM ?
AND HOW TO GET THEM NOT EMPOWERED anymore ?
there is a lot of sheer crap legislation out here inflicting misery on people starting with the CPS crew and then the probate bastards w/illegal guardianship cases=our people are kidnapped and it seems that these courts go after any attorneys even attempting to DARE challenge-bringing us to the bar associations which will suspend their licenses or in a few cases they are disbarred–
can you think of anything ?
this is a cartel.
we are truly powerless as THEY ARE THE LAW and the laws are BS, and THEY ENFORCE THE LAWS and we can’t get our family members FREED or in some cases,even get them REUNITED WITH THEIR LAW ABIDING FAMILIES.
i simply need to know WHO EMPOWERED THEM AND HOW ?
THEN we can maybe get something moving.
Well Serena I am not sure exactly what the issues are that you are facing. But I don’t give legal advice to people over the web. I am sorry.
As to who “empowered them”. That would be your neighbors. lol I hope things improve. Take care. — L
This site is the BEST Legalman!
There’s no disputing the content here.
I’m so glad I found it, as it reaffirms that there are people like yourself who actually understand how things work and are willing to share the truth.
I have a suggestion that may help.
Youtube videos are always getting deleted for various reasons.
You may want to consider downloading the ones you feel are important and creating an Amazon S3 bucket to put them in to preserve the content. It’s really inexpensive as well.
Thank you for all the time you’ve put into this and stay strong!
” I would love to get a heads up on crazy stuff you have seen or see.”
I have a story for you that is something at least 15 experts in my case have never seen if you are interested.
Sean Dix
The events of 9112001 awakened me to this unwelcome reality:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281017812_STALIN'S_SCIENCE
I’ve read alot on the illuminati…. and their history … AND even presently. … George soros…??? 911…. LOSE change. .. Awesome information that I get entangled in.
There is a lot of stuff out there Crazy. Of course there is a lot of disinfo as well. I’d say figuring which is which is one of the most difficult tasks there is. I hope you find my site useful and entertaining. Glad you’re here. — L
We do have to get back to the constitution – but the real constitution. #CCOT DID U KNOW THERE ARE 2 CONSTITUTIONS? http://WWW.FEDERALJACK.COM/SLAVERY-BY-CONSENT-THE-UNITED-STATES-CORPORATION/
El Floyo, I have answered this type of question many times in my comments. I don’t have the energy to do it yet again. I will simply say that I am more than familiar with all of the “all capital letters” maritime law, the united states is a corporation arguments. Please simply read the comments I have made on this many times. Take care. — L
thetruthaboutthelaw.com has potential, you can make your site go viral easily using one tricky method.
Just type in google:
Isud’s Method To Go Viral
I’ve been trying (several times now) to register but your site appears not to accept the activation link.
Sorry to hear that ecrp. I have checked again, and I can’t seem to duplicate the issue. If it continues please let me know. — L
Legalman,
“I’ve come to your site a few times and have been entertained and informed by the articles here-not to mention the little graphics asides!
I’m from Australia, and our constitution was modelled partly on the US system and partly on British models, even with some Swiss and perhaps other influences.
Our constitution seems to be essentially the same deal as the US constitution-lots of rights apparently, but a movable feast when it comes down to brass tacks.
Lefties criticise the way a small state like Tasmania can have disproportionate political clout because all States have equal representation in the Senate, regardless of population. Perhaps they have a point, because the basis for this is that this system was voted on by voters across Australia back in the 1890’s. No-one alive consented to this.
I’ve studied the small constitutionalist movement in Australia such as Upmart and Brian Shaw and they are all into the idea that the current Federal arrangement is valid because people over 100 years ago agreed to it. That makes me a little suspicious of these groups.
They also have this odd tendency to celebrate the Australian sacrifice in the First World War. They seem to believe the dead in this war fell for freedom and the constitution rather than the bankers who benefited from it. No doubt you are familiar with this type of thing among the US populace.
That sentiment also make me suspicious of these groups and who is really behind them.
What do you think of Strawman theory? Do you have any time for it?
Upmart used to go into quite a lot of Strawman stuff but now recommend against it. I wrote to them asking for clarification and they ignored me.
Maybe that means Strawman works. Maybe too many people were deriving too much benefit from Strawman strategies so whoever is really behind Upmart told them to stop teaching it. Or maybe not. All I know is that they wouldn’t answer my simple question of why they used to teach and now are against it.
Bonza, I am not familiar with how you are using the term Strawman. I know what a strawman argument is, but I’m not sure that’s what you’re asking. I apologize for the delay, I was out and unavailable for a week. Of course like you, when they can’t answer a simple question, well… that says a lot. — L
I think by strawman he means the legal name, the corporate fiction that looks like your name, the strawman. There is a great deal of contention regarding this thing. Some, like Rob Menard, say make a claim on it, use it. Others say it is a NAME registered to the crown and is not yours, so the idea is to remove the nexus between the living man and the fiction, thereby placing the burden of all claims against that name on the owners of that name (the Crown). I believe the most cogent perspective on this comes to us from Anna Von Reitzinger http://www.annavonreitz.com/index.html.
The citizen thing comes into play here as well. The Strawman, the NAME, is a US citizen while the man, born in one of the fifty states, not a federal employee, not born in DC or a naturalized citizen is an American national, one of the creators. They know this. The maxim here is government can only control that which government creates, everything else is outside its jurisdiction. However, since we are under “special admiralty” that has no rules of procedure the PTB make up the rules as they go. Now ,it seems, they have decided the Hell with with all of it it’s time for the great culling so they may rule the world as they see fit. We have no place in that world. We sure are in a pickle.
Great article! I write about the same issues at Liberty Road Media . Here’s a great video on this subject–i.e., money created from “thin air”, i.e., from our promissory notes that has great sourcing:
Thanks for the comment Eggsistence. And thanks for the links. I will check them out. Hope to hear from you again. Glad you enjoyed. We few have to stick together. — L
Your articles are great!
I have tried to post comments many times to no avail. The comment does not go thru and upon second attempt there is a message that says, “Duplicate comment detected; it looks as though you’ve already said that!”
Did you know that folks can’t post?
It sure is frustrating! Many people will just go somewhere else.
I’m sorry to hear about that H2O. That is the first I have heard about such an issue. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. If it happens again please let me know. I have done an investigation and can’t find anything to account for it. At least it worked now. lol. Glad you enjoy the site DESPITE that problem.
<<< Thank you for your visit >>>
Websites to related : thecattylife
thecattylife for all things cattylicious i mumi eatcontactarchives
Native Braids - Stories From theABOUT NATIVE BRAIDS LISTEN SHARE YOUR STORY ABOUT LISTEN CONTACT Navigation Sh
Dd Waiver | United States | Dire:root{--color_0:255,255,255;--color_27:144,159,167;--color_1:255,255,255;--color_2:0,0,0;--color_3:237,28,36;--color_4:0,136,203;--col
The Global Muslim Brotherhood DaThe Global Muslim Brotherhood Daily Watch An Intelligence Digest Covering Developments In T
Welcome to the EstoriEstorick Collection of modern italian art
SyntheticTelepathy.comThe term 'Synthetic Telepathy' most often describes direct mind to mind communication obtained by technological me
Global Prayer Resource Network &Skip to contentGlobal Prayer Resource NetworkA Hub for Prayer ResourcesHomeAboutContact UsDonationsEvents & InitiativesNationsUnreached & Lo
Brenne Whisky | The Singular MalBrenne Whiskey | French Single MaltOur StoryBuy Now Decadently Delicious, Approachably Luxurious, Gracefully Audacious French Whisky..Buy NowThe Si
WeHealth | Ending the threat andSOLUTI
The Global EliteAboutContactSubmit News
adsHot Websites
I have only today came across your site and I gleefully add you to my list of admired legal beagles with the likes of Lysander Spooner and Riccardo Johanson (Emergence from Illusion.) I have been into the investigation of the legal system (and the word games it plays) for a long time and I thank you for your site for the continuance of this quest and the information it contains. We are all responsible to spread the information we glean from the background noise and share it with others, and you my brother, seem to do it in spades.
My adventures into the legal system began in 1971 in 9th grade civics class (dating myself here) when I argued with my teacher that the 9 black robed, appointed for life, “authorities” were in fact our collective dictators, and that in fact we were a country “by the corporation, of the corporation, and for the corporation.” In 1972 I was involved in a lawsuit against the local school board for our “right to freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, and freedom to petition.” We spent 3 days in Federal District Court in New Orleans and Judge Christianberry’s (sp?) final decree was that we “had no Constitutional rights till we were legal voting age, which at this time is 21.” We appealed and the Appellate Court upheld that decree. The Supreme Court refused to hear our case because we “had no standing.” This only served to confirm my previous arguments with my Civics teacher. This was at a time when friends only a year or two older were getting drafted and sent to Viet Nam and the legal drinking age (in Louisiana) was 18.
Now think of this. In 1971 it was decided in “Federal Court” that you had no rights till a appointed time in your life, and that it was upheld in the “Appellate Court”, and finally in the “Supreme Court” that you had “no standing” … how could you possibly rely on that “government” to “protect you rights?” Or that these “Courts” had the ultimate say in your ultimate destiny? Or even the fact that this is all INSANE on any human level.
It is my opinion that critical and analytical thinking skills have been eliminated from our tool kit by the “education system.” When I read or hear the term “system” I imagine a sewer system that is designed for moving crap along. The Trivium is the tool that is sorely lacking in our times today and I invite all to explore this at http://www.theillusionsapocalypse.com/chapter-1.html This is my site and just like yours it is provided at cost to myself to awaken the masses and bring discussion to the topic, so that we may free ourselves from this “legal illusion.”
The Trivium teaches us to pay attention to the meaning of words (the Grammar) and also to the logical fallacies and lies incorporated into the “legal system” and “education system” (there are those crap moving systems again) to move the masses into a direction desired by the insane ones in power through the lack of Logic, and then to finally not arrive at a conclusion by not analyzing both sides by way of the lack of Rhetoric. That is our collective relief, the Trivium … Grammar, Logic, and Rhetoric. Lawyers do not use “words” … they use “terms” that sound like our words but have different meanings. They are of the “Legal Society” and by law a society has the legal right to create its own language to hide its goals, and the language they chose is an abomination of the English language that we use everyday.
I will cut this post short by saying thank you for your work and I only hope that others are paying attention, for that is our only hope. Keep up the great work and “love ya’ bro!”